Cognitive - Affective processes in psychotherapeutic interaction;Affektive Beziehungsmuster. Was kann die differenzierte Betrachtung der Beziehungsmuster zum Verstandnis psychotherapeutischer Veranderungen beitragen?

Psychotherapeut

Volumn 42, Issue 6, 1997, Pages 356-361

  Bänninger Huber, Eva ^a   Widmer, Christine ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Affective regulation; Chicken trap; Facial expression; Guilt; Psychotherapeutic interaction; Relationship patterns

Indexed keywords

AFFECT; ARTICLE; COGNITION; FACIAL EXPRESSION; GUILT; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; PSYCHOTHERAPY;

EID: 0031469267     PISSN: 09356185     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s002780050087     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Bänninger-Huber E (1992) Prototypical affective microsequences in psychotherapeutic interaction. Psychother Res 2:291-306
2. Bänninger-Huber E (1995) Die Untersuchung von Schuldgefühlen in der psychotherapeutischen Interaktion. In: Koch G (Hrsg) Auge und Affekt. Fischer, Frankfurt a M, S 39-56
3. Bänninger-Huber E, Widmer C (1995) What can the psychology of emotion contribute to an understanding of psychoanalytic processes? A new approach to the investigation of guilt feelings and envy in psychotherapeutic interaction. In: Boothe B, Hirsig R, Helminger A, Meier Faber B, Volkart R (eds) Perception - evaluation - interpretation. Swiss Monographs in Psychology, vol 3. Hogrefe & Huber, Seattle, pp 43-50
4. Beutler L, Crago M (1991) (eds) Psychotherapy research. An international review of programmatic studies. Am Psychol Assoc, Washington
5. Ekman P, Friesen WV (1978) Facial Action Coding System (FACS): manual. Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto
6. Fretter PB, Bucci W, Broitman J, Silberschatz G, Curtis JT (1994) How the patient's plan relates to the concept of transference. Psychother Res 4:58-72
7. Horowitz MJ, Merluzzi TV, Ewert M, Ghannam JH, Hartley D, Stinson CH (1991) Role-relationship models configuration (RRMC). In: Horowitz MJ (ed) Person schemas and maladaptive interpersonal patterns. Univ Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 115-154
8. Luborsky L, Crits-Cristoph P (1990) Understanding transference. The core conflictual relationship method. Basic Books, New York
9. Lüthy A-M, Widmer C (1992) A model-oriented representation of superego rules. In: Leuzingr-Bohleber M, Schneider H, Pfeifer R (eds) "Two butterflies on my head" - Psychoanalysis in the interdisciplinary scientific dialogue. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 197-214
10. Minsky M (1975) A framework for representing knowledge. In: Winston PH (ed)The psychology of computer vision. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 211-280
11. Moser U, Zeppelin Iv, Schneider W (1991) The regulation of cognitive-affective processes: a new psychoanalytic model. In: Moser U, Zeppelin Iv (eds) Cognitive-affective processes: new ways of psychoanalytic modeling. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 87-134
12. Orlinsky DE, Grawe K, Parks BK (1994) Processand outcome in psychotherapy. In: Bergin AE, Garfield SL (eds) Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change. Wiley, New York, pp 270-376
13. Stern DN (1985) The interpersonal world of the infant. A view from psychoanalysis and developmental psychology. Basic Books, New York
14. Weiss J, Sampson H and the Mount Zion Psychotherapy Research Group (1986) The psychoanalytic process. Guilford Press, New York
15. Widmer C (1995) Erzählte Schuldgefühle und ihre Entsprechung in der therapeutischen Interaktion: Eine Analyse von erzählten und auftretenden Beziehungsmustern anhand eines Frames. Unveröffentlichte Dissertation. Psychologisches Institut der Universität Zürich