Comparative stem anatomy and systematics of Eriosyce sensu lato (Cactaceae)

Annals of Botany

Volumn 80, Issue 6, 1997, Pages 767-786

  Nyffeler, Reto ^a,c   Eggli, Urs ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b Sukkulenten Sammlung Zürich Grün Stadt Zürich   (Switzerland)

^c HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Anatomy; Argentina; Cactaceae; Cacti; Chile; Cladistics; Classification; Cortex; Epidermis; Eriosyce; Hyp odermis; Mucilage

Indexed keywords

ERIOSYCE SENSU;

EID: 0031450011     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/anbo.1997.0518     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Backeberg C. 1959. Die Cactaceae. Vol. 3. Jena: VEB Gustav Fischer Verlag.
2. Barthlott W, Hunt DR. 1993. Cactaceae. In: Kubitzki K, ed. The families and genera of vascular plants. Vol. 2. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 161-197.
3. Boke NH. 1980. Developmental morphology and anatomy in Cactaceae. BioScience 30: 605-610.
4. Buxbaum F. 1975. Provisorische Neugliederung der Tribus Notocacteae. In: Krainz H, ed., Die Kakteen, Liefg. 60, CVI.
5. Condé LF. 1975. Anatomical comparisons of five species of Opuntia (Cactaceae). Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 62: 425-473.
6. Davis JI. 1993. Character removal as a means for assessing stability of clades. Cladistics 9: 201-210.
7. Donald JD, Rowley GD. 1966. Reunion of the genus Neoporteria. Cactus and Succulent Journal of Great Britain 28: 54-58, 74-77.
8. Farris JS, 1969. A successive approximations approach to character weighting. Systematic Zoology 18: 374-385.
9. Farris JS. 1988. Hennig 86. Software and handbook. Distributed by the author.
10. Gibson AC, Horak KE. 1978. Systematic anatomy and phylogeny of Mexican columnar cacti. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 65: 999-1057.
11. Gibson AC, Nobel PS. 1986. The cactus primer. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
12. Gregory M, Baas P. 1989. A survey of mucilage cells in vegetative organs of Dicotyledons. Israel Journal of Botany 38: 125-174.
13. Hauser DL, Presch, W. 1991. The effect of ordered characters on phylogenetic reconstruction. Cladistics 7: 243-265.
14. Hunt DR, Taylor NP, eds. 1990. The genera of Cactaceae: progress towards consensus. Bradleya 8: 85-107.
15. Igersheim A. 1993. The character states of the Caribbean monotypic endemic Strumpfia (Rubiaceae). Nordic Journal of Botany 13: 545-559.
16. Igersheim A, Cichocki O. 1996. A simple method for microtome sectioning of prehistoric charcoal specimens, embedded in 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA). Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 92: 389-393.
17. Kattermann F. 1994. Eriosyce (Cactaceae). The genus revised and amplified. Succulent Plant Research 1: 1-176.
18. Lauterbach C. 1889. Untersuchungen über Bau und Entwicklung der Sekretbehälter bei den Cacteen. Botanisches Centralblatt 37: 257-264, 289-297, 329-336, 369-375. 409-413.
19. Lüthy JM. 1995. Taxonomische Untersuchung der Gattung Mammillaria Haw. (Cactaceae). Frankenthal: Arbeitskreis für Mammillarienfreunde.
20. Maddison DR. 1991. The discovery and importance of multiple islands of most-parsimonious trees. Systematic Zoology 40: 315-328.
21. Mauseth JD. 1996. Comparative anatomy of tribes Cereeae and Browningieae (Cactaceae). Bradleya 14: 66-81.
22. Nommensen R. 1910. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Anatomie der Kakteen, insbesondere ihres Hautgewebes. PhD Thesis, Kiel.
23. Nixon KC, Davis JI. 1991. Polymorphic taxa, missing value and cladistic analysis. Cladistics 7: 233-241.
24. Platnick NI, Griswold CE, Coddington JA. 1991. On missing entries in cladistic analysis. Cladistics 7: 337-343.
25. Ritter F. 1980. Kakteen in Südamerika. Vol. 3: Chile. Spangenberg (D): published by the author.
26. Schill R, Barthlott W, Ehler N, Rauh W. 1973. Raster-Elektronen-Mikroskopische Untersuchungen and Cactaceen-Epidermen. Tropische und Subtropische Pflanzenwelt 4: 1-14.
27. Schleiden MJ. 1845. Beiträge zur Anatomie der Cacteen. Mémoires de l'Académie Impéeriale des Sciences de St.-Péterbourg 4: 335-380, 10 pl.
28. Stevens PF. 1991. Character states, morphological variation, and phylogenetic analysis: a review. Systematic Botany 16: 553-583.
29. Stevens PF. 1996. On phylogenies and data bases - where are the data, or are there any? Taxon 45: 95-98.
30. Swofford DL, Olsen GJ, Waddell PJ, Hillis DM. 1996. Phylogenetic inference. In: Hillis DM, Moritz C, Mable BK, eds. Molecular systematics. 2nd edn. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates, 407-514.
31. Wilkinson, M. 1992. Ordered versus unordered characters. Cladistics 8: 375-385.