Integrated remote sensing and geophysical techniques for locating canal seepage in Nebraska

Journal of Applied Geophysics

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 143-154

  Engelbert, P J ^a   Hotchkiss, R H ^b   Kelly, W E ^c  

^a HDR ENGINEERING INC   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

^c CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA   (United States)

Author keywords

Canal seepage; Geophysical techniques; Nebraska; Remote sensing

Indexed keywords

CANALS; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY MEASUREMENT; ELECTROMAGNETISM; INFRARED IMAGING; RADAR; REMOTE SENSING; SEEPAGE;

CANAL SEEPAGE LOCATION;

GEOPHYSICS;

CANAL; CANAL SEEPAGE; DETECTION; ELECTROMAGNETIC SURVEY; GEOPHYSICAL METHOD; GROUND PENETRATING RADAR; REMOTE SENSING; RESISTIVITY; SEEPAGE;

USA, NEBRASKA, PLATTE RIVER;

EID: 0031424182     PISSN: 09269851     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0926-9851(97)00022-0     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Beres, M. Jr., Haeni, F.P., 1991. Applications of ground-penetrating radar methods in hydrogeologic studies. Groundwater 29 (3), 375-386.
2. Bisdorf, R.J., 1985. Electrical techniques for engineering applications. Assoc. Eng. Geol. Bull. 22 (4), 421-433.
3. Bogolovsky, V.A., Ogilvy, A.A., 1972. Natural potential anomalies as a quantitative index of the rate of seepage from water reservoirs. Geophys. Prospect. 18 (2), 261-268.
4. Bouwer, H., 1978. Ground Water Hydrolog. McGraw-Hill Publishing Co., New York.
5. Central Nebraska Public Power and Irrigation District, 1992. Telephone conversation with Jerry Steinke, Irrigation Engineer.
6. Curtis, B.A., 1988. The Use of Vertical Electric Soundings to Determine Groundwater Recharge Potential. M.S. Thesis, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE.
7. Curtis, B., Kelly, W.E., 1990. Resistivity-recharge relationships - Field study . J. Hydrol. 188, 39-53.
8. Frohlich, R.K., Parke, C.D., 1989. The electrical resistivity of the vadose zone - Field survey. Groundwater 27 (4), 524-530.
9. Gupta, R.S., 1989. Hydrology and Hydraulic Systems. Prentice Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
10. Hiergesell, R.A., 1984. Descriptive, Geologic, and Borehole Geophysical Logs for 23 Test Holes in South-Central Nebraska. U.S. Geol. Surv., Open-File Report 84-073.
11. Kalinski, R.J., 1992. Surface Geoelectrics for Characterizing Ground Water Protective Layers and Compacted Soil Liners. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE.
12. Kearey, P., Brooks, M., 1984. An Introduction to Geophysical Exploration. Houghton-Mifflin Co., Boston.
13. Koefoed, O., 1979. Geosounding Principles 1, Resistivity Sounding Measurements. Elsevier, Amsterdam-New York.
14. McDonald, H.R., Wantland, D., 1960. Geophysical procedures in ground water study. ASCE J. Irrig. Drainage 86 (3), 13-26.
15. Meyer, V.I., 1975. Manual of Remote Sensing. American Society of Photogrammetry, Falls Church, VA.
16. Nellis, M.D., 1982. Application of thermal infrared imagery to canal leakage detection. Remote Sensing Environ. 12, 229-234.
17. Orellana, E., Mooney, H.M., 1966. Master Tables and Curves for Vertical Electrical Sounding over Layered Structures. Madrid, Spain.
18. Peckenpaugh, J.M., Dugan, J.T., Kern, R.A., Schroeder, W.J., 1987. Hydrogeology of the Tri-Basin and Parts of the Lower Republican and Central Platte Natural Resources Districts, Nebraska. U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, DC.
19. Wantland, D., 1953. Experimental Resistivity Investigations on Canal Seepage Problems, Geology Report No. 125, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Denver, CO.
20. Worstel, R.V., 1976. Estimating seepage losses from canal systems. ASCE J. Irrig. Drainage 102, 137-147.
21. Zohdy, A.A.R., Eaton, G.P., Mabey, D.R., 1974. Application of Surface Geophysics to Ground-Water Investigations, D1. U.S. Geological Survey Techniques of Water Resources Investigations. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.