The defeat of Philip Morris' 'California uniform tobacco control Act'

American Journal of Public Health

Volumn 87, Issue 12, 1997, Pages 1989-1996

  Macdonald, Heather ^a   Aguinaga, Stella ^a   Glantz, Stanton A ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER PREVENTION; CIGARETTE SMOKING; INDUSTRY; LAW ENFORCEMENT; LUNG CANCER; SMOKING CESSATION; TOBACCO; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0031438529     PISSN: 00900036     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.87.12.1989     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Glantz S. Achieving a smokefree society. Circulation. 1987;76:746-752.
2. Samuels B, Glantz S. The politics of local tobacco control. JAMA. 1991;266:2110-2117.
3. Traynor MP, Begay ME, Glantz SA. New tobacco industry strategy to prevent local tobacco control. JAMA. 1993;270:479-486.
4. Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights, Western Consortium for Public Health. Preemption in Tobacco Control: History, Current Issues, and Future Concerns. Berkeley, Calif: California Wellness Foundation; 1995.
5. Samuels BE, Begay ME, Hazan AR, Glantz SA. Philip Morris's failed experiment in Pittsburgh. J Health Polit Policy Law. 1992;17:329-351.
6. Hanauer P. Proposition P: anatomy of a nonsmokers' rights ordinance. NY Stale J Mad. 1985;85:369-374.
7. Begay ME, Traynor M, Glantz SA. The Twilight of Proposition 99: Reauthorization of Tobacco Education Programs and Tobacco Industry Political Expenditures in 1993. San Francisco, Calif: Institute for Health Policy Studies; 1994.
8. Skolnick A. Cancer converts tobacco lobbyist: Victor L. Crawford goes on the record. JAMA. 1995;274:199-202.
9. Conlisk E, Siegel M, Lengerich E, Mac Kenzie W, Malek S, Eriksen M. The status of local smoking regulations in North Carolina following a state preemption bill. JAMA. 1995;273:805-807.
10. The Tax Burden on Tobacco. Washington, DC: Tobacco Institute; 1995:33.
11. Glantz SA. Changes in cigarette consumption, prices, and tobacco industry revenues associated with California's Proposition 99. Tobacco Control. 1993;2:311-314.
12. Glantz S. The ledger of tobacco control. JAMA. 1996:276:871-872. Letter.
13. Kerrigan MJ. A Proposed Comprehensive Tobacco Control Act in California/RIIPP 1. Washington, DC: Smokeless Tobacco Council Inc; 1991.
14. Lucas G. Panel defeats no-smoking bill linked to Brown. San Francisco Chronicle. August 30, 1991.
15. Glantz S, Begay M. Tobacco industry campaign contributions are affecting tobacco control policymaking in California. JAMA. 1994:272:1176-1182.
16. Webb G. Speaker disguised smoking bill, memo says. San Jose Mercury News. August 27, 1991:1A,4A
17. Lucas G. Health groups blast tobacco-industry bill. San Francisco Chronicle. August 27, 1991:A17
18. Richardson J, Kushman R. Advice to tobacco firms admitted. Sacramento Bee. August 30, 1991:A3
19. Walters D. Tobacco firms blowing smoke. Sacramento Bee. July 15, 1991.
20. Ayres D. Philip Morris on offensive in California. New York Times. May 16, 1994:A1.
21. Bell CG, Price CM. California Government Today: Politics of Reform. 4th ed. Pacific Grove, Calif: Brooks/Cole Publishing Co; 1992.
22. Friedrich B. California ballot propositions, 1944-present. Calif J. May 1996.
23. The California Uniform Tobacco Control Act. Californians for Statewide Smoking Restrictions; 1994.
24. Petition Response Express Pak. Californians for Statewide Smoking Restrictions; 1994.
25. ASHRAE Standard 62-1989: Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality. Atlanta, Ga: American Society of Heating, Refrigeration, and Air Conditioning Engineers; 1989.
26. Daynard R. What is ASHRAE and why we should care. Presented at 7th World Conference on Tobacco and Health, Perth. Australia, March 1990.
