Budget-constraint, temporal, and question-ordering effects in contingent valuation studies

Environment and Planning A

Volumn 29, Issue 7, 1997, Pages 1215-1228

  Bateman, I J ^a   Langford, I H ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUDGET CONSTRAINTS; CONTINGENT VALUATION; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; METHODOLOGICAL EVALUATION; WILLINGNESS TO PAY; WOODLAND RECREATION;

EID: 0031467901     PISSN: 0308518X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1068/a291215     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Arrow K J, 1982, "Risk perception in psychology and economics" Economic Inquiry 20 1-9
2. Arrow K J, Solow R, Portney P R, Learner E E, Radner R, Schuman E H, 1993, "Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation" Federal Register 58 4602-4614
3. Bateman I J, Langford I H, 1995, "Design effects in contingent valuation studies", WP-95-02, Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment, University of East Anglia, Norwich, and University College, London
4. Bateman I J, Brainard J S, Lovett A A, 1995a, "Modelling woodland recreation demand using geographical information systems: a benefit transfer study", WP-95-06, Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment, University of East Anglia, Norwich, and University College, London
5. Bateman I J, Langford I H, Graham A W K, 1995b, "A survey of non-users willingness to pay to prevent saline flooding in the Norfolk Broads", WP-95-11, Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment, University of East Anglia, Norwich, and University College, London
6. Bateman I J, Langford I H, Turner R K, Willis K G, Garrod G D, 1995c, "Elicitation and truncation effects in contingent valuation studies" Ecological Economics 12 161-179
7. Bishop K D, 1992, "Assessing the benefits of community forests: an evaluation of the recreational use benefits of two urban fringe woodlands" Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 35(1) 63-76
8. Boyle K J, Bishop R C, Welsh M P, 1985, "Starting point bias in contingent valuation bidding games" Land Economics 61 188-194
9. Boyle K J, Reiling S D, Phillips M L, 1990, "Species substitution and question sequencing in contingent-valuation surveys evaluating the hunting of several species of wildlife" Leisure Science 12 103-118
10. Boyle K J, Welsh M P, Bishop R C, 1993, "The role of question order and respondent experience in contingent-valuation studies" Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 25 S80-S99
11. Brennan G, Buchanan J M, 1984. "Voter choice" American Behavioural Scientist 28 185-201
12. Brookshire D S, d'Arge R C, Schulze W D, Thayer M A, 1981, "Experiments in valuing public goods", in Advances in Applied Microeconomics: Volume 1 Ed. V K Smith (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) pp 123-172
13. Burness H S, Cummings R G, Mehr A F, Walbert M S, 1983, "Valuing policies which reduce environmental risk" Natural Resources Journal 23 675-682
14. Carson R T, Mitchell R C, 1993, "The value of clean water: the public's willingness to pay for boatable, fishable and swimmable quality water" Water Resources Research 29 2445-2454
15. Carson R T, Mitchell R C, 1995, "Sequencing and nesting in contingent valuation surveys" Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 28 155-173
16. Carson R T, Flores N E, Hanemann W M, 1992, "On the creation and destruction of public goods: the matter of sequencing", paper presented at the Third Annual Conference of the European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, Cracow, Poland; copy available from R T Carson. Department of Economics, University of California, San Diego, CA 92093-0508, USA
17. Carson R T, Hanemann W M, Kopp R J, Krosnick J A, Mitchell R C, Presser S, Ruud P A, Smith V K. 1995, "Temporal reliability of estimates from contingent valuation", DP-95-37, Resources for the Future. Washington, DC
18. Cummings R G, Brookshire D S, Schulze W D, 1986 Valuing Environmental Goods. An Assessment of the Contingent-valuation Method (Rowman and Littlefield, Savage, MD)
19. Deaton A, Muellbauer J, 1980 Economics and Consumer Behaviour (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
20. Desvousges W H, Johnson F R, Dunford R W, Boyle K J, Hudson S P, Wilson K N, 1993, "Measuring natural resource damages with contingent valuation: tests of validity and reliability", in Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment Ed. J A Hausman (North-Holland, Amsterdam) pp 91-164
21. Diamond P A, Hausman J A, Leonard G K, Denning M A, 1993, "Does contingent valuation measure preferences?: experimental evidence", in Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment Ed. J A Hausman (North-Holland, Amsterdam) pp 41-90
22. Efron B, Tibshirani R J, 1993 An Introduction to the Bootstrap (Chapman and Hall, New York)
23. Kahneman D, Knetsch J L, 1992, "Valuing public goods: the purchase of moral satisfaction" Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 22 57-70
24. Kahneman D, Tversky A, 1984, "Choices, values and frames" American Psychologist 39 341-350
25. Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A (Eds), 1982 Judgement Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (Cambridge University Press, New York)
26. Langford I H, 1994, "Using a generalized linear mixed model to analyze dichotomous choice contingent valuation data" Land Economics 70 507-514
27. Loomis J B, Gonzalez-Caban A, Gregory R, 1994, "Do reminders of substitutes and budget constraints influence contingent valuation estimates?" Land Economics 70 499-506
28. Mitchell R C, Carson R T, 1989 Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method (Resources for the Future, Washington, DC)
29. Randall A, Hoehn J P, 1992, "Embedding effects in contingent valuation: implications for natural resource damage assessment", staff paper 92-14. Department of Agricultural Economics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI
30. Randall A, Hoehn J P, 1996, "Embedding in market demand systems" Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 30 369-380
31. Schkade D A, Payne P W, 1994, "How people respond to contingent valuation questions" Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 26 88-109
32. Schulze W D, Cummings R G, Brookshire D S, Thayer M H, Whitworth R L, Rahmatian M, 1983, "Experimental approaches to valuing environmental commodities: volume II", draft final report for Methods Development in measuring Benefits of Environmental Improvements, US Environmental Protection Agency grant CR808-893-01; copy available from US EPA, Washington, DC
33. Smith V K, 1992, "Arbitrary values, good causes and premature verdicts" Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 22 71-89
34. Sugden R, 1997, "Public goods and contingent valuation", in Contingent Valuation of Environmental Preferences: Assessing Theory and Practice in the US, EU and Developing Countries Eds I J Bateman, K G Willis (Oxford University Press, Oxford) forthcoming
35. Tversky A, Sattath S, Slovic P, 1988, "Contingent weighting in judgement and choice" Psychological Review 95 371-384
36. Willis K G, Garrod G D, 1993, "Valuing landscape: a contingent valuation approach" Journal of Environmental Management 37 1-22