Putting the Chicago School debate in proper perspective

Law and Social Inquiry

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 201-207

  Crespi, Gregory S ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031488345     PISSN: 08976546     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-4469.1997.tb00309.x     Document Type: Review

References (10)

1. Crespi, Gregory. 1991. The Mid-Life Crisis of the Law and Economics Movement: Confronting the Problems of Nonfalsifiability and Normative Bias. Notre Dame Law Review 67:231-52.
2. _. 1997. Does the Chicago School Need to Expand Its Curriculum? Law and Social Inquiry 22:149-69.
3. Dau-Schmidt, Kenneth. 1997. Smoking in the Washroom of the Chicago School: A Reply to Crespi. Law and Social Inquiry 22:171-83.
4. Harrison, Jeffrey L. 1997. The Chicago School and the Development of a Comprehensive Legal Theory: A Reply to Professor Crespi. Law and Social Inquiry 22:185-89.
5. Kronman, Anthony. 1980. Wealth Maximization as a Normative Principle. 9 Journal of Legal Studies 9:227-42.
6. Leff, Arthur. 1974. Economic Analysis of Law: Some Realism about Nominalism. Virginia Law Review 60:451-82.
7. Malloy, Robin Paul, and Christopher K. Braun, eds. 1995. Law and Economics: New and Critical Perspectives. New York: Peter Lang Publishers.
8. Posner, Richard. 1992. Economic Analysis of Law. 4th ed. Boston: Little, Brown.
9. Ulen, Thomas S. 1997. Professor Crespi on Chicago. Law and Social Inquiry 22:191-99.
10. Vaughn, Karen. 1994. Austrian Economics in America. New York: Cambridge University Press.