Correlation between salpingoscopic score and subsequent pregnancy outcome in patients with tubal infertility

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics

Volumn 14, Issue 10, 1997, Pages 562-565

  Sawada, Tomio ^a,b   Tsukada, Kazuhiko ^a   Satoh, Masaaki ^a   Kawakami, Seiji ^a  

^a FUJITA HEALTH UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b NONE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Endometriosis; Fallopian tube; Inflammation; Laparoscopy; Salpingoscopy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONFERENCE PAPER; ENDOMETRIOSIS; FALLOPOSCOPY; FEMALE; FEMALE INFERTILITY; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HYDROSALPINX; PREDICTION; PREGNANCY COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGICAL APPROACH; TREATMENT PLANNING; UTERINE TUBE OCCLUSION; UTERINE TUBE SURGERY;

ENDOSCOPY; FALLOPIAN TUBE DISEASES; FALLOPIAN TUBE PATENCY TESTS; FALLOPIAN TUBES; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMANS; INFERTILITY, FEMALE; MICROSURGERY; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME;

FALLOPIA; HYDROSALPINX;

EID: 0031440105     PISSN: 10580468     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1022572432753     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Westrom L: Incidence, prevalence and trends of acute pelvic inflammatory disease and its consequences in industrialized countries. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1980;138:880-892
2. American Fertility Society: The American Fertility Society classifications on adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, Mullerian anomalies, and intrauterine adhesions. Fertil Steril 1988;49:944-955
3. Kerin J, Williams D, San Roman G, Pearlstone A, Grundfest W, Surrey E: Falloposcopic classification and treatment of fallopian tube disease. Fertil Steril 1992;57:731-741
4. Mage G, Pouly J-L, de Joliniere JB, Chabrand S, Riouallon A, Bruhat MA: A preoperative classification to predict the intrauterine and ectopic pregnancy rates after distal tubal micro-surgery. Fertil Steril 1986;46:807-810
5. Hulka JF: Adnexal adhesions. A prognostic staging and classification system based on a five-year survey of fertility surgery results at Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982;144:141-148
6. Surrey ES, Surrey MW: Correlation between salpingoscopic and laparoscopic staging in the assessment of the distal fallopian tube. Fertil Steril 1996;65:267-271
7. Bowman MC, Cooke ID: Comparison of fallopian tube intraluminal pathology as assessed by salpingoscopy with pelvic adhesions. Fertil Steril 1994;61:464-469
8. Dubuisson J, Chapron C, Morice P, Aubriot F, Foulot H, de Joliniere J: Laparoscopic salpingostomy. Fertility results according to the tubal mucosal appearance. Hum Reprod 1994;9:334-339
9. Scudamore I, Dunphy B, Bowman M, Jenkins J, Cooke I: Comparison of ampullay assessment by falloposcopy and salpingoscopy. Hum Reprod 1994;9:1516-1518
10. Herschlag A, Seifer D, Carcangiu M, Patton D, Diamond M, DeChemey A: Salpingoscopy. Light microscopic and electron microscopic correlations. Obstet Gynecol 1991;77:399-405
11. Kawakami S: Disorder of ciliated cells in endosalpinx and fertility. J Clin Electron Microsc 1987;20:5-8
12. Marana R, Catalano GF, Rizz M, Camana P, Muzu L, Mancuso S: Correlation between the American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesion and distal tubal occlusion, salpingoscopy, and reproductive outcome in tubal surgery. Fertil Steril 1995;64:924-929
13. Gomel V, Taylor PJ: In vitro fertilization versus reconstructive tubal surgery. J Assist Reprod Genet 1992;9:306-309