Capacity, inclination, and sensitivity for mathematics

Anxiety, Stress and Coping

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 5-33

  Boekaerts, Monique ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Cognitive capacity and motivation; Mathematics achievement

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031489299     PISSN: 10615806     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10615809708249293     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Boekaerts, M. (1985). Some new developments in the study of motivational processes in a class context. In G. D'Ydewalle (Ed.), Cognition, information processing, and motivation (Vol. 3, pp. 569-586). Amsterdam: North Holland.
2. Boekaerts, M. (1987). Die Effekte von state- und trait-motivationaler Orientierung auf das Lernergebnis. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 1(1), 29-43.
3. Boekaerts, M. (1988). Motivated learning: Bias in appraisals. International Journal of Educational Research, 12, 267-280.
4. Boekaerts, M. (1992). The adaptable learning process: Initiating and maintaining behavioural change. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 41(4), 377-397.
5. Boekaerts, M. (1993). Being concerned with well-being and with learning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 149-167.
6. Boekaerts, M. (1994a, April). How can students be motivated for active learning? Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association annual confiderence, New Orleans.
7. Boekaerts, M. (1994b). Confidence and doubt in relation to mathematics. Scientia Paedagogica Experimentalis, 2, 287-304.
8. Boekaerts, M. (1996). Coping with stress in childhood and adolescence. In M. Zeidner & N. S. Endler (Eds.), Handbook of coping pp. 452-484. New York: Wiley.
9. Boekaerts, M. (1995). The interface between intelligence and personality as determinants of classroom learning. In D.H. Saklofske & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of personality and intelligence pp. 161-183. New York: Plenum Press.
10. Boekaerts, M., Crombach, M.J., & Voeten, M.J.M. (in press). Task attraction as a determinant of intended effort on curricular tasks.
11. Boekaerts, M., Seegers, G., & Vermeer, H. (1995). Solving math problems: Where and why does the solution process go astray? Educational Studies Mathematics, 28, 241-262.
12. Cantor, N. (1981). Perceptions of situations. In D. Magnusson (Ed.), Toward a psychology of situation. An interactional perspective (pp. 229-244). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Cobb, P., Wood, T., Yackel, E., Nicholls, J., Wheatley, G., Trigatti, B., & Perlwitz, M. (1991). Assessment of a problem-centered second grade mathematics project. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22, 3-29.
14. Crombach, M.J., Voeten, M.J.M., & Boekaerts, M. (1994). A model for explaining individual differences between students in intended effort on curricular tasks. Tijdschrift voor Onderwijsresearch, 19(4), 301-317.
15. Cudeck, R., & Browne, M.W. (1983). Cross-validation of covariance structures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 18, 147-167.
16. Deffenbacher, J.L., & Hazaleus, S.L. (1985). Cognitive, emotional and physiological components of test anxiety. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 9(2), 169-180.
17. Eccles (Parsons), J., Adler, T.F., Futterman, R., Goff, S.B., Kaczala, C.M., Meece, J.L., & Midgley, C. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In J.T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives: Psychological and sociological approaches (pp. 75-146). San Francisco: W.H. Freeman & Co.
18. Eccles (Parsons), J., Adler, T.F., Futterman, R., Goff, S.B., Kaczala, C.M., Meece, J.L., & Midgley, C. (1985) Self-perceptions, task perceptions, socializing influences, and the decision to enroll in mathematics. In S. F. Chipman, L. R. Brush, D. M. Wilson (Eds.), Woman and mathematics: Balancing the equation (pp. 95-121). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. Eysenck, M. (1987). Anxiety and attention. Anxiety Research, 1, 9-15.
20. Gjesme, T. (1982). Motivation to approach success (Ts) and Motivation to avoid failure (Tf) at school. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 12, 145-164.
21. Gravemeyer, K.P.E. (1994). Developing realistic mathematics education. Utrecht, The Netherlands: DcB-Press.
22. Helmke, A. (1988). The role of classroom context factors for the achievement-impairing effect of test anxiety. Anxiety Research, 1, 37-52.
23. Helmke, A. (1989). The impact of student self-concept of ability and task motivation on different indicators of effort at school. International Journal of Educational Research, 13(8), 281-295.
24. Hembree, R. (1988). Correlates, causes, effects and treatment of test anxiety. Review of Educational Research, 58, 47-77.
25. Jöreskog, K.G., & Sörbom, D. (1988). LISREL 7. A guide to the program and applications. Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc.
26. Kuhl, J. (1985). Volitional mediators of cognition-behavior consistency: Self-regulatory processes and action versus state orientation. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.). Action control: From cognition to behaviour. Berlin: Springer.
27. Lazarus, R.S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal and coping. New York: Springer.
28. Leventhal, H. (1980). Toward a comprehensive theory of emotion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 13, pp. 140-208). New York: Academic Press.
29. Leventhal, H., Diefenbach, M., & Leventhal, E.A. (1992). Illness cognition: Using common sense to understand treatment adherence and affect cognition interactions. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 16, 143-163.
30. Meece, J.L., Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J.S. (1990). Predictors of math anxiety and its influence on young adolescents' course enrollment intentions and performance in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 60-70.
31. Oka, E.R., & Paris, S.G. (1987). Pattern of learning and motivation among under-achieving children. In S. Ceci (Ed.). Handbook of cognitive, social, and neuropsychological aspects of learning disabilities. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
32. Peterson, P.L. Carpenter, T.C., & Fennema, E. (1989). Teachers' knowledge of students' knowledge in mathematics problem solving: Correlational and case analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 558-569.
33. Pintrich, P.R., & De Groot, E.V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33-40.
34. Rost, D.H., & Schermer, F.J. (1987). The assessment of coping with test anxiety. In R. Schwarzer, H.M. van der Ploeg & C. B. Spielberger (Eds.), Advances in test anxiety research (Vol. 6, pp. 179-191). Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.
35. Schönpflug, W. (1989). Anxiety and effort. In D. Forgays, T. Sosvowski & K. Wriesnewski (Eds.), Advances in anxiety research. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
36. Seegers, G., & Boekaerts, M. (1993). Task motivation and mathematics achievement in actual task situations. Learning and Instruction, 3, 133-150.
37. Seegers, G., & Boekaerts, M. (1966). Gender-related differences in self-referenced cognitions in relation to mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(2), 215-240.
38. Skinner, E.A., Wellborn, J.G., & Connell, J.P. (1990). What it takes to do well in school and whether I've got it: A process model of perceived control and children's engagement and achievement in school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 22-23.
39. Tobias, S. (1985). Test anxiety: Interference, defective skills, and cognitive capacity. Educational Psychologist, 28, 135-142.
40. Tobias, S. (1992). The impact of test anxiety on cognition in school learning. In K. A. Hagtvet & T. Backer Johnson (Eds.), Advances in test research (pp. 18-31). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
41. Weinert, F.E., & Helmke, A. (1987). Compensatory effects of student self-concept and instructional quality on academic achievement. In F. Hallisch & J. Kuhl (Eds.), Motivation, intention and volition (pp. 233-247). Berlin: Springer.
42. Weinstein, C.E., Goetz, E.T., & Alexander, P.A. (1988). Learning and study strategies. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
43. Zimmerman, B.J. & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 51-59.