Insect Visual perception: Complex abilities of simple nervous systems

Current Opinion in Neurobiology

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 505-513

  Giurfa, Martin ^a   Menzel, Randolf ^a  

^a FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPOUND EYE; FLIGHT; INSECT; NEUROPIL; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECOGNITION; REVIEW; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL NERVOUS SYSTEM; VISUAL ORIENTATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 0031426324     PISSN: 09594388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0959-4388(97)80030-X     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Menzel R, Müller U. Learning and memory in honeybees: from behavior to neural substrates. Annu Rev Neurosci. 19:1996;379-404.
2. Srinivasan MV, Zhang SW, Rolfe B. Is pattern vision in insects mediated by 'cortical' processing? Nature. 362:1995;539-540.
3. Wehner R. Arthropods. Papi F. Animal Homing. 1992;45-144 Chapman and Hall, London.
4. Gould JL. The locale map of honey bees: do insects have cognitive maps? Science. 232:1986;861-863.
5. Bennett ATD. Do animals have cognitive maps? J Exp Biol. 199:1996;219-244.
6. Wehner R, Michel B, Antonsen P. Visual navigation in insects: coupling of egocentric and geocentric information. J Exp Biol. 199:1996;129-140.
7. Menzel R, Geiger K, Chittka L, Joerges J, Kunze J, Müller U. The knowledge base of bee navigation. J Exp Biol. 199:1996;141-146.
8. Menzel R, Chittka L, Geiger K, Joerges J, Müller U. Bees travel novel homeward routes by integrating separately acquired vector memories. of outstanding interest Anim Behav. 1997; The authors employed a paradigm in which it was possible to separate experimentally target-directed orientation and navigation in the bee according to the memories of vectors. If two different vector memories are established simultaneously, they are specifically associated with the memories of the local landmark features at the goal. When the bees are released from a novel site, the two different vector memories leading back from two separate goals to the hive can be activated together by landmark features that resemble partially those of the two goals to which they were attached originally. The two activated vector memories are then integrated, leading to a novel flight route pointing directly towards the hive (see Figure 1).
9. Collett TS, Baron J. Learnt sensori-motor mappings in honeybees: interpolation and its possible relevance to navigation. of outstanding interest J Comp Physiol. 177:1995;287-298 Bees were trained to fly along a prescribed route through a large box partitioned into compartments. The back walls of the compartments presented gratings of black and white stripes with a given orientation such that stripe orientation could be associated with a flight turn to the right or to the left. Bees learned the task, thus associating flight direction and stripe orientation. Moreover, grating orientations between the trained values resulted in flight directions that were intermediate with respect to those flown during training. This result indicates that bees can interpolate between stripe orientations and that there is a continuous representation between stripe orientation and flight direction.
10. Esch HE, Burns JE. Honeybees use optic flow to measure the distance of a food source. Naturwissenschaften. 82:1995;38-40.
11. Esch HE, Burns JE. Distance estimation by foraging honeybees. J Exp Biol. 199:1996;155-162.
12. Srinivasan MV, Zhang SW, Lehrer M, Collett TS. Honeybee navigation en route to the goal: visual flight control and odometry. of outstanding interest J Exp Biol. 199:1996;237-244 This paper shows that bees trained to fly a constant distance within a tunnel estimate such a distance by integrating the motion of the image of the visual panorama provided by ventral as well as lateral gratings of black and white stripes. It is shown that doubling or halving the period of the gratings, or presenting tail or head wind to the flying bees does not affect the bees' performance of localising the correct distance within the tunnel. Only when image motion cues were removed by presenting axially oriented stripes on the walls and the floor of the tunnel, were the bees unable to gauge the distance travelled. This shows that bees measured the distance travelled by integrating the image speed of the visual panorama, and that such a parameter is measured independently of the texture of the image.
