-
1
-
-
0000184333
-
-
For example, see L. A. McColl, Phys. Rev. 40, 621 (1932).
-
(1932)
Phys. Rev.
, vol.40
, pp. 621
-
-
McColl, L.A.1
-
7
-
-
36549095677
-
-
See, e.g., P. Gueret, E. Marclay, and H. Meier, Appl. Phys. Lett. 53, 1617 (1988).
-
(1988)
Appl. Phys. Lett.
, vol.53
, pp. 1617
-
-
Gueret, P.1
Marclay, E.2
Meier, H.3
-
10
-
-
0000330768
-
-
Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 4, 229
-
A. I. Baz', Yad. Fiz. 4, 252 [Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 4, 229] (1967).
-
(1967)
Yad. Fiz.
, vol.4
, pp. 252
-
-
Baz', A.I.1
-
16
-
-
0347439866
-
-
private communication
-
L. P. Horwitz, private communication. We thank L. P. Horwitz for communication on this point, as well as for a discussion of its relevance to this work.
-
-
-
Horwitz, L.P.1
-
18
-
-
84946640564
-
-
A. Baram, Mol. Phys. 41, 823 (1980); M. Gilibert, A. Baram, I. Last, H. Szichman, and M. Baer, J. Chem. Phys. 99, 3503 (1993); H. Eisenberg, S. Ron, and M. Baer, J. Chem. Phys. 101, 3802 (1994).
-
(1980)
Mol. Phys.
, vol.41
, pp. 823
-
-
Baram, A.1
-
19
-
-
0000938887
-
-
A. Baram, Mol. Phys. 41, 823 (1980); M. Gilibert, A. Baram, I. Last, H. Szichman, and M. Baer, J. Chem. Phys. 99, 3503 (1993); H. Eisenberg, S. Ron, and M. Baer, J. Chem. Phys. 101, 3802 (1994).
-
(1993)
J. Chem. Phys.
, vol.99
, pp. 3503
-
-
Gilibert, M.1
Baram, A.2
Last, I.3
Szichman, H.4
Baer, M.5
-
20
-
-
0001489707
-
-
A. Baram, Mol. Phys. 41, 823 (1980); M. Gilibert, A. Baram, I. Last, H. Szichman, and M. Baer, J. Chem. Phys. 99, 3503 (1993); H. Eisenberg, S. Ron, and M. Baer, J. Chem. Phys. 101, 3802 (1994).
-
(1994)
J. Chem. Phys.
, vol.101
, pp. 3802
-
-
Eisenberg, H.1
Ron, S.2
Baer, M.3
-
21
-
-
0004161838
-
-
Cambridge University, Cambridge
-
W. H. Press, S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling, and B. P. Flannery, Numerical Recipes in C, 2nd edn. (Cambridge University, Cambridge, 1995).
-
(1995)
Numerical Recipes in C, 2nd Edn.
-
-
Press, W.H.1
Teukolsky, S.A.2
Vetterling, W.T.3
Flannery, B.P.4
-
22
-
-
0007736399
-
-
J. A. Stovneng and E. H. Hauge, J. Stat. Phys. 57, 841 (1989). See also comment by M. Bütliker and R. Landauer, ibid 58, 371 (1990), which criticizes their interpretation. Our approach is consistent with the ideas of this comment. However, no solution for the aparenl contradiction between the Larmor times (11) and the oscillating barrier time scale (12) found in the above paper was given in this comment. We suggest the two time scales approach to solve this difficulty.
-
(1989)
J. Stat. Phys.
, vol.57
, pp. 841
-
-
Stovneng, J.A.1
Hauge, E.H.2
-
23
-
-
14044260480
-
-
J. A. Stovneng and E. H. Hauge, J. Stat. Phys. 57, 841 (1989). See also comment by M. Bütliker and R. Landauer, ibid 58, 371 (1990), which criticizes their interpretation. Our approach is consistent with the ideas of this comment. However, no solution for the aparenl contradiction between the Larmor times (11) and the oscillating barrier time scale (12) found in the above paper was given in this comment. We suggest the two time scales approach to solve this difficulty.
-
(1990)
J. Stat. Phys.
, vol.58
, pp. 371
-
-
Bütliker, M.1
Landauer, R.2
|