The quality of environmental impact statements: A review of those submitted in Cork, Eire from 1988–1993

Project Appraisal

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 43-52

  McGrath, Clodagh ^a   Bond, Alan ^b  

^a University of Wales Aberystwyth ^*  (United Kingdom)

^b ABERYSTWYTH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Environmental impact; Ireland; Project appraisal Clodagh McGrath is at the Building Research Establishment

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT; PLANNING PROJECT; PROJECT APPRAISAL;

IRELAND, COUNTY CORK, CORK;

EID: 0031465297     PISSN: 02688867     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02688867.1997.9727037     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Anon. 1996. “Quality of environmental statements held back by poor ‘scoping’”. ENDS Report, 256:7–8.
2. Brangan, E. 1991. Inventory of EISs submitted between July 1988 and December 1990 Environmental Resources Unit.
3. Brangan, E. 1992. Inventory of EISs submitted during 1991 Environmental Resources Unit.
4. Brangan, E. 1993. Inventory of EISs submitted during 1992 Environmental Resources Unit.
5. Commission of the European Communities. 1993. Report from the Commission on the Implementation of Directive 85/337/EEC on the Assessment of the Effects of Certain Public and Private Projects on the Environment COM 93 28 final, vol 12.
6. Dancey, R, and Lee, N. 1993. The Quality of Environmental Impact Assessments Submitted in Ireland Dublin:Environmental Research Unit. (,Ireland in association with the EIA Centre, University of Manchester
7. DOE, Department of the Environment Planning Research Programme. 1996. Changes in the Quality of Environmental Statements for Planning Projects HMSO.
8. Elkin, T J, and Smith, P GR. 1988. “What is a good environmental impact statement? reviewing screening reports from Canada's National Parks”. Journal of Environmental Management, 26:71–89.
9. EPA, Environmental Protection Agency. 1995a. Draft Guidelines on the Information to be Contained in Environmental Impact Statements Wexford, Ireland:Environmental Protection Agency.
10. EPA, Environmental Protection Agency. 1995b. Advice Notes on Current Practice in the Preparation of Environmental Impact Statements Wexford, Ireland:Environmental Protection Agency.
11. Fuller, K. 1994. “Reviewing ESs:digging below the surface”. In paper presented at conference on assessing ES, Aston University, 18 October 1994.
12. Jones, C E. 1994. “ESs—number, quality and the EA process”. In paper presented at conference on assessing EA, Aston University, 18 October 1994.
13. Lee, N, and Brown, D. 1992. “Quality control in EA”. Project Appraisal, 7 (1):41–45.
14. Lee, N, and Colley, R. 1992. “Reviewing the quality of environmental statements”, Occasional paper no 24 (second edition), EIA Centre, University of Manchester.
15. McMahon, N. 1996. “Quality of environmental statements submitted in Northern Ireland in relation to the disposal of waste on land”. Project Appraisal, 11 (2):85–94.
16. Meldon, J. 1993. EIA in Ireland Taisce.
17. O'Shea, A. 1994. The Quality of EIA:a Review of those Submitted in Ireland in 1992 unpublished MSc thesis, University College Dublin.
18. Ross, W A. 1987. “Evaluating EISs”. Journal of Environmental Management, 25:137–147.
19. Simpson, B. 1994. “The need for EA”. In paper presented at conference on assessing ES, Aston University, 18 October 1994.