Evaluation of methyl anthranilate as a woodpecker repellent

International Journal of Pest Management

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 59-62

  Belant, J L ^a   Seamans, T W ^a   Dolbeer, R A ^a   Woronecki, P P ^a,b  

^a U S DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Chemical control; Damage; Feeding; Methyl anthranilate; Repellent; Woodpecker

Indexed keywords

DOWNY WOODPECKER; METHYL ANTHRANILATE; TP-40;

PICOIDES PUBESCENS;

EID: 0031446902     PISSN: 09670874     EISSN: 13665863     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/096708797228997     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. BELANT, J.L., GABREY, S.W., DOLBEER, R.A. and SEAMANS, T.W., 1995. Methyl anthranilate repels mallards and gulls from water. Crop Protection, 14, 171-175.
2. BELANT, J.L., SEAMANS, T.W., TYSON, LA, and ICKES, S.K., 1996. Repellency of methyl anthranilate to pre-exposed and naive Canada geese. Journal of Wildlife Management 60, 923-928.
3. CLARK, L., 1996. Trigeminal repellents do not promote conditioned odor avoidance in Eiropean starlings. Wilson Bulletin, 108, 36-52.
4. CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS, 1988. Food and Drugs, Vol. 21, Part 182. 60, p.391.
5. CRAVEN, S.R. 1984. Woodpeckers: a serious suburban problem? Proceedings Vertebrate Pest Conference, 11, 204-210.
6. CUMMNGS, J.L., POCHOP, PA, DAVIS, J.E., Jr., and KRUPA H.W., 1995. Evaluation of ReJex-iT AG-36 as a Canada goose grazing repellent. Journal of Wildlife Management, 59, 47-50.
7. DEMSJIS, J.V. 1964. Woodpecker damage to utility poles: with special reference to the role of territory and resonance. Bird-Banding 35, 225-253.
8. DOLBEER, R.A, CLARK, L., WOROISECKI, P.P. and SEAMANS, T.W. 1991. Pen tests of rrethyl anthranilate as a bird repellent in water. Proceedings Eastern Wildlife Damage Control Conference, 5, 112-116.
9. DOLBEER, R.A., BELANT, J.L. and CLARK, L. 1993. IVfethyl anthranilate formulations to repel birds from water at airports and food at landfills. Proceedings Great Plains Wildlife Damage Control Conference, 11, 42-53.
10. EVANS, D., BYFORD, J.L. and WAINBERG, R.H. (1983). A characterization of woodpecker damage to houses in east Tennessee. Proceedings Eastern Wildlife Damage Control Conference, 1, 325-329.
11. JEINNER, P.M, HAGEN, E C., TAYLOR, J.M, COOK, E.L. and FITZHUGH, O.G. 1964. Food flavourings and compounds of related structures. I. Acute oral toxicity. Food Cosmetics and Toxicology, 2, 327-343.
12. MARSH, R.E. 1983. Woodpeckers. In R.M. Tirrm(ed) Prevention and Control of Wildlife Damage (Lincoln: University of Nebraska), pp. E79-84.
13. MASON, J.R., ADAMS, MA. and CLARK, L., 1989. Anthranilate repellency to starlings: chemical correlates and sensory perception: Joirnal of Wildlife Management 53, 55-64.
14. MASON, J.R. and CLARK, L. 1992. Nonlethal repellents: the development of cost-effective practical solutions to agricultural and industrial problems. Proceedings Vertebrate Pest Conference, 15, 115-129.
15. PACKHAM C.J. and COMMOLLY, G. 1992. Control methods research priorities for Animal Damage Control. Proceedings Vertebrate Pest Conference, 15, 12-16.
16. PFITZENMEYER, H.T. 1956. Life history and behavior patterns of the pileated woodpecker relative to utility lines. M.S. thesis, (State College: Pennsylvania State University), pp. 112.
17. RUMSEY, R.L. 1970. Woodpecker nest failure in creosoted utility poles. Auk, 87, 367-369.
18. SAS INSTITUTE INC. 1988. SAS/STAT Usérs Guide, 6.03 edition (Cary, North Carolina: SAS Institute Inc.), pp. 1028.
19. STEMVERMAN, LA. 1988. Observation of woodpecker damage to electrical distribution line poles in Missouri. Proceedings Vertebrate Pest Conference, 13, 260-265.