Essentiality, Efficiency, and the Efficient Component-Pricing Rule

Journal of Regulatory Economics

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 71-80

  Larson, Alexander C ^a   Lehman, Dale E ^a  

^a Southwestern Bell Telephone Company   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031491443     PISSN: 0922680X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1007909920018     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Albon, Robert. 1994. "Interconnection Pricing: An Analysis of the Efficient Component Pricing Rule." Telecommunications Policy 18: 414-420.
2. Armstrong, Mark, Chris Doyle, and John Vickers. 1996. "The Access Pricing Problem: A Synthesis." Journal of Industrial Economics 44: 131-150.
3. Baumol, William J. 1983. "Some Subtle Pricing Issues in Railroad Regulation." International Journal of Transportation Economics 10: 341-355.
4. Baumol, William J., and J. Gregory Sidak, 1994a. "The Pricing of Inputs Sold to Competitors." Yale Journal on Regulation 11: 171-202.
5. Baumol, William J., and J. Gregory Sidak. 1994b. Toward Competition in Local Telephony. Cambridge.: MIT Press and Washington: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research: 93-116.
6. Baumol, William J., and J. Gregory Sidak. 1995. "The Pricing of Inputs Sold to Competitors: Rejoinder and Epilogue." Yale Journal on Regulation 12: 177-186.
7. Blair, Roger D., and Amanda K. Esquibel. 1996. "The Roles of Areeda, Turner and Economic Theory in Measuring Monopoly Power." Antitrust Bulletin 41: 781-813.
8. Crew, Michael A., and Paul R. Kleindorfer. 1996. "Access Pricing, Stranded Assets and Peak Loads." Unpublished manuscript.
9. Crew, Michael A., and Paul R. Kleindorfer. 1995. "Pricing in Postal Service Under Competitive Entry." In Commercialization of Postal and Delivery Services, edited by Michael A. Crew and Paul R. Kleindorfer. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers: 117-136.
10. Diewert, W. E. 1971. "A Note on the Elasticity of Derived Demand in the N-Factor Case." Economica 38: 192-198.
11. Economides, Nicholas, and Lawrence J. White. 1995. "Interconnection and Access Pricing: How Efficient Is the 'Efficient Component-Pricing Rule?'" Antitrust Bulletin 40: 557-579.
12. Economides, Nicholas, and Lawrence J. White. Forthcoming. "The Inefficiency of the ECPR Yet Again: A Reply to Larson" Antitrust Bulletin.
13. Kahn, Alfred E., and William E. Taylor, 1994. "The Pricing of Inputs Sold to Competitors: A Comment." Yale Journal on Regulation 11: 225-240.
14. Laffont, Jean-Jacques, and Jean Tirole. 1994. "Access Pricing and Competition." European Economic Review 38: 1673-1710.
15. Laffont, Jean-Jacques, and Jean Tirole. 1996. "Creating Competition Through Interconnection: Theory and Practice." Journal of Regulatory Economics 10: 227-256.
16. Laffont, Jean-Jacques, and Jean Tirole. 1993. A Theory of Incentives in Procurement and Regulation. Cambridge: MIT Press: 255-267.
17. Larson, Alexander C. Forthcoming. "The Efficiency of the Efficient Component-Pricing Rule: A Comment." Antitrust Bulletin.
18. Maurice, S. C. 1975. "On the Importance of Being Unimportant: An Analysis of the Paradox in Marshall's Third Rule of Derived Demand." Economica 42: 385-393.
19. Mitchell, Bridger, Werner Neu, Karl-Heinz Meumann, and Ingo Vogelsang. 1995. "The Regulation of Pricing of Interconnection Services." In Toward a Competitive Telecommunication Industry, edited by Gerald W. Brock. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: 95-118.
20. Tye, William B. 1993. "Pricing Market Access for Regulated Firms." Logistics and Transportation Review 29: 39-67.
21. Tye, William B. 1994. "The Pricing of Inputs Sold to Competitors: A Response." Yale Journal on Regulation 11: 203-240.
22. Varian, Hal R. 1978. Microeconomic Analysis. New York: W. W. Norton and Company: 58-63.
23. Willig, Robert D. 1979. "The Theory of Network Access Pricing." In Issues in Public Utility Regulation, edited by Harry M. Trebing. Michigan State University Public Utilities Papers: 109-152.
24. Wisecarver, Daniel. 1974. "The Social Costs of Input-Market Distortions." American Economic Review 64:359-372.