Introduction to Single System Designs for Neurorehabilitation Research

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 199-206

  Ottenbacher, Kenneth J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BRANCH   (United States)

Author keywords

Clinical evaluation; Research; Single subject

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL RESEARCH; DATA ANALYSIS; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; REHABILITATION MEDICINE; REVIEW; SYSTEM ANALYSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0031467290     PISSN: 15459683     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/154596839701100401     Document Type: Editorial

References (14)

1. Barlow DH, Hayes SC, Nelson RO The scientist practitioner: research and accountability in clinical and educational settings. New York: Pergamon Press, 1984.
2. Barlow. DH, Hersen M. Single-case experimental designs: strategies for studying behavior change. 2nd ed. New York: Pergamon Press, 1984.
3. Kazdin AK Single-case research design. methods for clinical and applied settings. New York: Oxford University Press, 1982.
4. Bloom M., Fischer J., Orme JG Evaluating practice guidelines for the accountable professional. 2nd ed. Boston: Allyn, and Bacon, 1995.
5. Ottenbacher KJ Evaluating clinical change: strategies for occupational and physical therapists. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1986.
6. Harbst K., Otteribacher KJ, Harris SR Visual analysis of single-subject data: Influence of celeration line on inter-rater reliability. Phys Ther 1991; 71: 107-115.
7. Huitema BE Statistical analysis and single-subject designs: Some misunderstandings. In: Poling A, Fuqua RW (eds.). Research methods in applied behavior analysis. New York: Plenum Press, 1986: 209-232.
8. Gonnella C. Single-subject experimental paradigm as a clinical decision tool. Phys Ther 1989; 69: 601-609.
9. Guyatt G., Heyting A., Jaeschke R., Keller J., Adachi JD, Roberts RS N of randomized trials for investigating new drugs. Cont Clinic Trial 1990; 11: 88-100.
10. Wolery M., Harris SR Interpreting results of single-subject research designs. Phys Ther 1982; 62: 445-452.
11. Guyatt G., Sackett D., Taylor W., Chong J., Roberts R., Pugsley S. Determining optimal therapy: randomized trials of individual patients. N EnglJ Med 1986; 314: 889-892.
12. Carey LM, Matyas TA, Oke LE Sensory loss in stroke patients: effective training of tactile and proprioceptive discrimination. Arch Pitys Med Rehabil 1993; 74: 602-611.
13. Edmans JA, Lincoln NB Treatment of visual perceptual deficits after stroke: four single case studies. Inter Disabil Stud 1989; 11: 25-33.
14. Whyte J., DiPasquale MC Assessment of vision and visual attention in minimally responsive brain injured patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995; 76: 804-810.