The recreational value of tropical forests in Malaysia

Journal of World Forest Resource Management

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 183-201

  Garrod, G D ^a   Willis, K G ^a  

^a NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FOREST POLICY; RECREATION AREAS;

MALAYSIA;

EID: 0031432152     PISSN: 02614286     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. American Psychological Association, 1974. Standards for Educational and Psychological Tests. APA, Washington DC.
2. Ajzen I., Brown T.C. and Rosenthal L.H., 1996. Information bias in contingent valuation: effects of personal relevance, quality of information, and motivational orientation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 30: 43-57.
3. Balkan E. and Kahn J.R., 1988. The value of changes in deer hunting quality: a travelcost approach. Applied Economics 20: 533-539.
4. Bockstael N.E., Hanemann W.M. and Strand I.E., 1984. Measuring the benefits of water quality improvements using recreation demand models. Report CR-811043-01-1. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC.
5. Carson R.T., Flores N.E., Martin K.M. and Wright J.L., 1996. Contingent valuation and revealed preferences methodologies: comparing the estimates for quasi-public goods. Land Economics 72: 80-99.
6. Chin T.Y. and Chee T.Y., 1994. Status of social forestry in Malaysia. Paper presented at an Indonesia-Malaysia Seminar on Social Forestry, Sanggua, West Kalimantan. Forestry Department Peninsular Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur.
7. Cummings R.G., Brookshire D.S. and Schulze W.D., 1986. (eds). Valuing Environmental Goods: An Assessment of the Contingent Valuation Method. Rowman and Allanheld, Totowa, New Jersey.
8. Fisher A.C., 1996. The conceptual underpinnings of the contingent valuation method. In Bjornstad D.J. and Kahn J.R. (eds). The Contingent Valuation of Environmental Resources: Methodological Issues and Research Needs. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
9. Hanemann W.M., 1996. Theory versus data in the contingent valuation debate. In Bjornstad D.J. and Kahn J.R. (eds) The Contingent Valuation of Environmental Resources: Methodological Issues and Research Needs (ibid).
10. McKean J.R., Johnson D.M. and Walsh R.G., 1995. Valuing time in travel cost demand analysis: an empirical investigation. Land Economics 71: 96-105.
11. Mitchell R.C. and Carson R.T., 1989. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Resources for the Future, Washington DC.
12. Mohammed Ali and Abdul Razak Bin, 1995. Prominent findings of forestry research in Malaysia. FORSPA Publication No. 10. CAB International, Kuala Lumpur.
13. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 1993. Report of the Panel on Contingent Valuation. Federal Register 58: 4601-4614.
14. Samples K.C., Dixon J.A. and Gowan M.M., 1986. Information disclosure and endangered species. Land Economics 62: 306-312.
15. Schulze W.D., McClelland G., Waldman D. and Lazo J., 1996. Sources of bias in contingent valuation. In Bjornstad D.J. and Kahn J.R. (eds) Land Economics (ibid).
16. Wan Sabri Wan Mansor, 1994. Recreation resource characteristics and classification of forest recreation areas for sustainable management. Report to the Forestry Department Peninsular Malaysia. University Pertanian Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur.
17. Willis K.G. and Garrod G.D., 1991a. Valuing open access recreation on inland waterways: on-site recreation surveys and selection effects. Regional Studies 25: 511-524.
18. Willis K.G. and Garrod G.D., 1991b. An individual travel cost method of evaluating forest recreation. Journal of Agricultural Economics 42: 33-42.
19. Willis K.G., 1995. Contingent valuation in a policy context: the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Report and its implications for the use of contingent valuation methods in policy analysis in Britain. In Willis K.G. and Corkindale J.T. (eds). Environmental Valuation: New Perspectives. CAB International, Wallingford, Oxfordshire.
20. Winpenny J.T., 1991. Values for the Environment: A Guide to Economic Appraisal. HMSO, London.