"Substitutes for leadership: Their meaning and measurement" - An historical assessment

Leadership Quarterly

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 113-116

  P Howell, Jon ^a  

^a NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031475948     PISSN: 10489843     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1048-9843(97)90011-4     Document Type: Note

References (24)

1. Bass B.M. Leadership and performance beyond expectations. 1985;Free Press, New York.
2. Bennis W.G., Nanus B. Leaders: The strategies for taking charge. 1985;Harper & Row, New York.
3. Burns J.M. Leadership. 1978;Harper & Row, New York.
4. Burstein J., Martin E. Computer information systems. 1989;Dryden Press, Homewood, IL.
5. Conger J.A., Kanungo R.N. Charismatic leadership: the elusive factor in organizational effectiveness. 1988;Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
6. DeVries R.E. Measuring substitutes for leadership using the concept of need for leadership: a cross-sectional research. 1995;Work and Organizational Research Center, Tilburg University, The Netherlands.
7. Dorfman P.W., Howell J.P., Cotton B.C.G., Tate U. Leadership within the"discontinuous hierarchy" structure of the military: are effective leadership behaviors similar within and across command stru. Clark K.E., Clark M.B., Campbell D.P. Impact of leadership. 1992;399-416 Center for Creative Leadership, Greensboro, NC.
8. Fiedler F.E. A theory of leadership effectiveness. 1967;McGraw-Hill, New York.
9. Hackman J.R., Oldham G., Janson R., Purdy K. A new strategy for job enrichment. California Management Review. (Summer):1975;57-71.
10. Hersey P., Blanchard K.H. Management of organizational behavior. 3rd ed. 1977;Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
11. House R.J. A path-goal theory of leader effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly. 16:1971;321-339.
12. Howell J.P., Dorfman P.W., Kerr S. Moderator variables in leadership research. Academy of Management Review. 11:1986;88-102.
13. Kerr S., Jermier J.M. Substitutes for leadership: their meaning and measurement. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. 22:1978;375-403.
14. Manz C.C., Sims H.P. Jr. Leading workers to lead themselves: the external leadership of self-managing work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly. 32:1987;106-128.
15. Manz C.C., Sims H.P. Jr. Self-management as a substitute for leadership: a social learning theory perspective. Academy of Management Review. 5:1980;361-367.
16. Podsakoff P.M., MacKenzie S.B., Fetter R. Substitutes for leadership and the management of professionals. Leadership Quarterly. 4:(1):1993;1-44.
17. Podsakoff P.M., Niehoff B.P., MacKenzie S.B., Williams W.L. Do substitutes for leadership really substitute for leadership? An empirical examination of Kerr and Jermier's situational leadership model. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 54:1993;1-44.
18. Rousseau D.N. Technological differences in job characteristics, employee satisfaction and motivation. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. 19:(1):1977;18-42.
19. Vecchio R.P. Theoretical and empirical examination of cognitive resource theory. Journal of Applied Psychology. 75:(2):1990;141-147.
20. Villa J., Howell J.P., Dorfman P.W. Problems with detecting moderators in current leadership research. 1996;. Presented and published in the Electronic Proceedings of the Academy of Management meeting, Cincinnati, August.
21. Vroom V.H., Yetton P.W. Leadership and decision making. 1973;University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh.
22. Walton M. The Deming management method. 1988;Putnam Publishers, New York.
23. Yukl G. Leadership in organizations. 3rd ed. 1994;Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
24. Yukl G.A. Toward a behavioral theory of leadership. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. 6:1971;414-440.