27. National Research Council Committee on Passive Smoking. Environmental Tobacco Smoke: Measuring Exposures and Assessing Health Effects. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1986.
28. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Smoking. A Report of the Surgeon General. Washington, DC: US Dept of Health and Human Services; 1986.
29. Macdonald HR, Glantz SA. Analysis of the Smoking and Tobacco Products, Statewide Regulation Initiative Statute. San Francisco, Calif: Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco; 1994.
30. Stillman F, Becker D, Swank R, et al. Ending smoking at the Johns Hopkins medical institutions: an evaluation of smoking prevalence and indoor air pollution. JAMA. 1990;264:1565-1569.
31. Woodruff T, Rosbrook B, Pierce J, Glantz S. Lower levels of cigarette consumption found in smoke-free workplaces in California. Arch Intern Med. 1993:1485-1493.
32. Pierce JP, Evans N, Farkas AJ, et al. Tobacco Use in California: An Evaluation of the Tobacco Control Program, 1989-1993. La Jolla, Calif: University of California, San Diego; 1994.
33. Patten CA, Gilpin E, Cavin S, Pierce JP. Workplace smoking policy and changes in smoking behavior in California: a suggested association. Tobacco Control. 1995;4:36-41.
34. Bal DG, Kiser KW, Felten PG, Mozar HN, Niemeyer D. Reducing tobacco consumption in California: development of a statewide antitobacco use campaign, JAMA. 1990;264:1570-1574.
35. Begay ME, Traynor MP, Glantz SA. The tobacco industry, state politics, and tobacco education in California. Am J Public Health. 1993;83:1214-1221.
36. Aguinaga S, Macdonald HR, Traynor MP, Begay ME, Glantz SA. Undermining Popular Government: Tobacco Industry Political Expenditures in California 1993-1994. San Francisco, Calif: Institute for Health Policy. Studies, University of California, San Francisco; 1995.
37. Skolnick A. Court orders governor to restore anti-smoking media campaign funding. JAMA. 1992;267:2721-2723.
38. Skolnick A. Antitobacco advocates fight 'illegal' diversion of tobacco control money. JAMA. 1994;271:1387-1390.
39. Skolnick A. Judge rules diversion of antismoking money illegal. JAMA. 1995;273:610-611.
40. Monardi F, Balbach E, Aguinaga S, Glantz S. Shifting Allegiances: Tobacco Industry Political Expenditures in California, January 1995-March 1996. San Francisco, Calif: institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco; 1996.
41. Macdonald H, Glantz S. The political realities of statewide smoking legislation. California's Assembly Bill 13. Tobacco Control. 1997;6:41-54.
42. Traynor M, Glantz S. The development and passage of Proposition 99. J Health Polit Policy Law. 1996;21:543-585.
43. Bullet Poll. California Smoking Research. Verona, NJ: Hypotenuse Inc; 1994.
44. Attorney General. Title and Summary of the Chief Purpose and Points of the Proposed Measure. 1994. Sacramento, Calif.
45. Hemmila D. Tobacco firm turns the ballot against foes of smoking. Valley Times. May 17, 1994:5A
46. Miller T. Miller Invites Signers of Smoking Petition to Report Misrepresentation; Asks Proponents for Materials. Sacramento, Calif: Secretary of State; 1994. Press release.
47. Secretary of State in LA. to Inform Voters of Misrepresentation in Tobacco Industry Petition Drive. Los Angeles, Calif: Coalition for a Healthy California; 1994. Press release.
48. State investigates new anti-smoking initiative. San Francisco Chronicle. May 12, 1994.
49. Webb G. Panel allows copycat Prop. 188 ads. San Jose Mercury News. November 8, 1994:3B.
50. Glantz S, Slade J, Bero L, Hanauer P, Barnes L. The Cigarette Papers. Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press; 1996.
