Foreign bodies and intraperitoneal post-operative adhesions

Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants

Volumn 7, Issue 3-4, 1997, Pages 235-242

  Duron, Jean Jacques ^a   Olivier, Léon ^b  

^a Service de Chirurgie Digestive   (France)

^b PITIÉ SALPÊTRIÈRE HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

Adhesions; Cellulose textile fibers; Corn starch; Foreign bodies; Sutures

Indexed keywords

ADHESION; CELLULOSE DERIVATIVES; PARTICLES (PARTICULATE MATTER); POWDERS; STARCH; SURGERY; SYNTHETIC TEXTILE FIBERS;

POST OPERATIVE ADHESION; SUTURES;

IMPLANTS (SURGICAL);

CELLULOSE; STARCH;

ADULT; AGED; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOREIGN BODY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; LAPAROTOMY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NONHUMAN; PARTICULATE MATTER; PERITONEUM ADHESION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; POWDER; RAT; REOPERATION; REVIEW; SUTURE; TEXTILE;

ADHESIONS; ANIMALS; FEMALE; GRANULOMA, FOREIGN-BODY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERITONEAL DISEASES; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; POWDERS; RATS; RATS, WISTAR; SURGICAL SPONGES; SUTURES;

EID: 0031473809     PISSN: 10506934     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (17)

1. Weibel, M. A. and Majno, G., Peritoneal adhesions and their relation to abdominal surgery: a postmortem study, Am. J. Surg., 1973, 126:345-355.
2. Duron, J. J., Olivier, L., Khosrovani, C., Gineste, D., Jost, J.L., and Keilani, K., Natural history of the postoperative intraperitoneal adhesions. An actual issue, J. Chir., 1993, 130:385-390.
3. Ellis, H., The cause and prevention of post-operative intraperitoneal adhesions, Surg. Gynecol. Obstet., 1971, 133:497-511.
4. Fayez, J. A., An assessment of the role of operative laparoscopy in tuboplasty, Fertil. Steril., 1983, 39:476-479.
5. Bastug, D., Trammel, W., Boland, J. P., Mantz, E. P. and Tilley, E. H., Laparoscopic adhesiolysis for small bowel obstruction, Surg. Lap. Endo., 1991, 1:259-262.
6. Lundorff, P., Hahlein, M., Kallfert, B., Thornburn, J. and Lindblom, B., Adhesions formation after lapaoscopic surgery in tubal pregnancy: a randomized trial versus laparotomy, Pert. Ster., 1991, 55:911-915.
7. Hershlag, A., Diamond, M. P., and DeCherney, A. H., Adhesiolysis, Clin. Obstet. Gynecol., 1991, 34:395-402.
8. McEntee, G., Mulvin, D., McCullough, N., Naeeder, S., Farah, S., Badurdeen, M. S., Ferraro, V., Cham, C., and Gillham, N., Current spectrum of intestinal obstruction, Br. J. Surg., 1987, 74:976-980.
9. Menzies, D. and Ellis, H., Intestinal obstruction from adhesion. How big is the problem?, Ann. R. Coll. Sur. Eng., 1990, 70:60-63.
10. Stewart, R. M., Page, C. P., Brender, J., Schwesinger, W. and Eisenhut, D., The incidence and risk of early postoperative small bowel obstruction. A cohort study, Am. J. Surg., 1987, 154:643-645.
11. Saxen, L. and Myllärniemi, H., Foreign material and postoperative adhesions, N. Eng.J. Med. 1973, 279:200-202.
12. Myllärniemi, H., Foreign material in adhesion after abdominal surgery, Act. Chir. Scand., 1977, 377:1-48.
13. Luijendijk, R. W., de Lange, D. C. D., Wanters, C. C. A. R., Hop, W. C. J., Duron J. J., Paillier, J. L., Camprodon, B. R., Holmdahl, L., Van Geldorps, H. J., and Jeekel, J., Foreign material in post-operative adhesions, Ann. Surg. 1996, 223:242-248.
14. Duron, J. J., Keilani, K., Barrat, C., Chamagne, A. M., and Olivier, L., Contamination of the peritoneal cavity by micro foreign bodies, Chirurgie, 1996, 121:175-186.
15. Zühlke, H. V., Lorenz, E. M. P., Straub, E. M., and Sauvas, V., Pathology and classification of adhesions, Langenbecks Arch. Chirm, 1990, 345:1009-1016.
16. German, W. M., Dusting powder granulomas following surgery, Surg. Gynd. Obstet., 1943, 78:501-507.
17. Bridger, J. B. and Whiting, H. W., Parietal peritoneal healing in rats J. Path. Bact., 1964, 87:123-130.