13. Schöne H. Optokinetic speed control and estimation of travel distance in walking honeybees. J Comp Physiol [A]. 179:1996;587-592.
14. Ronacher B, Wehner R. Desert ants Cataglyphis fortis use self-induced optic flow to measure distances travelled. J Comp Physiol [A]. 177:1995;21-27.
15. Ibbotson MR. A motion-sensitive visual descending neuron in Apis mellifera monitoring translatory flow-fields in the horizontal plane. J Exp Biol. 157:1991;573-577.
16. Collett TS, Fry SN, Wehner R. Sequence learning by honeybees. J Comp Physiol [A]. 172:1993;693-706.
17. Chittka L, Geiger K. Can honeybees count landmarks? Anim Behav. 49:1995;159-164.
18. Chittka L, Geiger K. Honeybee long-distance orientation in a controlled environment. Ethology. 99:1995;117-126.
19. Chittka L, Geiger K, Kunze J. The influences of landmarks on distance estimation of honey bees. Anim Behav. 50:1995;23-31.
20. Giurfa M, Vorobyev M, Kevan P, Menzel R. Detection of coloured stimuli by honeybees: minimum visual angles and receptor specific contrasts. J Comp Physiol [A]. 178:1996;699-709.
21. Lehrer M, Bischof S. Detection of model flowers by honeybees: the role of chromatic and achromatic contrast. Naturwissenschaften. 82:1995;145-147.
22. Giurfa M, Vorobyev M, Brandt R, Posner B, Menzel R. Discrimination of coloured stimuli by honeybees: alternative use of achromatic and chromatic signals. of special interest J Comp Physiol [A]. 180:1997;235-243 Honeybees make use of their colour vision system as well as a green-receptor based achromatic system for detecting coloured stimuli (see also [20]). The minimum visual angle required for detection of a coloured stimulus is 15° if the stimulus presents chromatic contrast but not green contrast, whilst it is 5° if it presents both kinds of contrast. Both systems are used alternatively depending on the visual angle subtended by the targets at the bee's eye: at larger visual angles (>15°), bees use the chromatic properties of the targets, whereas at smaller ones (~5°), they use the achromatic green contrast. Thus, the green receptor contrast is not used for recognition and not learned at a distance at which the colour signal is perceived. Together with [20], the data indicate that large field object recognition is devoid of the achromatic signal and that the perception and learning of the achromatic signal has a low and a high threshold.
23. Zhang SW, Bartsch K, Srinivasan MV. Maze learning by honeybees. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 66:1996;267-282.
24. Collett TS, Baron J, Sellen K. On the encoding of movement vectors by honeybees. Are distance and direction represented independently? of outstanding interest J Comp Physiol [A]. 179:1996;395-406 This paper is similar to [9] but the bees were initially trained successfully to associate trajectory length with stripe orientation. As for direction, bees could interpolate between trained stripe orientations and choose intermediate flight lengths when presented with intermediate stripe orientations. Moreover, in a different arena in which trajectory length and directions could be varied with respect to the orientation of gratings presented in each compartment, bees flew trajectories that indicated that length and direction are not treated separately. Establishment of a new trajectory from learned, existing ones seems to follow rules similar to those of vector averaging.
25. Vorobyev M, Kunze J, Gumbert A, Giurfa M, Menzel R. Flowers through the insect eyes. Dafni A, Giurfa M, Menzel R. Insect Vision and Flower Recognition. 1997;Laser Pages Publications, Jerusalem. in press.
26. Srinivasan MV. Pattern recognition in the honeybee: recent progress. J Insect Physiol. 40:1994;183-194.
27. Heisenberg M. Pattern recognition in insects. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 5:1995;475-481.
28. Dill M, Wolf R, Heisenberg M. Visual pattern recognition in Drosophila involves retinotopic matching. Nature. 365:1993;751-753.
29. Ronacher B, Duft U. An image-matching mechanism describes a generalization task in honeybees. J Comp Physiol [A]. 178:1996;803-812.
