Unit roots and structural breaks: The case of India 1900-1988

Journal of Applied Statistics

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 289-300

  Ghatak, Anita ^a  

^a DE MONTFORT UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MACROECONOMIC TRENDS; NATIONAL ECONOMY; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS; UNIT ROOT HYPOTHESIS;

INDIA;

EID: 0031429069     PISSN: 02664763     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02664769723693     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. ANDREWS, D. (1992) Tests for parameter instability and structural change with unknown change point, Econometrica, 61, pp. 821-856.
2. BALAKRISHNAN, P. (1991) Pricing and Inflation in India (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
3. BANERJEE, A., LUMSDAINE, R. L. & STOCK, J. H. (1992) Recursive and sequential tests of the unit root and trend-break hypotheses: theory and international evidence, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 10, pp. 271-287.
4. Box, G. E. P. & TIAO, G. C. (1975) Intervention analysis with applications to economic and environmental problems, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70, pp. 70-79.
5. CAMPBELL, J. Y. & MANKIW, N. G. (1989) International evidence on the persistence of economic fluctuations, Journal of Monetary Economics, 23, pp. 319-333.
6. DICKEY, D. A. & Fuller, W. A. (1979) Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time-series with a unit root, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, pp. 427-431.
7. DUCK, N. W. (1992) U.K. evidence on breaking trend functions, Oxford Economic Papers, 44, pp. 426-439.
8. FAULKNER, H. W. (1960) American Economic History (Evanston, NY, Harper & Row).
9. GEMMELL, N. (Ed.) (1987) Surveys in Development Economics (Oxford, Basil Blackwell).
10. GHATAK, A. (1985) Consumer Behaviour in India (New Delhi, D.K. Agencies).
11. GHATAK, S. (1995) Introduction to Development Economics (London, Routledge).
12. GHATAK, A. (1996) Breaking trend functions in macro-variables: the case of India: 1900-1988, SANKHYA Series B, 58, pp. 274-287.
13. GOVERNMENT OF INDIA (1991) Economic Survey of India (Central Statistical Office).
14. LEWIS, A. W. (1954) Economic development with unlimited supplies of labour, Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies, 22, pp. 139-191.
15. LIVINGSTONE, I. (Ed.) (1981) Development Economics and Policy Readings (Allen and Unwin).
16. MEIER, G. M. (1984) Leading Issues in Economic Development (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
17. MUKERJI, K. (1965) Levels of Economic Activity and Public Expenditure in India: A Historical and Quantitative Study (Poone, Gokhale Institute of Politics and Economics).
18. NELSON, C. R. & PLOSSER, C. I. (1982) Trends and random walks in macroeconomic time series, Journal of Monetary Economics, 10, pp. 139-162.
19. PERRON, P. (1989) The great crash, the oil price shock, and the unit root hypothesis, Econometrica, 57, pp. 1361-1401.
20. PHILLIPS, P. C. B. & PERRON, P. (1988) Testing for a unit root in time series regression, Biometrika, 75, pp. 335-346.
21. RAJ, B. & SLOTTJE, J. (1994) The trend behaviour of alternative income inequality measures in the United States from 1947-1990 and the structural break, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 12, pp. 479-487.
22. STULZ, R. M. & WASSERFALLEN, W. (1985) Macroeconomic time series, business cycles and macro-economic policies. In: K. BRUNNER & A. H. METZLER (Eds), Understanding Monetary Regimes, Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 22, pp. 9-54.
23. VAIDYANATHAN, A. (1995) The Indian Economy: Crisis, Response and Prospects (London, Delhi, Sangam Books).
24. VAKIL, F. (1973) Indian saving behaviour: reconciliation between time-series and cross section evidence, Review of Income and Wealth, 19, pp. 307-323.
25. WASSERFALLEN, W. (1986) Non-stationarities in macro-economic time series-further evidence and implications, Canadian Journal of Economics, 19, pp. 498-510.
26. ZIVOT, E. & ANDREWS, D. W. K. (1992) Further evidence on the great crash, the oil-price shock and the unit root hypothesis, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 10, pp. 251-270.