Constriction of the visual field of children after early visual deprivation

Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus

Volumn 34, Issue 6, 1997, Pages 347-356

  Bowering, Elizabeth R ^a   Maurer, Daphne ^b,c   Lewis, Terri L ^b,c   Brent, Henry P ^c  

^a MOUNT SAINT VINCENT UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c HOSPITAL FOR SICK CHILDREN   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CATARACT; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; HUMAN; MONOCULAR DEPRIVATION; PERIPHERAL VISION; VISUAL DEPRIVATION; VISUAL DISORDER; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; CATARACT; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; HUMANS; INFANT; PERIMETRY; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SENSORY DEPRIVATION; TIME FACTORS; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISION, LOW; VISION, MONOCULAR; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 0031424841     PISSN: 01913913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Bisti S, Carmignoto G. Monocular deprivation in kittens differently affects crossed and uncrossed visual pathways. Vision Res. 1986;26:875-884
2. Heitlander H, Hoffmann K-P. The visual field of monocularly deprived cats after late closure or enucleation of the non-deprived eye. Brain Res. 1978;145:153-160.
3. Sherman SM. Visual field defects in monocularly and binocularly deprived cats. Brain Res. 1973;49:25-45.
4. Sherman SM. Permanence of visual perimetry deficits in monocularly and binocularly deprived cats. Brain Res. 1974a;73:491-501.
5. van Hof-van Duin J. Visual field measurements in monocularly deprived and normal cats. Exp Brain Res. 1977;30:353-368.
6. Hendrickson A, Boles J, McLean E. Visual acuity and behavior of monocularly deprived monkeys after retinal lesions. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1977;16:169-173.
7. Joseph R, Casagrande VA. Visual deficits and recovery following monocular lid closure in a prosimian primate. Behav Brain Res. 1980;1:165-186.
8. Sparks DL, Mays LE, Gurski MR, Hickey TL. Long-and short-term deprivation in the rhesus monkey: Effects on visual fields and optokinetic nystagmus. J Neurosci. 1986;6:1771-1780.
9. Wilson JR, Lavallee KA, Joosse MV, Hendrickson AE, Boothe RG, Harwerth RS. Visual fields of monocularly deprived monkeys. Behav Brain Res. 1989;33:13-22.
10. Wilson JR, Nevins CL. Effects of monocular deprivation on the visual fields of squirrel monkeys. Behav Brain Res. 1991;44:129-131.
11. Kalil R. Dark rearing in the cat: Effects on visuomotor behavior and cell growth in the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus. J Comp Neurol. 1978;178:451-468.
12. Maire-Lepoivre E, Przybyslawski J, Gary-Bobo E. Visual field in dark-reared cats after an extended period of recovery. Behav Brain Res. 1988;28:245-251.
13. Tumosa N, Tieman SB, Hirsch HVB. Visual field defects in cats reared with unequal alternating monocular exposure. Exp Brain Res. 1982;47:119-129.
14. Sherman SM. Monocularly deprived cats: Improvement of the deprived eye's vision by visual decortication. Science. 1974b;186:267-269.
15. Sherman SM, Sprague JM. Effects of visual cortex lesions upon the visual fields of monocularly deprived cats. J Comp Neurol. 1979;88:291-312.
16. Smith DC, Holdefer RN, Reeves TM. The visual field in monocularly deprived cats and its permanence. Behav Brain Res. 1982;5:245-259.
17. Abdolvahab-Emminger H, Sireteanu R. Residual visual properties in human amblyopia after monocular deprivation early in life. Clinical Vision Sciences. 1993;8:263-279.
18. Bowering ER, Maurer D, Lewis TL, Brent HP. Sensitivity in the nasal and temporal hemifields in children treated for cataract. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993;34:3501-3509.
19. Lewis TL, Maurer D, Brent HP. Effects on perceptual development of visual deprivation during infancy. Br J Ophthalmol. 1986;70:214-220.
20. Maurer D, Lewis TL, Brent HP. Peripheral vision and optokinetic nystagmus in children with unilateral congenital cataracts. Behav Brain Res. 1983;10:151-161.
21. Mioche I, Perenin MT. Central and peripheral residual vision in humans with bilateral deprivation amblyopia. Exp Brain Res. 1986;62:259-272.
22. Moran J, Gordon B. Long term visual deprivation in a human. Vision Res. 1982;22:27-36.
23. Harrington DH, Drake MV. Visual Fields: Text and Atlas of Clinical Perimetry. 6th ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 1990.
