An alternative statistical approach for predicting prolonged catheterization after burch colposuspension during reconstructive pelvic surgery

International Urogynecology Journal

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 203-208

  Heit, M ^a,c   Vogt, V ^b   Brubaker, L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE   (United States)

^b RUSH MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

^c University of Louisville School of Medicine   (United States)

Author keywords

Burch colposuspension; Urinary incontinence; Voiding dysfunction

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; BLADDER CATHETERIZATION; COLPOSUSPENSION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MENOPAUSE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK FACTOR; STATISTICAL MODEL; STRESS INCONTINENCE; TIME; URETHRA PRESSURE; URINE RETENTION; URODYNAMICS;

EID: 0031438232     PISSN: 09373462     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02765814     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Bhatia N, Bergman A. Use of preoperative uroflowmetry and simultaneous urethrocystometry for predicting risk for prolonged postoperative bladder drainage. Urology 1986;28:440-445
2. Lose G et al. Voiding difficulties after colposuspension. Obstet Gynecol 1987;69:33-38
3. Stanton S, Cardoza L, Chaudbury N. Spontaneous voiding after surgery for urinary incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1978;85:149-152
4. Bhatia N, Bergman A. Urodynamic predictability of voiding following incontinence surgery. Obstet Gynecol 1984;63:85-91
5. Bergman A, Bhatia N. Uroflowmetry: spontaneous versus instrumented. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984;150:788-790
6. Bergman A, Bhatia N. Uroflowmetry for predicting postoperative voiding difficulties in women with stress urinary incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1985;92:835-838
7. Tanagho E. Colpocystourethropexy: the way we do it. J Urol 1976;116:751-753
8. Abrams P, Torrens M. Urine flow studies. Urol Clin North Am 1979;6:71-79
9. Griffiths D, Hofner K, van Mastright R, Jan Rollema H, Spangberg A, Gleason D. The standardization of terminology of the lower urinary tract function: pressure-flow studies avoiding, urethral resistance, and urethral obstructions. Recommended by the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn 1997;16:1-18
10. Bump RC, Hurt WG, Theofrastous JP et al. and the Continence Program for Women Research Group. Randomized prospective comparison of needle colposuspension versus endoplevic fascia plication potential stress incontinence prophylaxis in women undergoing vaginal reconstruction for stage III or IV pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;175:326-335
11. Kapoor R et al. Recovery of bladder function following surgery for stress incontinence: is it delayed in elderly populations? Int Urogynecol J 1993;4:266-270
12. Stanton S, Ozsoy C, Hilton P. Voiding difficulties in the female: prevalence, clinical, and urodynamic review. Obstet Gynecol 1983;61:144-147
13. Kremer C, Freeman R. Which patients are at risk of voiding difficulty immediately after colposuspension. Int Urogynecol J 1995;6:257-261
14. Elbadawi A, Yalla S, Resnick N. Structural basis for geriatric voiding dysfunction. J Urol 1993;150:1650-1656
15. Wall LL, Hewitt JK. Voiding function after Burch colposuspension for stress incontinence. J Reprod Med 1996;41:161-165
16. DeLancey JOL. Structural support of the urethra as it relates to stress urinary incontinence: the hammock hypothesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;170:1713-1720