The varying effect of individualism-collectivism on preference for methods of conflict resolution

Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 38-43

  Gire, James T ^a  

^a VIRGINIA MILITARY INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031490753     PISSN: 0008400X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0008-400X.29.1.38     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Chinese Culture Connection (1987). Chinese values and the search for culture-free dimensions of culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 18, 143-164.
2. Gire, J.T., & Garment, D.W. (1993). Dealing with disputes: The influence of individualism-collectivism. The Journal of Social Psychology, 133(1), 81-95.
3. Hayden, R.M., & Anderson, J.K. (1979). On the evaluation of procedural systems in laboratory experiments: A critique of Thibaut and Walker. Law and Human Behaviour, 3, 21-38.
4. Heuer, L.B., & Penrod, S. (1986). Procedural preference as a function of conflict intensity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 700-710.
5. Hiltrop, J.M., & Rubin, J.Z. (1982). Effects of intervention mode and conflict of interest on dispute resolution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 665-672.
6. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
7. Hofstede, G. (1983). Dimensions of national cultures in fifty countries and three regions. In B. Deregowski, S. Dziurawiec, & R.C. Annis (Eds.), Expiscations in cross-cultural psychology (pp. 335-355). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets and Zeitlinger.
8. Hui, C.H. (1988). Measurement of individualism-collectivism. Journal of Research in Personality, 22, 17-36.
9. Kurtz, S.T., & Houlden, P. (1981). Determinants of procedural preferences of post court-martial military personnel. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 2, 27-43.
10. Leung, K. (1985). Cross-cultural study of procedural fairness and disputing behaviour. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
11. Leung, K. (1987). Some determinants of reactions to procedural models of conflict resolution: A cross-national study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 898-908.
12. Leung, K., Au, Y., Fernandez-Dols, J.M., & Iwawaki, S. (1992). Preference for modes of conflict processing in two collectivist cultures. International Journal of Psychology, 27, 195-209.
13. Leung, K. Bond, M.H., Carment, D.W. Krishan, L., & Liebrand, W.B. (1990). Effects of cultural femininity on preference for methodes of conflict resolution. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 373-388.
14. Leung, K., & Lind, E.A. (1986). Procedure and culture: Effects of culture, gender and investigator status on procedural preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 1134-1140.
15. Lind. E.A., Erickson, B.E., Friedland, N., & Dickenberger, M. (1978). Reactions to procedural models for adjudicative conflict resolution. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 22, 318-341.
16. Schopler, J., Insko, C.A., Graetz, K.A., Drigotas, S., Smith, V.A., & Dahl, K. (1993). Individual-group discontinuity: Further evidence for mediation by fear and greed. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 419-431.
17. Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1978). A theory of procedure. California Law Review, 66, 541-566.
19. Triandis, H.C. (1994). Culture and social behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.