24. Anderson DR. Perimetry with and without automation. 2nd ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 1987.
25. Bowering E, Maurer D, Lewis TL, Brent P, Brent HP. Development of the visual field in normal and binocularly deprived children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1989;30(suppl.):377.
26. Bowering E, Maurer D, Lewis TL, Riedel P, Brent HP. The visual field in childhood: Normal development and the influence of deprivation. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience Technical Report. 1996; 96:1.
27. Keppel G, Zedeck S. Data analysis for research designs: Analysis of variance and multiple regression/correlation approaches. New York, NY: WH Freeman and Company; 1989.
28. Maurer D, Lewis TL. Visual outcomes in infant cataract. In: Simons K, ed. Early visual development: Normal and abnormal. Committee on Vision, Commission on Behavioural and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1993:454-484.
29. Beasley H. The visual fields in aphakia. Trans Amer Ophthalmol Soc. 1965;63:363-416.
30. Williams TD. Aging and central visual field area. American Journal of Optometry & Physiological Optics. 1983;60:888-891.
31. Atchison DA. Effects of defocus on visual field measurement. Ophthalmologica. 1987;173:364-374.
32. Benedetto MD, Cyrlin MN. The effect of blur on static perimetric thresholds. In: Heijl A, Greve EL, eds. Proceedings of the Sixth International Visual Field Symposium. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Dr. W. Junk Publishers; 1975:563-567.
33. Dobree JH, Weale RA. Cited by: Weale RA. Problems of peripheral vision. Br J Ophthalmol. 1956;40:392-415.
34. Fankhauser F, Enoch JM. The effect of blur upon static perimetric thresholds. Arch Ophthalmol. 1962;68:120-131.
35. Rempt F, Hoogerheide J, Hoogenboom WPH. Influence of correction of peripheral refractive errors on peripheral static vision. Ophthalmologica. 1976;173:128-135.
36. Micheals DD. Visual optics and refraction: A clinical approach. St. Louis, MO: CV Mosby Company; 1975.
37. Ferree CL, Rand G, Sloan LL. The effect of size of pupil on the form and color fields. J Gen Psych. 1934;10:83-99.
38. Forbes M. Influence of miotics on visual fields in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol. 1966;5:139-145.
39. Mikelberg FS, Drance SM, Schulzer M, Wijsman K. The effect of miosis on visual field indices. In: Greve EL, Heijl A, eds. Documenta Ophthalmologica Proceeding Series of the Seventh International Visual Field Symposium. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Dr. W. Junk Publishers; 1987:645-649.
40. Bedwell CH, Davies SA. The effect of pupil size on multiple static quantitative visual field threshold. In: Greve EL, ed. Documenta Ophthalmologica Proceeding Series of the Second International Visual Field Symposium. Tubingen, the Netherlands: Dr. W. Junk Publishers; 1977:363-371.
41. Lindstrom EE, Tredici TJ, Martin BG. Effects of topical ophthalmic 2 percent Pilocarpine on visual performance of normal subjects. Aerospace Medicine. 1968;39:1236-1240.
42. McCluskey DJ, Douglas JP, O'Connor PS, Story K, Ivy LM, Harvey JS. The effect of Pilocarpine on the visual field in normals. Ophthalmology. 1986;93:843-846.
43. Radzikhovsky BL. Effect of pilocarpine on the width of the field of vision in normal and glaucomatous eyes. Vestn Oftalmol. 1972;85:10-14.
44. Bennett AG, Rabbetts RB. Clinical Visual Optics. 2nd ed. London: utterworths; 1989.
45. Aspinall PA. Variables affecting the retinal threshold gradient in static perimetry. Edinburgh, Scotland: University of Edinburgh; 1967. Thesis.
46. Brenton RS, Phelps CD. The normal visual field on the Humphrey field analyzer. Ophthalmologica. 1986;193:56-74.
47. Drance SM, Berry V, Hughes A. Studies on the effects of age on the central and peripheral isopters of the visual field in normal subjects. Am J Ophthalmol. 1967;63:1667-1672.
48. Charman WN. The retinal image in the human eye. In: Osborne NO, ed. Progress in retinal research, II. New York, NY: Pergamon Press; 1983:1-50.
49. Humphrey Instruments Inc. Owner's Manual for the Humphrey Auto Keratometer (Model 420, Part No. 19003A). San Leandro, Ca: Author; 1987 (May).
