Initial experience with helical CT and 3D reconstruction in therapeutic planning of cerebral AVMs: Comparison with 3D time-of-flight MRA and digital subtraction angiography

Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 1997, Pages 811-817

  Tanaka, Hisashi ^a,c   Numaguchi, Yuji ^a   Konno, Shoko ^b   Shrier, David A ^a   Shibata, Dean K ^a   Patel, Uresh ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b ST MARIANNA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^c OSAKA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Japan)

Author keywords

Computed tomography angiography (CTA); Computed tomography, helical; Computed tomography, three dimensional; Image reconstruction; Magnetic resonance angiography; Malformations, arteriovenous

Indexed keywords

ANGIOGRAPHY; COLOR; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE;

ARTERIOVENOUS MALFORMATION; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY, HELICAL; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; IMAGES RECONSTRUCTION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALFORMATION, ARTERIOVENOUS; MR ANGIOGRAPHY; SHADED SURFACES;

IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION;

METHEMOGLOBIN;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BRAIN ARTERIOVENOUS MALFORMATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCHOOL CHILD; SPIRAL COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 0031474933     PISSN: 03638715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00004728-199709000-00030     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Schwartz RB, Tice HM, Hooten SM, Hsu L, Stieg PE. Evaluation of cerebral aneurysms with helical CT: correlation with conventional angiography and MR angiography. Radiology 1994;192: 717-22.
2. Alberico RA, Patel M, Casey S, Jacobs B, Maguire W, Decker R. Evaluation of the circle of Willis with three-dimensional CT angiography in patients with suspected intracranial aneurysms. AJNR 1995;16:1571-8.
3. Liang EY, Chan M, Hsiang JHK, et al. Detection and assessment of intracranial aneurysms: value of CT angiography with shaded-surface display. AJR 1995;165:1497-502.
4. Dorsch NWC, Young N, Kingston RJ, Compton JS. Early experience with spiral CT in the diagnosis of intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 1995;36:230-8.
5. Vieco PT, Shuman WP, Alsofrom GF, Gross CE. Detection of circle of Willis aneurysms in patients with acute subarachnoid hemorrhage: a comparison of CT angiography and digital subtraction angiography. AJR 1995;165:425-30.
6. Hsiang JNK, Liang EY, Lam JMK, Zhu X-L, Poon WS. The role of computed tomographic angiography in the diagnosis of intracranial aneurysms and emergent aneurysm clipping. Neurosurgery 1996;38:481-7.
7. Ogawa T, Okudera T, Noguchi K, et al. Cerebral aneurysms: evaluation with three-dimensional CT angiography. AJNR 1996; 17:447-54.
8. Hope JKA, Wilson JL, Thomson FJ. Three-dimensional CT angiography in the detection and characterization of intracranial berry aneurysms. AJNR 1996;17:439-45.
9. Harbaugh RE, Schlusselberg DS, Jeffery R, Hayden S, Cromwell LD, Pluta D. Three-dimensional computerized tomography angio-graph in the diagnosis of cerebrovascular disease. J Neurosurg 1992;76:408-14.
10. Harbaugh RE, Schlusselberg DS, Jeffery R, et al. Three-dimensional computed tomographic angiography in the preoperative evaluation of cerebrovascular lesions. Neurosurgery 1995;36: 320-7.
11. Marks MP, Katz DA. Spiral CT angiography of the cerebrovascular circulation. In: Fishman EK, Jeffrey RB, eds. Spiral CT: principles, techniques, and clinical applications. New York: Raven Press, 1995:197-207.
12. Rieger J, Hosten N, Neumann K, et al. Initial clinical experience with spiral CT and 3D arterial reconstruction in intracranial aneurysms and arteriovenous malformations. Neuroradiology 1996;38: 245-51.
13. Bova FJ, Friedman WA. Stereotactic angiography: an inadequate database for radiosurgery? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1991;20: 891-5.
14. Blatt DR, Friedman WA, Bova FJ. Modifications based on computed tomographic imaging in planning the radiosurgical treatment of arteriovenous malformations. Neurosurgery 1993;33:588-96.
15. Elisevich K, Cunningham IA, Assis L. Size estimation and magnification error in radiographic imaging: implications for classification of arteriovenous malformations. AJNR 1995;16:531-8.
16. Camarata PJ, Heros RC. Arteriovenous malformations of the brain. In: Youmans JR, Becker DP, Dunsker SB, et al., eds. Neurological surgery. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1996:1381-2.
17. Huston J, Rufenacht DA, Ehman RL, Wiebers DO. Intracranial aneurysms and vascular malformations: comparison of time-of-flight and phase-contrast MR angiography. Radiology 1991;181: 721-30.
18. Kesava P, Baker E, Mehta M, Turski P. Staging of arteriovenous malformations using three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography and volume-rendered displays of surface anatomy. AJR 1996;167:605-9.
19. Spiegelmann R, Friedman WA, Bova FJ. Limitations of angiographic target localization in planning radiosurgical treatment. Neurosurgery 1992;30:619-24.
20. Kondziolka D, Lunsford LD, Kanal E, Talagala L. Stereotactic magnetic resonance angiography for targeting in arteriovenous malformation radiosurgery. Neurosurgery 1994;35:585-91.
21. Kasales CJ, Hopper KD, Ariola DN, et al. Reconstructed helical CT scans: improvement in z-axis resolution compared with overlapped and nonoverlapped conventional CT scans. AJR 1995;164: 1281-4.
22. Huston J, Ehman R. Comparison of time-of-flight and phase-contrast MR neuroangiographic techniques. Radiographies 1993; 13:5-19.
23. Meuli RA, Verdun FR, Bochud FO, Emsley L, Fankhauser H. Assessment of MR image deformation for stereotactic neurosurgery using a tagging sequence. AJNR 1994;15:45-59.