Time-frequency distribution of evoked otoacoustic emissions

British Journal of Audiology

Volumn 31, Issue 6, 1997, Pages 461-471

  Özdamar, Özcan ^a   Zhang, Jianwei ^a   Kalayci, Tulga ^b   Ülgen, Yekta ^c  

^a University of Miami   (United States)

^b EGE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^c BOGAZICI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; EVOKED OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; FOURIER TRANSFORMATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPECTROSCOPY;

EID: 0031443470     PISSN: 03005364     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/03005364000000040     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Anderson SD. Some ECMR properties in relation to other signals from the auditory periphery. Hear Res 1980; 2:273-96.
2. Choi HI, Williams WJ. Improved time-frequency representation of multi-component signals using exponential kernels. IEEE Trans Acoust Speech, Signal Proc 1989; 37:862-71.
3. Cohen L. Time-frequency distributions - A review. Proc IEEE 1989; 77:941-81.
4. Hlawatsch F, Boudreaux-Bartels GF. Linear and quadratic time-frequency signal representations. IEEE SP Mag 1992; April: 21-67.
5. Kollmeier B, Uppenhamp S. Analysis and influence of lidocaine on evoked otoacoustic emissions from tinnitus sufferers. In: Wilson JP, Kemp DT, eds. Cochlear Mechanisms, Structure, Function and Models. London: Plenum Press 1989; 331-39.
6. Silverman HF, Lee YT. On the spectrographic representation of rapidly time-varying speech. Comp Speech Language 1987; 2: 63-86.
7. Watkins WA. The harmonic level: Fact or artefact in spectral analysis of pulse trains. Marine Bio-acoustics 1966; 2: 15-43.
8. Wit HP, Dijk PV, Avan P. Wavelet analysis of real ear and synthesised click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res 1994; 73: 141-47.