50. Woolf D. Investigation of the variation and the correlation of the optical elements of human eyes. American Journal of Optometry & Archives of American Academy of Optometry. 1948;25:218-232.
51. Bier N, Lowther GE. Contact lens correction. London, England: Butterworths; 1977.
52. Aggarwal DP, Verma G. Static perimetry in the study of amblyopic scotoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 1980;64:713-716.
53. Fusco R, D'Aietti M, Verriest G. The visual field in alternating hyperphoria. In: Greve EL, Heijl A, eds. Proceedings of the Fifth International Visual Field Symposium. The Hague, The Netherlands: Dr. W. Junk Publishers; 1983:429-432.
54. Inoue K, Mimura O, Kani K, Ohmi E. Distribution of retinal sensitivity in amblyopia with eccentric fixation. In: Heijl A, Greve EL, eds. Proceedings of the Sixth Visual Field Symposium. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Dr. W. Junk Publishers; 1985:499-505.
55. Jacobson SG, Sandberg MA, Berson EL. Static fundus perimetry in amblyopia: Comparison with juvenile macular degeneration. In: Greve EL, Heijl A, eds. Proceedings of the Fifth International Visual Field Symposium. The Hague, The Netherlands: Dr. W. Junk Publishers; 1983:421-427.
56. Joosse MV, Wilson JR, Boothe RG. Monocular visual fields of macaque monkeys with naturally occurring strabismus. Clinical Vision Sciences. 1990;5:101-111.
57. Mahendrasti R, Verriest G. Monocular and binocular visual fields in different types of strabismus. In: Heijl A, Greve EL, eds. Proceedings of the Sixth International Visual Field Symposium. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Dr. W. Junk Publishers; 1985:507-509.
58. Mehdorn E. Nasal field defects in strabismic amblyopia. In: Jay B, ed. Detection and Measurement of Visual Impairments in Pre-verbal Children, Documenta Ophthalmologica Proceeding Series, 45. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Dr. W. Junk Publishers; 1986:318-326.
59. Nawratzki I, Jampolsky A. A regional hemiretinal difference in amblyopia. Am J Ophthalmol. 1958;46:339-344.
60. Sireteanu R, Fronius M. Visual field losses in strabismic amblyopes. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 1989;194:261-269.
61. Sireteanu R, Fronius M. Human amblyopia: Structure of the visual field. Exp Brain Res. 1990;79:603-614.
62. Sireteanu R, Lagreze W-D, Constantinescu DH. Distortions in 2-dimensional visual space perception in strabismic observers. Vision Res. 1993;33:677-690.
63. Wortham E, Greenwald MJ. Expanded binocular peripheral visual fields following surgery for esotropia. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1989;26:109-112.
64. Maurer D, Lewis TL. The development of peripheral vision and its physiological underpinnings. In: Weiss MJ, Zelazo PR, eds. Newborn attention: Biological constraints and the influence of experience. Norwood, NJ: Ablex; 1991:218-255.
65. Heersema DJ, van Hof-van Duin J, Hop WCJ. Age norms for visual field development in children age 0 to 4 years using arc perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1989;30(suppl.):242.
66. van Hof-van Duin J, Mohn G. Early detection of visual impairments. In: Galjaard H, Precht HFR, Velickovic M, eds. Early Detection and Management of Cerebral Palsy. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers; 1987:79-100.
67. Tumosa N, Tieman HL, Hirsch HVB. Unequal alternating monocular deprivation causes asymmetric visual fields in cats. Science. 1980;208:421-423.
68. Tieman HL, Hirsch HVB. Removal of more experienced eye decreases visual field deficits in cats reared with unequal alternating monocular exposure. Brain Res. 1983;271:170-173.
69. Maurer D, Lewis TL, Brent HP. The effects of deprivation on human visual development: Studies of children treated for cataracts. In: Morrison FJ, Lord CE, Keating DP, eds. Applied Developmental Psychology, III. San Diego, Ca:Academic Press; 1989:139-227.
70. Mitchell DE, Timney B. Postnatal development of function in the mammalian visual system. In: Dorian-Smith I, ed. Handbook of Physiology: The Nervous System, III. Sensory Processes. Part 1. Bethesda, Md: American Physiology Society; 1984.
71. Sherman SM, Spear PD. Organization of visual pathways in normal and visually deprived cats. Physiol Rev. 1982;62:738-855.