Survival, height and health status of 20-year-old pinus sylvestris and pinus contorta after different scarification treatments in a harsh boreal climate

Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 340-350

  Hansson, Per ^a   Karlman, Margareta ^a  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Fungal disease; Instability; Lodgepole pine; Predisposing factor; Scleroderris; Snow

Indexed keywords

PINUS CONTORTA; PINUS SYLVESTRIS;

EID: 0031468461     PISSN: 02827581     EISSN: 16511891     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02827589709355421     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Alexandersson, H., Karlström, C., and McCann-Larsson, S., 1991. Temperature and precipitation in Sweden 1961–90 Reference normals. Swedish Meteorol. Hydrol. Inst., Rapporter, meteorologi, 81:34 ISBN 99–1331950–1. (In Swedish with English summary.)
2. Anon. 1977. Monthly summary of weather and water supply in Sweden. Swed. Meteorol. Hydrol. Inst., 59:1–13. (In Swedish.)
3. Anon. 1979. Skogsstyrelsens föreskrifter och allmänna råd till Skogsvárdslagen (SKSFS 1979:3; 429), 64Jönköping, Sweden:National Board of Forestry. ISSN 0347–5212. (In Swedish.)
4. Anon. 1989. SAS/STAT™ User's Guide Version 6, 4th Edition, Vol. 2, 846Cary, NC:SAS Institute Inc. ISBN 1–55544–376–1.
5. Anon. 1994. Skogsvårdslagen. Handbok, 66Jönköping, Sweden:National Board of Forestry. ISBN 91–88462–11–0. (In Swedish.)
6. Bärring, U., 1965. On the importance of scalping and some other problems connected with planting of Pinus silves-tris L. and Picea abies. Karst. Stud. For. Suec., 24:80 (In Swedish with English summary.)
7. Blomqvist, S., 1981. Experiments with Pinus contorta. Sver. Skogsvårdsförb. Tidskr., 79:42–72. (In Swedish with English summary.)
8. Dunn, O. J., 1961. Multiple comparisons among means. J. Ame. Stat. Assoc., 56:52–54.
9. Eiche, V., 1966. Cold damage and plant mortality in experimental provenance plantations with Scots pine in northern Sweden. Stud. For. Suec., 36:218
10. Eklund, B., and Huss, E., 1946. Investigations on old forest cultivations in northern Sweden. Medd. Statens Skogs-forskn. Inst., 35(6):104 (In Swedish with English summary.)
11. Elfving, B., and Norgren, O., 1993. “ Volume yield superiority of lodgepole pine compared to Scots pine in Sweden ”. In Pinus contorta—from untamed forest to domesticated crop, Report 11 Edited by:Lindgren, D., 69–80. Umeå:Dept. For. Gen. and Plant Physiol., Swed. Univ. Agric. Sci. ISSN 0348–7954.
12. Ericsson, A., Lindgren, A., and Mattsson, A., 1983. Effects of cold storage and planting period on subsequent growth, starch and nitrogen content in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) and Norway spruce (Picea abies) seedlings. Stud. For. Suec., 165:17
13. Ericsson, T., 1993. Provenance qualities of the Pinus contorta breeding base in Sweden, Report No. 4 33Uppsala:Forestry Research Institute of Sweden. ISBN 99–1843452-X.
14. Ericsson, T., 1994. Lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta var. latifolia) breeding in Sweden—results and prospects based on early evaluations, 32Dept. For. Gen. Plant Physiol., Swed. Univ. Agric. Sci. ISBN 91–576–4865–4.
15. Eriksson, G., Andersson, S., Eiche, V., Ifver, J., and Persson, A., 1980. Severity index and transfer on survival and volume production of Pinus sylvestris in northern Sweden. Stud. For. Suec., 156:32
16. Fries, C., 1993. Development of planted Pinus sylvestris and P contorta after soil preparation in a northern climate. Scand. J. For. Res., 8:73–80.
17. Hagner, M., 1989. “ The influence of microenvironment upon survival and growth in Pinus sylvestris ”. In Forest Regeneration at Northern Latitudes Close to the Timberline, General Technical Report PNW-GTR-247 Edited by:Martinsson, O., Packee, E. C., Gasbarro, A., and Lawson, T., 33–38. Portland, US:Pacific Northwest Res. Stn., US Dept. Agric, Forest Service.
18. Hagner, M., and Jonsson, C., 1995. Survival after planting without soil preparation for pine and spruce seedlings protected from Hylobius abietis by physical and chemical shelters. Scand. J. For. Res., 10:225–234.
19. Hagner, S., 1983. Pinus contorta:Sweden's third conifer. Forest Ecol. Manage., 6:185–199.
20. Hansson, L., 1985. Damage by wildlife, especially small rodents, to North American Pinus contorta introduced into Sweden. Can. J. For. Res., 15:1167–1171.
21. Jalkanen, R., 1985. Diebacks of Scots pine due to unfavourable climate in Lapland. Aquilo Series Botanica, 23:75–79.
22. Karlman, M., 1984. Pathogens and other threats to Pinus contorta in northern Sweden, 212Dept. of Ecol. Bot., Univ. of Umeå. ISBN 91–7174–168–2.
23. Karlman, M., 1986. Damage to Pinus contorta in northern Sweden with special emphasis on pathogens. Stud. For. Suec., 176:42
24. Karlman, M., 1987. Dags att omvärdera contortan i kärvt klimat. Skogen, 7 (87):6–9. (In Swedish.)
