A comparison of two references for using knowledge of performance in learning a motor task

Journal of Motor Behavior

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 339-350

  Brisson, Therese A ^a   Alain, Claude ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK   (Canada)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Criterion template patterns; Kinematic feedback; Knowledge of performance; Knowledge of results; Motor learning

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; KINESIOLOGY; LEARNING; LONG TERM MEMORY; MALE; MOTOR COORDINATION; NORMAL HUMAN; PSYCHOMOTOR ACTIVITY; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 0031427321     PISSN: 00222895     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00222899709600020     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Brisson, T. A., & Alain, C. (1996a). Should common optimal movement patterns be identified as the criterion to be achieved? Journal of Motor Behavior, 28, 211-223.
2. Brisson, T. A., & Alain, C. (1996b). Knowledge of performance provided without criterion information enhances the learning of a coincident timing task. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 67, 458-464.
3. Carroll, W. R., & Bandura, A. (1982). The role of visual monitoring in observational learning of action patterns: Making the unobservable observable. Journal of Motor Behavior, 14, 153-167.
4. Carroll, W. R., & Bandura, A. (1985). Role of timing of visual monitoring and motor rehearsal in observational learning of action patterns. Journal of Motor Behavior, 17, 269-281.
5. Carroll, W. R., & Bandura, A. (1987). Translating cognition into action: The role of visual guidance in observational learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 19, 385-398.
6. Carroll, W. R., & Bandura, A. (1990). Representational guidance of action production in observational learning: A causal analysis. Journal of Motor Behavior, 22, 85-97.
7. Del Rey, P. (1971). The effects of video-taped feedback on form accuracy and latency in an open and closed environment. Journal of Motor Behavior, 3, 281-287.
8. English, H. B. (1942). How psychology can facilitate military training: A concrete example. Journal of Applied Psychology, 26, 3-7.
9. Gentile, A. M. (1972). A working model of skill acquisition with application to teaching. Quest, 17, 3-23.
10. Hatze, H. (1976). Biomechanical aspects of a successful motion optimization. In P. V. Komi (Ed.), Biomechanics V-B (pp. 1-12). Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
11. Howell, M. L. (1956). Use of force-time graphs for performance analysis in facilitating motor learning. Research Quarterly, 27, 12-27.
12. Kernodle, M. W., & Carlton, M. J. (1992). Information feedback and the learning of multiple-degrees-of-freedom activities. Journal of Motor Behavior, 24, 187-196.
13. Newell, K. M., & Boucher, J.-L. P. (1974). Motor response recognition: Two process. Journal of Motor Behavior, 6, 81-86.
14. Newell, K. M., & Carlton, M. J. (1987). Augmented information feedback and the acquisition of isometric tasks. Journal of Motor Behavior, 19, 4-12.
15. Newell, K. M., Carlton, M. J., & Antoniou, A. (1990). The interaction of criterion and feedback information in learning a drawing task. Journal of Motor Behavior, 22, 536-552.
16. Newell, K. M., Quinn, J. T., Sparrow, W. A., & Walter, C. B., (1983). Kinematic information feedback for learning a simple rapid response. Human Movement Science, 2, 255-270.
17. Newell, K. M., Sparrow, W. A., & Quinn, J. T. (1985). Kinetic information feedback for learning isometric tasks. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 11, 113-123.
18. Nickerson, R. S., Kalikow, D. N., & Stevens, K. N. (1976). Computer-aided speech training for the deaf. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 41, 120-132.
19. Salmoni, A. W., Schmidt, R. A., & Walter, C. B. (1984). Knowledge of results and motor learning: A review and critical appraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 355-386.
20. Schmidt, R. A. (1988). Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis (2nd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
21. Schmidt, R. A., & Young, D. E. (1991). Methodology for motor learning: A paradigm for kinematic feedback. Journal of Motor Behavior, 23, 13-24.
22. Wallace, S. A., & Hagler, R. W. (1979). Knowledge of performance and the learning of a closed motor skill. Research Quarterly, 50, 265-271.
23. Warren, C. G., & Lehmann, J. F. (1975). Training procedures and biofeedback methods to achieve controlled partial weight bearing: An assessment. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 56, 449-445.
24. Winstein, C. J., & Schmidt, R. A., (1990). Reduced frequency of knowledge of results enhances motor skill learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 16, 677-691.
25. Wulf, G. (1992). The learning of generalized motor programs and motor schemata: Effects of KR relative frequency and contextual interference. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 23, 53-76.
26. Wulf, G., & Schmidt, R. A. (1994). Feedback-induced variability and the learning of generalized motor programs. Journal of Motor Behavior, 26, 348-361.
27. Wulf, G., Schmidt, R. A., & Deubel, H. (1993). Reduced feedback frequency enhances generalized motor program learning but not parameterization learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 19, 1134-1150.
28. Young, D. E., & Schmidt, R. A. (1992). Augmented kinematic feedback for motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 24, 261-273.