The impact of a treatment process for substance users as a function of their degree of exposure to treatment

Substance Use and Misuse

Volumn 32, Issue 14, 1997, Pages 1993-2011

  Brochu, Serge ^a   Landry, Michel ^b   Bergeron, Jacques ^a   Chiocchio, François ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b Prof Serv Alternatives D   (Canada)

^c Rech Intervention Substances P   (Canada)

Author keywords

Alcohol; Drugs; Exposure; Impact; Treatment effectiveness

Indexed keywords

ACUPUNCTURE; ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR MODIFICATION; DISEASE SEVERITY; DRUG DEPENDENCE TREATMENT; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GROUP THERAPY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELAXATION TRAINING; SELF HELP; SUBSTANCE ABUSE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0031468616     PISSN: 10826084     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/10826089709035616     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. ALLISON, M., and HUBBARD, R. L. (1985). Drug abuse treatment process: A review of the literature. Int. J. Addict. 20: 1321-1345.
2. ANGLIN, M. D., and HSER, Y. I. (1990). Treatment of drug abuse. In M. Tonry and J. Q. Wilson (Eds.), Drugs and Crime (pp. 393-460). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
3. BERGERON, J., LANDRY, M., ISHAK, A., VAUGEOIS, P., and TRÉPANIER, M. (1992). Validation d'un instrument d'évaluation de la gravité des problèmes reliés à la consommation de drogues et d'alcool: l'Indice de Gravité d'une Toxicomanie (IGT) [Validation of an Evaluation Instrument of the Severity of Alcohol and Drug Related Problems: Addiction Severity Index (ASI)]. Montréal: RISQ.
4. BROCHU, S., LANDRY, M., BERGERON, J., and CHIOCCHIO, F. (1995). Rapport de recherche sur l'efficacité du traitement à Domrémy-Montréal (Research Report on the Impact of Domremy-Montréal Treatment Program). Montréal: International Centre for Comparative Criminology.
5. CHAMBERLAND, C. (1990). Portrait de la littérature québécoise en toxicomanie. Dossier II: La réadaptation (State of the Art about Quebec Literature on Addiction: Treatment Program). Québec: Department of Health and Social Services.
6. CHICK, J., RITSON, B., CONNAUGHTON, J., STEWART, A., and CHICK, J. (1988). Advice versus extended treatment for alcoholism: A controlled study. Br. J. Addict. 83: 159-170.
7. COLLINS, J. J., and ALLISON, M. (1983). Legal coercion and treatment for drug abuse. Hosp. Community Psychiatry 34: 1145-1149.
8. DE LEON, G. (1988). Legal pressure in therapeutic communities. J. Drug Issues 18(4): 625-640.
9. EDWARDS, G., ORFORD, J., EGERT, S., GUTHRIE, S., HAWKER, A., HENSMAN, C., MITCHESON, M., OPPENHEIMER, E., and TAYLOR, C. (1977). Alcoholism: A controlled trial of "treatment" and "advice." J. Stud. Alcohol 38: 1004-1031.
10. ELIANY, M., and RUSH, B. (1992). L'efficacité des programmes de prévention et de réhabilitation de l'alcoolisme et d'autres toxicomanies. Rapport technique de base sur la Stratégie canadienne antidrogue (Impact of Alcoholism and Addiction Prevention and Treatment Programs). Ottawa: Health and Welfare Canada.
11. FAUPEL, C. E. (1991). Shooting Dope: Career Pattern of Hard-Core Heroin Users. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida Press.
12. FRENCH, M. T., ZARKIN, G. A., HUBBARD, R. L., and RACHAL, J. V. (1993). The effects of time in drug abuse treatment and employment on posttreatment drug use and criminal activity. Am. J. Drug Alcohol Abuse 19(1): 19-33.
13. FRIGON, J-Y., and LAURENCELLE, L. (1993). Analysis of covariance: A proposed algorithm. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 53(1): 1-18.
