Mobility regimes and generative mechanisms: A comparative analysis of Italy and the United States

European Sociological Review

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 179-198

  Pisati, Maurizio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TRENTO   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031488545     PISSN: 02667215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.esr.a018211     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Allmendinger, J. (1989) Educational systems and labor market outcomes. European Sociological Review, 5, 231-250.
2. Barbagli, M., Capecchi, V., Cobalti, A., De Lillo, A., and Schizzerotto, A. (1986) Indagine nationale sulla mobilità sociale (machine-readable data file and documentation). Università degli Studi di Trento, Trento.
3. Blau, P. and Duncan, O. D. (1967) The American Occupational Structure. Wiley, New York.
4. Boudon, R. (1973) L'inégalité des chances. La mobilité sociale dans les sociétés industrielles. Librairie Armand Colin, Paris.
5. Boudon, R. (1977) Effets pervers et ordre social. PUF, Paris.
6. Boudon, R. (1979) La logique du social. Librairie Hachette, Paris.
7. Boudon, R. (1984) La place du désordre. Critique des théories du changement social. PUF, Paris.
8. Boudon, R. (1986) L'ideologie. L'origine des idées reçues. Fayard, Paris.
9. Boudon, R. (1987) The individualistic tradition in sociology. In Alexander, J. et al. (eds) The Micro-Macro Link. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp. 45-70.
10. Breen, R. (1987) Sources of cross-national variations in mobility regimes: English, French and Swedish data reanalysed. Sociology, 21, 75-90.
11. Breen, R. and Whelan, C. T. (1993) From ascription to achievement? Origins, education and entry to the labour force in the Republic of Ireland during the twentieth century. Acta Sociologica, 36, 3-17.
12. Breen, R. and Whelan, C. T. (1994) Modelling trends in social fluidity: the core model and a measured-variable approach compared. European Sociological Review, 10, 259-272.
13. Cavalli, A. and De Lillo, A. (eds) (1993) Giovani anni'90. Il Mulino, Bologna.
14. Cobalti, A. and Schizzerotto, A. (1994) La mobilità sociale in Italia. Il Mulino, Bologna.
15. Davis, J. A. and Smith, T. W. (1989a) General Social Surveys, 1972-1989: Cumulative Codebook. National Opinion Research Center, Chicago.
16. Davis, J. A. and Smith, T. W. (1989b) General Social Surveys, 1972-1989 (machine-readable data file). National Opinion Research Center, Chicago (producer); Storrs: The Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, Chicago (distributor).
17. Duncan, O. D. (1961a) A socioeconomic index for all occupations. In Reiss, A. J. Jr. (ed.) Occupations and Social Status. Free Press of Glencoe, New York, pp. 109-138.
18. Duncan, O. D. (1961b) Properties and characteristics of the socioeconomic index. In Reiss, A. J., Jr. (ed.) Occupations and Social Status, New York: Free Press of Glencoe, New York, pp. 139-161.
19. Elster, J. (1983a) Explaining Technical Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
20. Elster, J. (1983b) Sour Grapes: Studies in the Subversion of Nationality. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
21. Elster, J. (1989) Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
22. Elster, J. (1993) Political Psychology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
23. Erikson, R., and Goldthorpe, J. H. (1985) Are American rates of social mobility exceptionally high? New evidence on an old issue. European Sociological Review, 1, 1-22.
24. Erikson, R. and Goldthorpe, J. H. (1992) The Constant Flux. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
25. Erikson, R., Goldthorpe, J. H., and Portocarero, L. (1982) Social fluidity in industrial nations: England, France and Sweden. British Journal of Sociology, 33, 1-34.
26. Featherman, D. L., Jones, L. F., and Hauser, R. M. (1975) Assumptions of social mobility research in the U.S.: the case of occupational status. Social Science Research, 4, 329-360.
27. Ganzeboom, H. B. G., Luijkx, R., Treiman, D. J. (1989) Intergenerational class mobility in comparative perspective. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 8, 3-84.
28. Ganzeboom, H. B. G., Treiman, D. J., and Ultee, W. C. (1991) Comparative intergenerational stratification research: three generations and beyond. Annual Review of Sociology, 17, 277-302.
29. Goldthorpe, J. H., Llewellyn, C., and Payne, C. (1987) Social Mobility and Class Structure in Modern Britain, 2nd edn. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
30. Goodman, L A. (1979) Simple models for the analysis of association in cross-classifications having ordered categories. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 537-552.
31. Goodman, L. A. (1991) Measures, models, and graphical displays in the analysis of cross-classified data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 86, 1085-1111.
32. Haller, M., König, W., Krause, P., Kurz, K. (1985) Patterns of career mobility and structural positions in advanced capitalist societies: a comparison of men in Austria, France, and the United States. American Sociological Review, 50, 579-603.