51. The Best Way to Keep Young People Away from Cigarettes. Californians for Statewide Smoking Restrictions; 1994.
52. What Do People Think about Smoking Laws? Californians for Statewide Smoking Restrictions; 1994.
53. I Should Have the Right to Decide. Cafifomians for Statewide Smoking Restrictions; 1994.
54. Cardador T, Hazan A, Glantz S. Tobacco industry smokers' rights publications: a content analysis. Am J Public Health. 1995;85:1212-1217.
55. A Study of Public Attitudes Toward Cigarette Smoking and the Tobacco Industry. Washington, DC: Roper Organization; 1978.
56. Kern County Smoking Study. Houston, Tex: V Lance Tarrance & Associates; 1982.
57. Highlights from an American Cancer Society Survey of U.S. Voter Attitudes Toward Cigarette Smoking. Boston, Mass: Martilla & Kiley Inc; 1993.
58. A Survey of Voter Attitudes in California. Boston, Mass: Manilla & Kiley Inc; 1994.
59. Argument in Favor of Proposition 188 (and Rebuttal Argument). Californians for Statewide Smoking Restrictions; 1994.
60. Argument against Proposition 188 (and Rebuttal Argument). Californians for Statewide Smoking Restrictions; 1994.
61. Sous SE. Poll finds few voters know about fall initiatives. San Francisco Chronicle. July 28, 1994:A17-A18.
62. Green S. Tough jail-term initiative backed. Sacramento Bee. September 28, 1994.
63. Majorities Favor Prop. 184 (Three Strikes), but Oppose Prop. 186 (Single Payer Health), Opinions of Prop. 188 (Smoking) Are Evenly Split. San Francisco, Calif: Field Institute; 1994. Press release
64. Feldman P.. Times poll: 62 percent would bar services to illegal immigrants. Los Angeles Times. September 14, 1994:A1.
65. Prop. 188 Will Reverse California's Declining Death Rate from Smoking. Coalition for a Healthy California; 1994. Press release, Sacramento, Calif.
66. Morain D. Tobacco giant quietly pushes Prop. 188. Los Angeles Times. October 10, 1994:A1.
67. Morain D. Tobacco industry abandons low profile. Los Angeles Times. October 26, 1994:A3.
68. Levy D. California smoking initiative has tobacco industry foes fuming. USA Today. November 4, 1994:4D.
69. Frick N. Statement of Nancy Frick regarding Proposition 188. Bakersfield, Calif: 1994.
70. Gunther HC. Nonprofit Public Interest Group Announces $2 Million Voter Education Project on Proposition 188. San Francisco, Calif: Public Media Center; 1994. Press release.
71. Webb G. Non-partisan ads draw partisan fire. San Jose Mercury News. October 21, 1994.
72. Russell S. Smoking initiative ad battle heats up. San Francisco Chronicle. October 21, 1994 :A4.
73. Suit complains ads intend to confuse. Oakland Tribune. November 4, 1994:A8.
74. Judge orders Prop. 188 backers to stop using 'copycat' TV ad. San Jose Mercury News. Novembers, 1994.
75. Stations Agreeing to Use the Full Name of Proposition 188's Sponsor. Berkeley, Calif: Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights; 1994.
76. Americans for Nonsmokers ' Rights Files FCC Complaint over Prop 188 Ads. Berkeley, Calif: Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights; 1994.
77. FCC Says Broadcasters Must Disclose Tobacco Ties to Pro-188 Commercials. Sacramento, Calif: Coalition for a Healthy California; 1994. Press release.
78. Bullet Poll Results. Oakland, Calif: American Cancer Society; 1994. Press release.
79. Forster JL, Hourigan ME, Kelder S. Locking devices on cigarette vending machines: evaluation of a city ordinance. Am J Public Health. 1992;82:1217-1219.
80. Kotz K, Forster J. Klochn D. An evaluation of the Minnesota state law to restrict youth access to tobacco. Presented at the 121st Annual Meeting of the American Public Health Association, October 1993, San Francisco, Calif.
81. Moore S, Wolfe S, Lindes D, Douglas CE. Epidemiology of failed tobacco control legislation. JAMA. 1994;272:1171-1175.
82. Califano JA. Revealing the link between campaign financing and deaths caused by tobacco. JAMA. 1994;272:1217-1218.