Responses to partner violence: Moving away from deficit models

Journal of Family Psychology

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 339-350

  Hamby, Sherry L ^c   Gray Little, Bernadette ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill   (United States)

^c Behavioral Health   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031485614     PISSN: 08933200     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0893-3200.11.3.339     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Banyard, V. L., & Graham-Bermann, S. A. (1993). Can women cope? A gender analysis of theories of coping and stress. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 17, 303-318.
2. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
3. Bowker, L. H. (1983). Beating wife-beating. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
4. Bowker, L. H. (1993). A battered woman's problems are social, not psychological. In R. Gelles & D. Loseke (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence (pp. 154-165). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
5. Browne, A. (1993). Violence against women by male partners. American Psychologist, 48, 1077-1087.
6. Browne, A. (1995, June). Returning women's strengths into the domestic violence discourse. Paper presented at the Feminism and Domestic Violence conference, Wheaton, MA.
7. Campbell, J. C. (1989). A test of two explanatory models of women's responses to battering. Nursing Research, 38, 18-24.
8. Dobash, R. E., & Dobash, R. (1979). Violence against wives: A case against the patriarchy. New York: Free Press.
9. Dobash, R. P., & Dobash, R. E. (1983). The context-specific approach. In D. Finkelhor, R. Gelles, G. Hotaling, & M. Straus (Eds.), The dark side of families: Current family violence research (pp. 261-276). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
10. Dutton, D. G. (1995). The domestic assault of women: Psychological and criminal justice perspectives. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: UBC Press.
11. Eysenck, H. J. (1990). Biological dimensions of personality. In L. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 244-276). New York: Guilford Press.
12. Ferraro, K. J. (1983). Rationalizing violence: How battered women stay. Victimology, 3-4, 203-212.
13. Flynn, C. P. (1990). Sex roles and women's response to courtship violence. Journal of Family Violence, 5, 83-94.
14. Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Coping and emotion. In A. Monat & R. Lazarus (Eds.), Stress and coping: An anthology (3rd ed.) (pp. 208-227). New York: Columbia University Press.
15. Follingstad, D. R., Hause, E. S., Rutledge, L. L., & Polek, D. S. (1992). Effects of battered women's early responses on later abuse patterns. Violence and Victims, 7, 109-128.
16. Gondolf, E. W. (1988). Battered women as survivors: An alternative to treating learned helplessness. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
17. Graham, D. L. R., Rawlings, E. I., & Rigsby, R. K. (1994). Loving to survive: Sexual terror, men's violence, and women's lives. New York: New York University Press.
18. Graham, D. L. R., Rawlings, E., & Rimini, N. (1988). Survivors of terror: Battered women, hostages, and the Stockholm syndrome. In K. Yllo & M. Bograd (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on wife abuse (pp. 217-233). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
19. Hamby, S. L., Poindexter, V. C., & Gray-Little, B. (1996). Four measures of partner violence: Construct similarity and classification differences. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 127-139.
20. Henton, J., Cate, R., Koval, J., Lloyd, S., & Christopher, S. (1983). Romance and violence in dating relationships. Journal of Family Issues, 4, 467-482.
21. Herbert, T. B., Silver, R. C., & Ellard, J. H. (1991). Coping with an abusive relationship: I. How and why do women stay? Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 311-325.
22. Hoff, L. A. (1990). Battered women as survivors. London: Routledge.
23. Holahan, C. J., & Moos, R. H. (1990). Life stressors, resistance factors, and improved psychological functioning: An extension of the stress resistance paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 909-917.
24. Horton, A. L., & Johnson, B. L. (1993). Profile and strategies of women who have ended abuse. Families in Society, 74, 481-491.
25. Kaufman Kantor, G., & Straus, M. A. (1990). Response of victims and the police to assaults on wives. In M. Straus & R. Gelles (Eds.), Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8,145 families (pp. 473-487). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
26. Koestner, R., & McClelland, D. C. (1990). Perspectives on competence motivation. In L. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 527-548). New York: Guilford Press.
27. Launius, M. H., & Lindquist., C. U. (1988). Learned helplessness, external locus of control, and passivity in battered women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 3, 307-318.
28. Loseke, D. R. (1992). The battered woman and shelters: The social construction of wife abuse. Albany: State University of New York Press.
29. Mahoney, M. R. (1991). Legal images of battered women: Redefining the issue of separation. Michigan Law Review, 90, 1-94.
30. Milburn, N., & D'Ercole, A. (1991). Homeless women: Moving toward a comprehensive model. American Psychologist, 46, 1161-1169.
31. Nurius, P. S., Furrey, J., & Berliner, L. (1992). Coping capacity among women with abusive partners. Violence and Victims, 7, 229-243.
32. Pagelow, M. D. (1984). Family violence. New York: Praeger.
33. Painter, S. L., & Dutton, D. (1985). Patterns of emotional bonding in battered women: Traumatic bonding. International Journal of Women's Studies, 8, 363-375.
34. Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1991). Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
35. Rosewater, L. B. (1988). Battered or schizophrenic? Psychological tests can't tell. In K. Yllo & M. Bograd (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on wife abuse (pp. 200-216). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
36. Rusbult, C. E., & Martz, J. M. (1995). Remaining in an abusive relationship: An investment model analysis of nonvoluntary dependence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 558-571.
37. Schutte, N. S., Malouff, J. M., & Doyle, J. S. (1988). The relationship between characteristics of the victim, persuasive techniques of the batterer, and returning to a battering relationship. The Journal of Social Psychology, 128, 605-610.
38. Smith, M. D. (1987). The incidence and prevalence of woman abuse in Toronto. Violence and Victims, 2, 173-187.
39. Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics Scales. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 75-88.
40. Strube, M. J. (1988). The decision to leave an abusive relationship: Empirical evidence and theoretical issues. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 236-250.
41. Strube, M. J., & Barbour, L. S. (1983). The decision to leave an abusive relationship: Economic dependence and psychological commitment. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45, 785-793.
42. Toro, P. A., Trickett, E. J., Wall, D. D., & Salem, D. A. (1991). Homelessness in the United States: An ecological perspective. American Psychologist, 46, 1208-1218.
43. Walker, L. E. (1979). The batte red woman. New York: Harper Colophon Books.
44. Walker, L. E. (1984). The battered woman syndrome. New York: Springer.
45. Walker, L. E. (1993). The battered woman syndrome is a psychological consequence of abuse. In R. Gelles & D. Loseke (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence (pp. 133-153). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
46. Yllo, K. (1988). Political and methodological debates in wife abuse research. In K. Yllo & M. Bograd (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on wife abuse (pp. 51-74). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.