33. Hazelrigg, L. K. and Garnier, M. A. (1976) Occupational mobility and industrial society: a comparative analysis of differential access to occupational ranks in 17 countries. American Sociological Review, 41, 498-511.
34. Heath, A. (1981) Social Mobility. Fontana-Collins, London.
35. Hopper, E. I. (1968) A typology for the classification of educational systems. Sociology, 1, 29-45.
36. Hout, M. (1983) Mobility Tables. Sage, Beverly Hills, Calif.
37. Hout, M. (1984) Status, autonomy, and training in occupational mobility. American Journal of Sociology, 89, 1379-1409.
38. Hout, M. (1988) More universalism, less structural mobility: the American occupational structure in the 1980s. American Journal of Sociology, 93, 1358-1400.
39. Kappelhoff, P. and Teckenberg, W. (1987) Intergenerational and career mobility in the Federal Republic and the United States. In Teckenberg, W. (ed.) Comparative Studies of Social Structure. Recent Research on Prance, the United States, and the Federal Republic of Germany. M. E. Sharpe, Armonk, pp. 3-49.
40. Kerckhoff, A. C., Campbell, R. T., Winfield-Lair, I. (1985) Social mobility in Great Britain and the United States. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 281-308.
41. Lipset, S. M. and Bendix, R. (1959) Social Mobility in Industrial Society. University of California Press, Berkeley.
42. Little, D. (1991) Varieties of Social Explanation. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Social Sciences. Westview Press, Boulder, Colo.
43. Manski, C. F. (1981) Structural models for discrete data: the analysis of discrete choice. In Leinhardt, S. (ed.) Sociological Methodology 1981. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 58-109.
44. Miller, S. M. (1960) Comparative social mobility: a trend report and bibliography. Current Sociology, 9, 1-89.
45. Pawson, R. (1989) A Measure for Measures. A Manifesto for Empirical Sociology. Routledge, London.
46. Pawson, R. (1993) Social mobility. In Morgan, D. and Stanley, L. (eds) Debates in Sociology. Manchester University Press, Manchester, pp. 26-51.
47. Pisati, M, (1994) Strutture di classe e processi di mobilità sociale. Un'analisi comparata di Italia e Stati Uniti. PhD dissertation, Università degli Studi di Trento.
48. Pöntinen, S. (1983) Social Mobility and Social Structure. A Comparison of Scandinavian Countries. Societas Scientiarum Fennica, Helsinki.
49. Portocarero, L. (1987) Social Mobility in Industrial Societies: Women in France and Sweden. Almqvist & Wiksell, Stockholm.
50. Raftery, A. E. (1985) Social mobility measures for cross-national comparisons. Quality and Quantity, 19, 167-182.
51. Raftery, A. E. (1994) Approximate Bayes Factors and Accounting for Model Uncertainty in Generalized Linear Models. Technical Report no. 255, Department of Statistics, University of Washington.
52. Raftery, A. E. (1995) Bayesian model selection in social research (with discussion by Andrew Gelman & Donald B. Rubin, and Rober M. Hauser, and a rejoinder). In Marsden, P. V. (ed.) Sociological Methodology 1995. Blackwells, Cambridge.
53. Raftery, A. E. and Richardson, S. (1995) Model selection for generalized linear models via GLIB, with application to epidemiology. In Berry, D. A. and Strangl, D. K. (eds) Bayesian Biostatistics. Dekker, New York.
54. Roos, P. A. (1985) Gender and Work: A Comparative Analysis of Industrial Societies. State University of New York Press, Albany.
55. Schadee, H. M. A. and Schizzerotto, A. (1990) Processi di mobilità maschili e femminili nell'Italia contemporanea. Polis, 4, 97-139.
56. Shavit, Y. and Blossfeld, H.-P. (eds) (1993) Persisting Inequality: Changing Educational Stratification in Thirteen Countries. Westview Press, Boulder, Colo.
57. Shavit, Y. and Müller, W. (1995) Educational qualifications and occupational destinations: a comparative analysis of six countries. Paper presented at the conference on Educational Knowledge and School Curricula of ISA Research Committee 4, Jerusalem, 27-29 Dec. 1995.
58. Treiman, D. J. (1970) Industrialization and social stratification. In Laumann, E. O. (ed.) Social Stratification: Research and Theory for the 1970s. Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis, pp. 207-234.
59. Tyree, A., Semyonov, M., Hodge, R. W. (1979) Gaps and glissandos: inequality, economic development and social mobility in 24 countries. American Sociological Review, 44, 410-424.
60. Wilkinson, G. N. and Rogers, C. E. (1973) Symbolic description of factorial models for analysis of variance. Applied Statistics, 22, 392-399.
61. Wong, R. S. (1990) Understanding cross-national variation in occupational mobility. American Sociological Review, 55, 560-573.
62. Wong, R. S. (1992) Vertical and nonvertical effects in class mobility: cross-national variations. American Sociological Review, 57, 396-410.
63. Xie, Y. (1992) The log-multiplicative layer effect model for comparing mobility tables. American Sociological Review, 57, 380-395.
64. Yamaguchi, K. (1983) The structure of intergenerational occupational mobility: generality and specificity in resources, channels, and barriers. American Journal of Sociology, 88, 718-745.
65. Yamaguchi, K. (1987) Models for comparing mobility tables: toward parsimony and substance. American Sociological Review, 52, 482-494.