Noncash income, equivalence scales, and the measurement of economic well-being

Review of Income and Wealth

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 71-88

  Radner, Daniel B ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031478647     PISSN: 00346586     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4991.1997.tb00201.x     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bureau of the Census, Conference on the Measurement of Noncash Benefits, Proceedings, Vol. I, Bureau of the Census, 1986.
2. _, Poverty in the United States: 1992, Current Population Reports, Series P-60-185, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1993a.
3. _, Measuring the Effect of Benefits and Taxes on Income and Poverty: 1992, Current Population Report, Series P-60-186RD, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1993b.
4. Citro, C. F. and R. T. Michael (eds.), Measuring Poverty (A New Approach), National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1995.
5. Danziger, S., J. van der Gaag, E. Smolensky, and M. K. Taussig, Income Transfers and the Economic Status of the Elderly, in M. Moon (ed.), Economic Transfers in the United States, Studies in Income and Wealth, Vol. 49, National Bureau of Economic Research, pp. 239-276, University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London, 1984.
6. Ellwood, D. T. and L. H. Summers, Measuring Income: What Kind Should Be In?, in Conference on the Measurement of Noncash Benefits, Proceedings, Vol. I, pp. 8-27,Bureau of the Census, 1986.
7. Hurd, M. D., Research on the Elderly: Economic Status, Retirement, and Consumption and Saving, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. XXVIII(2), 565-637, June, 1990.
8. Jenkins, S. P. and P. J. Lambert, Ranking Income Distributions When Needs Differ, Review of Income and Wealth, Series 39(4), 337-356, December, 1993.
9. Nelson, J. A., Household Equivalence Scales: Theory versus Policy?, Journal of Labor Economics, Vol. 11(3), 471-493, July, 1993.
10. Phipps, S. and T. A. Garner, Are Equivalence Scales the Same for the United States and Canada?, Review of Income and Wealth, Series 40(1), 1-17, March, 1994.
11. Radner, D. B., The Economic Status of the Aged, Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 55(3), 3-23, Fall, 1992.
12. _, An Assessment of the Economic Status of the Aged, Studies in Income Distribution, No. 16, Social Security Administration, 1993.
13. Smeeding, T. M., Full Income Estimates of the Relative Well-Being of the Elderly and the Nonelderly, in D. J. Slottje (ed.), Research on Economic Inequality, Vol. 1, pp. 83-122, JAI Press, Greenwich, 1989.
14. Smeeding, T. M., P. Saunders, J. Coder, S. Jenkins, J. Fritzell, A. J. M. Hagenaars, R. Hauser, and M. Wolfson, Poverty, Inequality, and Family Living Standards Impacts Across Seven Nations: The Effect of Noncash Subsidies for Health, Education, and Housing, Review of Income and Wealth, Series 39(3), 1-28, September, 1993.
15. Social Security Administration, Social Security Programs in the United States, 1993, Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 56(4), 3-82, Winter, 1993.
16. van der Gaag, J. and E. Smolensky, True Household Equivalence Scales and Characteristics of the Poor in the United States, Review of Income and Wealth, Series 28(1), 17-28, March, 1982.
17. Ward, M. P., The Statistical Measurement of Poverty, in Conference on the Measurement of Noncash Benefits, Proceedings, Vol. 1, pp. 68-95, Bureau of the Census, 1986.
18. Wolfe, B. and R. Moffitt, A New Index to Value In-Kind Benefits, Review of Income and Wealth, Series 37(4), 387-408, December, 1991.