New professionals' preparedness for clinical social work: Supervisors' perspectives

Clinical Social Work Journal

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 351-363

  Miller, Roger R ^a   Robb, J Robin ^b  

^a SMITH COLLEGE   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Clinical social workers; Job demands; Performance evaluations; Supervisors

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031478271     PISSN: 00911674     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1025742730146     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. American Board of Examiners in Clinical Social Work. (1995). Professional development and practice competence in clinical social work. American Board of Examiners in Clinical Social Work. Wilmington, DE.
2. Beless, D. W. (1992). From the executive director. Social Work Education Reports, 40(2): 1-3:
3. Biggerstaff, M., & Eisenberg, R. I. (1989). Summary report: Job analysis verification study. Culpeper, VA: American Association of State Social Work Boards.
4. Borders, L., & Fong, M. (1991). Evaluation of supervision: Brief commentary and research report. The Clinical Supervisor, 9(2): 43-51.
5. Family Service Association of American (1973). Position statement of Family Service agencies regarding graduate schools of social work. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 43, 108-110.
6. Goldstein, E. (1996). What is clinical social work? Looking back to move ahead. Clinical Social Work Journal, 24, 1: 89-104.
7. Harkness, L., & Hensley, H. (1991). Changing the focus of social work supervision: Effects on client satisfaction and generalized contentment. Social Work, 36: 506-512.
8. Seiz, R., & Schwab, A. (1992). Value orientations of clinical social work and practitioners. Clinical Social Work Journal, 20: 323-335.