The Mexican Crisis and the Weakness of the NAFTA Consensus

The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science

Volumn 550, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 130-152

  Morales, Isidro ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE LAS AMÉRICAS PUEBLA   (Mexico)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031476562     PISSN: 00027162     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0002716297550001011     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. U.S. Chamber of Commerce, Oct. 1995.
2. Douglass C. North, Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1993), p. 27.
3. Economic Cooperation and Development, Mexico, OECD Economic Surveys (Paris: OECD, 1992), p. 223.
4. Sidney Weintraub, “Modeling the Industrial Effects of NAFTA,” in North American Free Trade: Assessing the Impact, ed. Nora Lustig et al. (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1992).
5. Gary Clyde Hufbauer and Jeffrey J. Schott, NAFTA: An Assessment, rev. ed. (Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics, 1993), p. 15.
6. El financiero, 18 Sept. 1995, p. 28.
7. Scott Burlingame, Lars Jorgensen, and Michael Lund, North American Integration and the Lessons from Europe (Copenhagen: DJOF, 1994), p. 108.
8. Isidro Morales, “NAFTA and U.S. Foreign Trade Policy: Regionalism as an Option to Foster U.S. Leverage in World Trade Matters,” in Growth, Trade and Integration in Latin America, ed. Weine Karlsson and Akhil Malaki (Stockholm: Stockholm University, Institute of Latin American Studies, 1996).
9. Alan Rugman and Alaine Verbeke, “Foreign Direct Investment and NAFTA: A Conceptual Framework,” in Foreign Investment and NAFTA, ed. Alan Rugman (Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1994), pp. 88, 99.
10. Paul Krugman, “Emerging Market Blues,” Foreign Affairs, pp. 28-44 (July-Aug. 1995).
11. Economist, 26 Aug. 1995, p. 65.
12. Morales, “NAFTA and U.S. Foreign Trade Policy.”
13. Fred Lazar, “Investing in the NAFTA: Just Cause for Walking Away,” Journal of World Trade, 27(5):23 (Oct. 1993).
14. Lourdes P. González, “Más de 170 denuncia antidumping en seis años; resueltas 109,” El financiero, 7 Nov. 1994, p. 29.
15. Miguel Angel Olea Sisniega, “México en el sistema de comercio internacional: Análisis de las negociaciones comerciales internacionales durante el decenio de los ochenta,” in La politíca internacional de México en el decenio de los ochenta, ed. Bernardo Sepúlveda (Mexico: FCE, 1994).
16. José Luis Gaona, “Zona libre,” El financiero, 31 Aug. 1995, p. 20.
17. Claudia Villegas, “Favoreció a EU que Secofi actuara fuera de sus facultades,” El financiero, 4 Sept. 1995, p. 34.
18. Kevin G. Hall, “Dumping Disputes Fail to Quash Mexico's Hopes for US Trade,” Journal of Commerce, 8 Nov. 1994.
19. Hall, “Dumping Disputes.”
20. José Luis Gaona, “Imposible detener las importaciones acereras con cuotas compensatorias,” El financiero, 24 Apr. 1995, p. 24.
21. Enrique R. Vilatela, “Oportunidades para exportar” (Proceedings, Banco Nacional de Comercio Exterior, Mexico, Sept. 1995).
22. James M. Cypher, “Renascent Rivalry: Global Low-Wage Manufacturing, U.S. Decline, and Emergent Regionalism,” in Perspectives and Issues in International Political Economy, ed. Chronis Polychroniou (Westport, CT: Praeger, 1992).
23. United Nations Center on Transnational Corporations, Foreign Direct Investment and Industrial Restructuring in Mexico, ST/CTC/SER.A/18 (New York: UNCTC, 1992), p. 48.
24. Foreign Direct Investment and Industrial Restructuring in Mexico, p. 46.
25. John H. Dunning, The Globalization of Business (London: Routledge, 1993), pp. 315-329.
26. Cypher, “Renascent Rivalry”.
27. Peter Morici, “Free Trade in the Americas: A U.S. Perspective,” in The Premise and the Promise: Free Trade in the Americas, ed. Silvia Saborio (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, 1992).
28. Horacio Sobarzo, “A General Equilibrium Analysis of the Gains from Trade for the Mexican Economy of a North American Free Trade Agreement” (Working Paper no. II-91, El Colegio de México, 1991), p. 38.