The accuracy of different methods for estimating the standard error of correlations corrected for range restriction

Educational and Psychological Measurement

Volumn 57, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 254-265

  Duan, Bin ^b   Dunlap, William P ^a  

^a Tulane University   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031490687     PISSN: 00131644     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0013164497057002005     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Alexander, R. A., Hanges, P. J., & Alliger, G. M. (1985). Correcting for restriction of range in both X and Y when the unrestricted variances are unknown. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9, 317-323.
2. Allen, N., & Dunbar, S. B. (1990). Standard error of correlations adjusted for incidental selection. Applied Psychological Measurement, 14, 83-94.
3. American Psychological Association. (1974). Standards for educational and psychological tests. Washington, DC: Author.
4. Bobko, P. (1983). An analysis of correlations corrected for attenuation and range restriction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 584-589.
5. Bobko, P., & Rieck, A. (1980). Large sample estimators for standard errors of functions of correlation coefficients. Applied Psychological Measurement, 4, 385-398.
6. Fisher, R. A. (1915). Frequency-distribution of the values of the correlation coefficient in samples from an indefinitely large population. Biometrika, 10, 507.
7. Fisher, R. A. (1954). Statistical methods for research workers. Edinburgh, Scotland: Oliver & Boyd.
8. Forsyth, R. A. (1971). An empirical note on correlation coefficients corrected for restriction in range. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 31, 115-123.
9. Greener, J. M., & Osburn, H. G. (1979). An empirical study of the accuracy of corrections for restriction in range due to explicit selection. Applied Psychological Measurement, 3, 31-41.
10. Gross, A. L. (1982). Relaxing the assumptions underlying corrections for restriction of range. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 42, 795-801.
11. Gross, A. L., & Fleischman, L. (1983). Restriction of range correction when both distribution and selection assumptions are violated. Applied Psychological Measurement, 7, 227-237.
12. Gullickson, A., & Hopkins, K. (1976). Interval estimation of correlation coefficients corrected for restriction of range. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 36, 9-25.
13. Holmes, D. J. (1990). The robustness of the usual correction for restriction in range due to explicit selection. Psychometrika, 55, 19-32.
14. Huitema, B. E., & Stein, C. R. (1993). Validity of the GRE without restriction of range. Psychological Reports, 72, 123-127.
15. Kelley, T. L. (1923). Statistical methods. New York: Macmillan.
16. Knapp, T. R., & Swoyer, V. H. (1967). Some empirical results concerning the power of Bartlett's test of the significance of a correlation matrix. American Educational Research Journal, 4, 13-17.
17. Lawley, D. A. (1943). A note on Karl Pearson's selection formulae. Royal Society of Edinburgh Proceedings A, 62, 28-30.
18. Linn, R. L., Harnisch, D. L., & Dunbar, S. B. (1981). Corrections for range restrictions: An empirical investigation of conditions resulting in conservative corrections. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 655-663.
19. Mendoza, J. L., Hart, D. E., & Powell, A. (1991). A bootstrap confidence interval based on a correlation corrected for range restriction. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 26, 255-269.
20. Millsap, R. (1989). Sampling variance in the correlation coefficient under range restriction: A Monte Carlo study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 456-461.
21. Pearson, K. (1903). Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution: XI. On the influence of natural selection on the variability and correlation of organs. Transactions of the Royal Society, London, Series A, 200, 1-66.
22. Raju, N. S., Burke, M. J., Normand, J., & Langlois, G. M. (1991). Anew meta-analytic approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 432-446.
23. Ree, M. J., Carretta, T. R., Earles, J. A., & Albert, W. (1994). Sign changes when correlating for range restriction: A note on Pearson's and Lawley's selection formulas. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 298-301.
24. Schmidt, F. L., Hunter, J. E., & Urry, V. W. (1976). Statistical power in criterion-related validity studies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 473-485.
25. Thorndike, R. L. (1949). Personnel selection. New York: John Wiley.