Toward a gramscian critical rhetoric

Western Journal of Communication

Volumn 61, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 66-86

  Zompetti, Joseph P ^a  

^a WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031490685     PISSN: 10570314     EISSN: 17451027     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10570319709374562     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Althusser, L. (1971). Lenin and philosophy and other essays. New York: Monthly Review Press.
2. Amariglio, J. L., Resnick, S. A., & Wolff, R. D. (1988). Class, power, and culture. In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 487-501). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
3. Aune, J. (1994). Rhetoric and Marxism. Boulder, CO: Westview.
4. Balthrop, V. W. (1984). Culture, myth, and ideology as public argument: An interpretation of the ascent and demise of "Southern Culture." Communication Monographs, 51, 339-352.
5. Baudrillard, J. (1983). Simulations. New York: Semiotext(e).
6. Biesecker, B. (1992). Michel Foucault and the question of rhetoric. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 25, 351-364.
7. Bodroghkozy, A. (1991). A Gramscian analysis of entertainment television and the youth rebellion of the 1960s. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 8, 217-230.
8. Braden, W. W. (1975). Myths in a rhetorical context. Southern Speech Communication Journal, 40, 113-126.
9. Campbell, J. (1968). The hero with a thousand faces (2nd ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10. Carragee, K. M. (1993). A critical evaluation of debates examining the media hegemony thesis. Western Journal of Communication, 57, 330-348.
11. Cassirer, E. (1946). Language and myth. New York: Dover Publications.
12. Charland, M. (1991). Finding a horizon and telos: The challenge to critical rhetoric. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 77, 71-74.
13. Clair, R. P. (1993). The use of framing devices to sequester organizational narratives: Hegemony and harassment. Communication Monographs, 60, 113-136.
14. Cocks, J. (1989). The oppositional imagination: Feminism, critique and political theory. London: Routledge.
15. Condit, C. M. (1994). Hegemony in a mass-mediated society: Concordance about reproductive technologies. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 11, 205-230.
16. Conrad, C. (1988). Work songs, hegemony, and illusions of self. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 5, 179-201.
17. Cooper, M. (1988). Rhetorical criticism and Foucault's use of discursive events. Communication Studies, 39, 1-17.
18. Derrida, J. (1984). No apocalypse, not now (full speed ahead, seven missiles, seven missives). Diacritics, 14, 20-31.
19. Dow, B. J. (1990). Hegemony, feminist criticism and The Mary Tyler Moore Show. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 7, 261-274.
20. Eastland, L. S. (1994). Habermas, emancipation, and relationship change: An exploration of recovery processes as a model for social transformation. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 22, 162-176.
21. Farrell, T. (1993). Norms of rhetorical culture. New York: Yale University Press.
22. Fontana, B. (1993). Hegemony and power: On the relation between Gramsci and Machiavelli. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
23. Foucault, M. (1980a). The history of sexuality, Vol. 1. New York: Vintage.
24. Foucault, M. (1980b). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977. New York: Pantheon Books.
25. Foss, S. K. (1987). Michel Foucault's theory of rhetoric as epistemic. Western Journal of Communication, 51, 384-401.
26. Francesconi, R. (1986). The implications of Habermas' theory of legitimation for rhetorical criticism. Communication Monographs, 53, 16-35.
27. Germino, D. (1990). Antonio Gramsci: Architect of a new politics. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.
28. Gramsci, A. (1947). To Tatiana. Lettere dal carcere. E. Fubini & S. Caprioglio (Eds.). Turin: Einaudi.
29. Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks. (Q. Hoare & G. N. Smith, Eds. & Trans.). New York: International Publishers.
30. Gramsci, A. (1975). Qauderni del careere, voIs. 1-4. V. Gerratana (Ed.). Turin: Einaudi.
31. Gramsci, A. (1977). II Grido del popolo (1916, January 29). In Q. Hoare (Ed.), and J. Mathews (Trans.), Selections from political writings, 1910-1920. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
32. Gramsci, A. (1995). Further selections from the prison notebooks (D. Boothman, Ed. and Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
33. Griffin, C. L. (1994). Rhetoricizing alienation: Mary Wollstonecraft and the rhetorical construction of women's oppression. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 80, 293-312.
34. Grossberg, L. (1979). Marxist dialectics and rhetorical criticism. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 65, 235-249.
35. Grossberg, L. (1984). Strategies of Marxist cultural interpretation. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 1, 392-421.
36. Grossberg, L. (1988). Postmodemity and affect: All dressed up with no place to go. Communication, 10, 271-293.
37. Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action: Reason and rationalization of society (Vol. 1, T. McCarthy, Trans.). Boston: Beacon Press.
38. Habermas, J. (1987). The philosophical discourses of modernity. (F. Lawrence, Trans.). Cambridge: MIT Press.
39. Hall, S. (1980). Encoding/decoding. In S. Hall, D. Hobson, A. Lowe and P. Willis (Eds.), Culture, media, language (pp. 128-140). London: Hutchinson.
40. Hall, S. (1986a). Gramsci's relevance for the study of race and ethnicity. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 10, 5-27.
41. Hall, S. (1986b). On postmodernism and articulation: An interview with Stuart Hall. Lawrence Grossberg (Ed.), Journal of Communication Inquiry, 10, 45-60.
42. Hall, S. (1986c). The problem of ideology-Marxism without guarantees. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 10, 28-43.
43. Hall, S. (1989). Ideology and communication theory. In B. Dervin, L. Grossberg, B. J. O'Keefe, & E. Wartella (Eds.), Rethinking communication: Volume 1: Paradigm issues (pp. 40-52). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
44. Hanke, R. (1990). Hegemonic masculinity in thirtysomething. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 7, 231-248.
45. Hariman, R. (1991). Critical rhetoric and postmodern theory. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 77, 67-70.
46. Harris, D. (1992). From class struggle to the politics of pleasure: The effects ofGramscian-ism on cultural studies. London: Routledge.
47. Holub, R. (1992). Antonio Gramsci: Beyond marxism and postmodernism. London: Routledge.
48. Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T. (1972). The dialectic of enlightenment (J. Cumming, Trans.). New York: Continuum.
49. Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (1993). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. London: Verso.
50. Lentricchia, F. (1985). Criticism and social change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
51. Lewis, C. (1992). Making sense of common sense: A framework for tracking hegemony. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 9, 277-292.
52. Lincoln, B. (1989). Discourse and the construction of society: Comparative studies of myth, ritual, and classification. New York: Oxford University Press.
53. Marx, K. (1967). Capital, Vol. 3. New York: International.
54. McKerrow, R. E. (1989). Critical rhetoric: Theory and praxis. Communication Monographs, 56, 91-111.
55. McKerrow, R. E. (1991). Critical rhetoric in a postmodern world. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 77, 75-78.
56. Moore, M. P. (1991). A rhetorical criticism of political myth: From Goldwater legend to Reagan mystique. Communication Studies, 42, 295-308.
57. Ono, K. A., & Sloop, J. M. (1992). Commitment to telos-a sustained critical rhetoric. Communication Monographs, 59, 48-60.
58. Ono, K. A., & Sloop, J. M. (1995). The critique of vernacular discourse. Communication Monographs, 62, 19-45.
59. Perelman, C., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969). The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation. (J. Wilkinson & P. Weaver, Trans.). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
60. Rowland, R. C. (1990). On a limited approach to mythic criticism: Rowland's rejoinder. Communication Studies, 41, 150-160.
61. Rowland, R. C., Rushing, J., Solomon, M., & Brummett, B. (1990). On mythic criticism. Communication Studies, 41, 278-298.
62. Salamini, L. (1981). The sociology of political praxis: An introduction to Gramsci's theory. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
63. Sassoon, A. S. (1987). Gramsci's politics (2nd ed.). London: Hutchinson.
64. Sawicki, J. (1991). Disciplining Foucault: Feminism, power, and the body. New York: Routledge.
65. Slack, J. D. (1996). The theory and method of articulation in cultural studies. In D. Morley & K. H. Chen (Eds.), Stuart Hall: Critical dialogues in cultural studies (pp. 112-127). London: Routledge.
66. Solomon, M. (1990). Responding to Rowland's myth or in defense of pluralism: A reply to Rowland. Communication Studies, 41, 117-120.
67. Sorel, G. (1961).Reflections on violence. (T. E. Hume, Trans.). New York: Edward A. Shils.
68. Stabile, C. A. (1995). Resistance, recuperation, and reflexivity: The limits of a paradigm. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 12, 403-422.
69. Stone, J. L. (1991). Contextualizing biogenetic and reproductive technologies. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 8, 309-322.
70. Taylor, B. C. (1992). The politics of the nuclear text: Reading Robert Oppenheimer's Letters and Recollections. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 78, 429-449.
71. Trujillo, N. (1993). Interpreting November 22: A critical ethnography of an assassination site. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 79, 447-466.
72. Tbulmin, S. (1972). Human understanding. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
73. Vernon, R. (Ed.) (1978). Commitment and change: Georges Sorel and the idea of revolution. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
74. Wilkie, R. W. (1976). Karl Marx on rhetoric. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 9, 232-246.