On matching compliance between canine carotid arteries and polyurethane grafts

Artificial Organs

Volumn 21, Issue 12, 1997, Pages 1247-1254

  Hsu, Shan Hui ^a   Kambic, Helen ^b  

^a NATIONAL CHUNG HSING UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Compliance; Design; Polyurethane; Vascular graft modulus; Viscoelasticity

Indexed keywords

GRAFTING (CHEMICAL); GRAFTS;

CAROTID ARTERY; COMPLIANCE; CONTRIBUTING FACTOR; DYNAMIC COMPLIANCE; GRAFT FAILURE; IN-VITRO; MATCHINGS; VASCULAR GRAFT MODULUS; VASCULAR GRAFTS; VITRO AND IN VIVO;

POLYURETHANES;

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTERIAL PRESSURE; ARTERY COMPLIANCE; ARTERY GRAFT; ARTICLE; BLOOD VESSEL DIAMETER; CAROTID ARTERY; DOG; NONHUMAN; POLITEF IMPLANT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STRESS STRAIN RELATIONSHIP; TENSILE STRENGTH; VISCOELASTICITY;

ANIMALIA; CANIS FAMILIARIS;

EID: 0031442795     PISSN: 0160564X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.1997.tb00485.x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Abbott WM, Cambria RP. Control of physical characteristics (elasticity and compliance) of vascular grafts. In: Stanley JC, Burkel WE, Lindenauer SM, Barlett RH, Turcotte G, eds. Biologic and synthetic vascular prostheses. New York: Grune and Stratton, 1982:189-220.
2. Clark RE, Apostolou S, Kardos JL. Mismatch of mechanical properties as a cause of arterial prosthesis thrombosis. Surg Forum 1976;27:208-10.
3. Abbott WM, Mergerman J, Hasson JE, L'Italien G, Warnock DF. Effect of compliance mismatch on vascular graft patency. J Vasc Surg 1987;5:376-82.
4. Rhee K, Tarbell JM. A study of the wall shear rate distribution near the end-to-end anastomosis of a rigid graft and a compliant artery. J Biomech 1994;27:329-38.
5. Womersley JR. Oscillatory flow in arteries. II: The reflection of the pulse wave at junctions and rigid inserts in the arterial system. Phys Med Biol 1948;2:313-23.
6. Wu MH-D, Shi Q, Sauvage LR, Kaplan S, Hayashida N, Patel MD, Wechezak AR, Walker MW. The direct effect of graft compliance mismatch per se on development of host arterial intimal hyperplasia at the anastomotic interface. Ann Vasc Surg 1993;7:156-68.
7. Truvel W, Schima H, Moritz A, Raderer F, Windisch A, Ullrich R, Windberger U, Losert U, Polterauer P. Compliance mismatch and formation of distal anastomotic intimal hyperplasis in externally stiffened and lumen-adapted venous grafts. J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1995;10:415-23.
8. Hofstra L, Bergmans DC, Leunissen KM, Hoeks AP, Kitslaar PJ, Daemen MJ, Tordoir JH. Anastomotic intimal hyperplasia in prosthetic arteriovenous fistulas for hemodialkysis is associated with initial high flow velocity and not with mismatch in elastic properties. J Am Soc Nephrology 1995;6: 1625-33.
9. Caddock BD, Evans KE. Negative Poisson ratios and strain-dependent mechanical properties in arterial prostheses. Biomaterials 1995;16:1109-15.
10. Tu R, Wang E, Hatga C, Shen SH, Lin D, Quijano RC. A compliant biological vascular prosthesis. Int J Artif Organs 1993;16:141-5.
11. Fung YC. Biomechanics - Mechanical properties of living tissues. New York: Springer Verlag, 1981:276.
12. Vaishnav RN, Young JT, Patel DJ. Distribution of stresses and of strain-energy density through the wall thickness in a canine aortic segment. Circ Res 1973;32:577-83.
13. Wesley RLR, Vaishnav RN, Fuchs JCA, Patel DJ, Greenfield JC. Static linear and nonlinear elastic properties of normal and arterialized venous tissue in dog and man. Circ Res 1975; 37:509-20.
14. Lawton RW. The thermoelastic behaviour of isolated aortic strips of the dog. Circ Res 1954;2:344-53.
15. Uchida N, Kambic H, Emoto H, Chen J, Hsu S, Murabayashi S, Harasaki H, Nosé Y. Compliance effects on small diameter polyurethane graft patency. J Biomed Mater Res 1993;27: 1269-79.
16. Kambic H, Murabayashi S, Yozu R, Morimoto T, Furuse M, Harasaki H, George C, Helmus M, Snyder R, Nosé Y. Small vessel replacement with elastomeric protein composite materials: Preliminary studies. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 1984;30:406-10.
17. Hokanson DE, Mazersky D, Sumner DS, Strandness DE. A phase-locked echo tracking system for recording arterial diameter changes in vivo. J Appl Physiol 1972;32:728-33.
18. Massiello A, Kiraly R, Butler K, Himley S, Chen J-F, McCarthy PM. The Cleveland Clinic-Nimbus total artificial heart: Design and in vitro function. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994; 108:412-9.
19. Fenn WO. Changes in length of blood vessels on inflation. In: Remington JR, ed. Tissue elasticity, Washington, D.C.: American Physiological Society, 1957.
20. Bergel DH. The static elastic properties of the arterial wall. J Physiol 1961;156:445-57.
21. Bergel DH. The dynamic elastic properties of the arterial wall. J Physiol 1961;156:458-69.
22. Papageorgiou GL, Jones NB. Circumferential and longitudinal viscoelasticity of human iliac arterial segments in vitro. J Biomed Eng 1988;10:82-90.
23. Lawton RW. Variability of the viscoelastic constants along the aortic axis of the dog. Circ Res 1960;8:381-9.
24. Klein SR, Goldberg L, Miranda RM, Bosco P, Nelson RJ, White RA. Effect of suture technique on arterial anastomotic compliance. Arch Surg 1982;117:45-7.
25. Hasson J, Megerman J, Abbott WM. Suture technique and para-anastomotic compliance. J Vasc Surg 1986;3:591-8.
26. Chandran KB, Gao D, Han G, Baraniewski, Corson JD. Finite element analysis of arterial anastomosis with vein, Dacron and PTFE grafts. Med Biol Engin Comp 1991;30(4): 413-8.