Two character states new for hylines and the taxonomy of the genus Pseudacris

Journal of Herpetology

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 609-613

  Da Silva, Hélio Ricardo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PSEUDACRIS;

EID: 0031438834     PISSN: 00221511     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/1565624     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. ANDERSON, K. 1991. Chromosome evolution in Holarctic Hyla tree frogs. In D. M. Green and S. K. Sessions (eds.), Amphibian Cytogenetics and Evolution, pp. 299-331. Academic Press, San Diego.
2. CHANTELL, C. J. 1968a. The osteology of Acris and Limnaoedus (Amphibia: Hylidae). Amer. Midl. Natur. 79:169-182.
3. _. 1968b. The osteology of Pseudacris (Amphibia: Hylidae). Amer. Midl. Natur. 80:381-391.
4. COCROFT, R. B. 1994. A cladistic analysis of chorus frog phylogeny (Hylidae: Pseudacris). Herpetologica 50:420-437.
5. _, AND M. J. RYAN. 1995. Patterns of advertisement call evolution in toads and chorus frogs. Anim. Behav. 49:283-305.
6. DELAHOUSSAYE, A. J. 1966. The comparative sperm morphology of the Louisiana Hylidae (Amphibia: Anura). Proc. Louisiana Acad. Sci. 29:140-152.
7. DUBOIS, A. 1992. Les notions de genre, sous-genre et groupe d'espèces en zoologie à la lumière de la systématique évolutive. Monitore Zool. Ital. (N. S.) 16:9-65.
8. DUELLMAN, W. E. 1970. Hylid Frogs of Middle America, vol. 1-2. Museum of Natural History, Univ. Kansas. Lawrence.
9. GAUDIN, A. J. 1969. A comparative study of the osteology and evolution of the Holartictic tree frogs: Hyla, Pseudacris, Acris, and Limnaoedus. Unpubl. Ph.D. Diss. Univ. Southern California, Los Angeles.
10. _. 1973. Species group of North American Chorus frogs (Genus Pseudacris: Family Hylidae). Bull. South. California Acad. Sci. 72:49-50.
11. _. 1974. An osteological analysis of the Holarctic tree frog family Hylidae. J. Herpetol. 8:114-152.
12. HEDGES, S. B. 1986. An electrophoretic analysis of Holarctic hylid frog evolution. Syst. Zool. 35:1-21.
13. KLUGE, A. G. 1989. A concern for evidence and a phylogenetic hypothesis of relationships among Epicrates (Boidae, Serpentes). Syst. Zool. 38:7-25.
14. MADDISON, W. P., AND D. R. MADDISON. 1992. MacClade: Analysis of Phylogeny and Character Evolution. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
15. MAXSON, L. R., AND A. C. WILSON. 1975. Albumin evolution and organismal evolution in tree frogs (Hylidae). Syst. Zool. 24:1-15.
16. NOBLE, G. K. 1923. The generic and genetic relations of Pseudacris, the swamp tree frog. Am. Mus. Novit. 70:1-6.
17. PAUKSTIS, G. L., AND L. E. BROWN. 1987. Evolution of the intercalary cartilage in chorus frogs, genus Pseudacris (Salientia: Hylidae). Brimleyana 13:55-61.
18. SWOFFORD, D. L. 1993. PAUP: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony, Version 3.1.1 Computer program distributed by the Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, Illinois.
19. WALLACE, D. G., L. R. MAXON, AND A. C. WILSON. 1971. Albumin evolution in frogs: A test of the evolutionary clock hypothesis. Proc. Nac. Acad. Sci. (U.S.A.) 68:3127-3129.
20. WILEY, J. E. 1982. Chromosome banding patterns of three frogs (Hylidae) of the eastern USA. Herpetologica 38:507-520.