14. HUBBARD, R. L., MARSDEN, M. E., RACHAL, J. V., HARWOOD, H. J., CAVANAUGH, E. R., and GINZBURG, H. M. (1989). Drug Abuse Treatment: A National Study of Effectiveness. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
15. HUITEMA, B. E. (1980). The Analysis of Covariance and Alternatives. New York, NY: Wiley.
16. JACOBSON, G. R. (1989). A comprehensive approach to pretreatment evaluation. In R. K. Hester and W. R. Millen (Eds.), Handbook of Alcoholism Treatment Approaches. New York, NY: Pergamon Press.
17. KANG, S. Y., and DE LEON, G. (1993). Criminal involvement of cocaine users enrolled in a methadone treatment program. Addiction 88(3): 395-404.
18. KOSTEN, T. R., ROUNSAVILLE, B., and KLEBER, H. D. (1983). Concurrent validity of the Addiction Severity Index. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 10(171): 606-610.
19. LANDRY, M., BERGERON, J., and BROCHU, S., (1995) Les rapports auto-révélés sur les effets du traitement: peut-on s'y fier? International Institute on the Prevention and Treatment of Drug Dependence. Trieste, 11-16 June.
20. LEUKEFELD, C., MATTHEWS, T., and CLAYTON, R. (1992). Treating the drug-abusing offender. J. Ment. Health Adm. 19(1): 76-82.
21. LOVELL, M. R., FRANSEN, M. D., and GOLDEN, C. J. (1987). Statistical techniques in neuropsychology: Analysis of covariance. Int. J. Clin. Neuropsychol. 9(2): 4955.
22. McLELLAN, T. A., LUBORSKY, L., WOODY, G. E., and O'BRIEN, C. P. (1980). An improved diagnostic evaluation instrument for substance abuse patients - The A.S.I. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 168(1): 26-33.
23. McLELLAN, T. A., LUBORSKY, L., CACCIOLA, J., GRIFFITH, G., EVANS, F., BARR, H. L., and O'BRIEN, C. P. New data from the Addiction Severity Index. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 173(7): 412-423.
24. MILLER, W. R., and HESTER, R. K. (1986). The effectiveness of alcoholism treatment: What research reveals. In W. R. Miller and N. Heather (Eds.), Treating Addictive Behaviors: Processes of Change (pp. 121-174). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
25. MOOS, R. H., CRONKITE, R. C., and FINNEY, J. W. (1982). A conceptual framework for alcoholism treatment evaluation. In E. M. Pattison and E. Kaufman (Eds.), Encyclopedic Handbook of Alcoholism (pp. 1120-1139). New York, NY: Gardner Press.
26. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON ALCOHOL ABUSE AND ALCOHOLISM (1985). Research Strategies in Alcoholism Treatment Research (Treatment Handbook Series). Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services.
27. OCKERT, D. (1984). Evaluation of Treatment for Cocaine Abusers. New York, NY: Dissertation Abstracts International (Doctoral Thesis, Columbia University).
28. ORFORD, J., OPPENHEIMER, E., and EDWARDS, G. (1976). Abstinence or control: The outcome for excessive drinkers two years after consultation. Behav. Res. Ther. 14: 409-418.
29. SIDDALL, J. W., and CONWAY, G. L. (1988). Interactional variables associated with retention and success in residential drug treatment. Int. J. Addict. 23(12): 1241-1254.
30. SOBELL, M. B., and SOBELL, L. C. (1982). Alcoholism outcome evaluation methodology. In National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Prevention Intervention and Treatment Concerns and Models (pp. 293-321) (Alcohol and Health Monograph; 3: DHHS Publication ADM 82-1192). Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
31. TIMS, F. M., FLETCHER, B. W., and HUBBARD, R. L. (1991). Treatment outcomes for drug abuse clients. NIDA Res. Monog. Ser. (Improving Drug Abuse Treatment). 106: 93-113.
32. VAN STELLE, K. R., MAUSER, E., and MOBERG, D. P. (1994). Recidivism to the criminal justice system of substance-abusing offenders diverted into treatment. Crime Delinq. 40(2): 175-196.