25. Karlman, M., 1989. Gremmeniella—ett orostecken. Skogen, 2 (89):56–59. (In Swedish.)
26. Karlman, M., 1993. “ The Gremmeniella disease situation on lodgepole pine in northern Sweden ”. In Pinus contorta—from untamed forest to domesticated crop, Report 11 Edited by:Lindgren, D., 335–349. Umeå:Dept. of For. Gen. and Plant Physiol., Swed. Univ. Agric. Sci. ISSN 0348–7954.
27. Karlman, M., 1994. Nya svåra angrepp av Gremmeniella på contortatall i norr. Skogen, 11 (94):70–71. (In Swedish.)
28. Karlman, M., Hansson, P., and Witzell, J., 1994. Scleroderris canker on lodgepole pine introduced in northern Sweden. Can. J. For. Res., 24:1948–1959.
29. Kullman, L., 1981. Recent tree-limit dynamics of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) in the southern Scandes. Wahlenbergia, 8:67
30. Lähde, E., 1978. Effect of soil treatment on physical properties of the soil and on the development of Scots pine and Norway spruce seedlings. Commun. Inst. For. Fenn., 94(5):59 (In Finnish with English summary.)
31. Lines, R., 1980. Stability of Pinus contorta in relation to wind and snow. In Pinus contorta as an Exotic Species, Research Notes No. 30 209–219. Garpenberg:Dept. of For. Genetics, Swed. Univ. Agric. Sci. ISBN 91–576–0710–9.
32. Marosy, M., Patton, R. F., and Upper, C. D., 1989. A conducive day concept to explain the effect of low temperature on the development of Scleroderris shoot blight. Phytopathology, 79:1293–1301.
33. Martinsson, O., 1986. Tap root formation and early root/ shoot ratio of Pinus contorta and Pinus sylvestris. Scand. J. For. Res., 1:233–242.
34. Norgren, O., 1995. Growth differences between Pinus sylvestris and Pinus contorta, 22Dept. of Silviculture, Swed. Univ. Agric. Sci. ISBN 91–576–5003–9.
35. Norgren, O., 1996. Growth analysis of Scots pine and lodgepole pine seedlings. Forest Ecol. Manage., 86:15–26.
36. Olsson, H., 1982. Results of artificial regeneration in northern Sweden—Description and analysis of 24 regeneration areas, Report No. 7 100Dept of Silviculture, Swed. Univ. Agric. Sci. (In Swedish with English summary.) ISBN 91–576–1066–5.
37. Örlander, G., 1986. Effect of planting and scarification on the water relations in planted seedlings of Scots pine. Stud. For. Suec., 173:17
38. Persson, B., 1994. Effects of provenance transfer on survival in nine experimental series with Pinus sylvestris (L) in northern Sweden. Scand. J. For. Res., 9:275–287.
39. Persson, B., and Ståhl, E. G., 1990. Survival and yield of Pinus sylvestris L. as related to provenance transfer and spacing at high altitudes in northern Sweden. Scand. J. For. Res., 5:381–395.
40. Pohtila, E., and Pohjola, T., 1985. Soil preparation in reforestaion of Scots pine in Lapland. Silva Fenn., 19:245–270. (In Finnish with English summary.)
41. Remröd, J., 1969. Swedish trials with Pinus contorta var. latifolia, Årsbok Föreningen skogsträdsförädling 1969 121–124. (In Swedish with English summary.)
42. Remröd, J., 1976. Choosing Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) provenances in Northern Sweden, 1–132. Stockholm, Sweden:Res. Notes. Dept. For. Genet., Royal Coll. For. ISBN 99–0109467–4. (In Swedish with English summary.)
43. Remröd, J., 1977. Lodgepole pine in Sweden. Kungl. Skogs Lantbruksakad. Tidskr., 116:119–149. (In Swedish with English summary.)
44. Roll-Hansen, F., 1975. Phacidium infestans on dwarf plants of Pinus sylvestris. Eur. J. For. Path., 5:1–7.
45. Roll-Hansen, F., Roll-Hanssen, H., and Skroppa, T., 1992. Gremmeniella abietina, Phacidium infestans and other causes of damage in alpine, young pine plantations in Norway. Eur. J. For. Path., 22:77–94.
46. Romell, L.-G., and Malmström, C., 1944. The ecology of lichen-pine forest experiments (1922–42) by the late Dr H. Hesselman. Medd. Statens Skogsforskn. Inst., 34:544–625. (In Swedish with English summary.)
47. Rosvall, O., 1994. Stability in lodgepole pine and resistance to wind and snow. Forestry Research Institute of Sweden, Redogörelse No. 2 47 (In Swedish with English summary.) ISNN 1103–4580
48. Skilling, D. D., and Riemenschneider, D. E., 1984. “ Screening conifers for resistance to Gremmeniella abietina ”. In Scleroderris Canker of Conifers, Edited by:Manion, P. D., 189–196. The Hague, Netherlands:Martinus Nijhoff/Dr W. Junk Publishers. ISBN 90–247–2912–2.
49. Söderström, V., 1976. Analysis of the effect of scarification before planting conifers on some newly clearfelled areas in Sweden. Sveriges Skogsv. Förb. Tidskr., 74:59–333. (In Swedish with English summary.)
50. Söderström, V., 1981. “ Site preparation ”. In Forest Regeneration at High Altitudes:Experiences from Northern Sweden, General Technical Report Edited by:Murray, M., 17–20. Portland, Oregon:US Forest Service, Dept. Agric. PNW-132
51. Wood, J. E., 1990. Black spruce and jack pine plantation performance in boreal Ontario:10-year results. North. J. Appl. For., 7:175–179.