30. Zeil J, Kelber A, Voss R. Structure and function of learning flights in bees and wasps. of special interest J Exp Biol. 199:1996;245-252 Bees and wasps leaving their nest perform ritualised semicircular learning flights in which they face towards the nest entrance and keep its image stationary on the retina. The structure of these learning flights may indicate that visual memory is not established in a continuous process but rather as a flash memory at the moment when the animal has reached a particular vantage point.
31. Zeil J. The control of optic flow during learning flights. J Comp Physiol [A]. 180:1996;25-38.
32. Collett TS. Making learning easy: the acquisition of visual information during the orientation flights of social wasps. J Comp Physiol [A]. 177:1995;737-747.
33. Collett TS, Baron J. Biological compasses and the coordinate frame of landmark memories in honeybees. Nature. 368:1994;137-140.
34. Frier HJ, Edwards E, Smith C, Neale S, Collett TS. Magnetic compass cues and visual pattern learning in honeybees. J Exp Biol. 199:1996;1353-1361.
35. Srinivasan MV, Zhang SW, Witney K. Visual discrimination of pattern orientation by honeybees: performance and implications for cortical processing. Phil Trans R Soc Lond [Biol]. 343:1994;199-210.
36. Giger AD, Srinivasan MV. Pattern recognition in honeybees: eidetic imagery and orientation discrimination. J Comp Physiol [A]. 176:1995;791-795.
37. Giger AD, Srinivasan MV. Pattern recognition in honeybees: chromatic properties of orientation analysis. J Comp Physiol [A]. 178:1996;763-769.
38. O'Carroll D. Feature-detecting neurons in dragonfiles. Nature. 362:1993;541-543.
39. Yang EC, Maddess T. Orientation-sensitive neurons in the brain of the honey bee (Apis mellifera). J Insect Physiol. 43:1997;329-336.
40. Giurfa M, Eichmann B, Menzel R. Symmetry perception in an insect. of outstanding interest Nature. 382:1996;458-461 Single, individually marked honeybees were trained over a succession of eight triads. A group of bees was trained for symmetry and another for symmetry. The triads of the former group consisted each of a rewarded symmetric stimulus and two different nonrewarded asymmetric stimuli presented simultaneously. Each trial of the asymmetric group consisted of a rewarded, asymmetric stimulus and two different nonrewarded symmetric stimuli (Figure 2). Training on each triad was interspersed with multiple-choice, generalisation tests during which novel stimuli, symmetric and asymmetric, were presented (Figure 2). The patterns tested were chosen such that only symmetry but not other parameter (area, contour length, overall orientation, etc.) could account for stimuli discrimination. From test seven onwards, bees extracted the symmetry or asymmetry as an independent feature and transferred it to the novel stimuli. The results indicate that bees are able to form generalised representation of symmetry versus asymmetry.
41. Giurfa M, Núñez JA, Chittka L, Menzel R. Colour preferences of flower-naive honeybees. J Comp Physiol [A]. 177:1995;247-259.
42. Horridge A. The honeybees (Apis mellifera) detects bilateral symmetry and discriminate its axis. J Insect Physiol. 42:1996;755-764.
43. Lehrer M, Horridge GA, Zhang SW, Gadagkar R. Shape vision in bees: innate preference for flower-like patterns. Phil Trans R Soc Lond [Biol]. 347:1995;123-137.
44. Horridge A, Zhang SW. Pattern vision in honeybees (Apis mellifera): flower-like patterns with no predominant orientation. J Insect Physiol. 41:1995;681-688.
45. Gallant JL, Braun J, Van Essen DC. Selectivity for polar, hyperbolic and Cartesian gratings in macaque visual cortex. Science. 259:1993;100-103.
46. Morrone MC, Burr DC, Vaina LM. Two stages of visual processing for radial and circular motion. Nature. 376:1995;507-509.