Impact of adjustments for intermediate phenotypes on the power to detect linkage

Genetic Epidemiology

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 1997, Pages 749-754

  Arnett, Donna K ^a   Pankow, James S ^a   Atwood, Larry D ^a   Sellers, Thomas A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Sib pair analysis; Simulation

Indexed keywords

CONFERENCE PAPER; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; PHENOTYPE; SIMULATION;

CHROMOSOME MAPPING; FEMALE; GENETIC DISEASES, INBORN; HUMANS; LINKAGE (GENETICS); MALE; MATCHED-PAIR ANALYSIS; NUCLEAR FAMILY; PHENOTYPE; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT, HERITABLE; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 0031441658     PISSN: 07410395     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2272(1997)14:6<749::AID-GEPI31>3.0.CO;2-O     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (9)

1. Clerget-Darpoux F, Bonaiti-Pellie C, Hochez J (1986): Effects of misspecifying genetic parameters in lod score analysis. Biometrics 42:393-399.
2. Curtis D (1996): Genetic dissection of complex traits. Nat Genet 12:356-357.
3. Haseman J, Elston R (1992): The investigation of linkage between a quantitative trait and a marker locus. Behav Genet 2:3-19.
4. Lander E, Kruglyak L (1995): Genetic dissection of complex traits: guidelines for interpreting and reporting linkage results. Nat Genet 11:241-247.
5. Lander ES, Schork NJ (1994): Genetic dissection of complex traits. Science 265:2037-2048.
6. S.A.G.E. (1994): Statistical Analysis for Genetic Epidemiology, Release 2.2: Computer program available from the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland.
7. SAS Institute Inc. (1989): SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 6, Fourth Edition, Volume 2, Cary NC: SAS Institute Inc.
8. Weeks DE, Lathrop GM (1995): Polygenic disease: methods for mapping complex disease traits. Trends in Genetics 11:513-519.
9. Witte JS, Elston RC, Schork NJ (1996): Genetic dissection of complex traits. Nat Genet 12:355-356.