Does compensation for disruptions stimulate reforms? The case of agrarian reform in Central and Eastern Europe

European Review of Agricultural Economics

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 249-266

  Swinnen, Johan F M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Agrarian reform; Compensation; Institutional design

Indexed keywords

INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK; LAND REFORM; PRIVATISATION; RURAL PLANNING;

EUROPE, (CENTRAL); EUROPE, (EAST);

EID: 0031422890     PISSN: 01651587     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/erae/24.2.249     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Alesina, A. and Perotti, R. (1992). Income Distribution, Political Instability, and Investment. Working Paper, Institute for Policy Reform, Washington DC.
2. Alston, J. M., Edwards, G. W. and Freebairn, J. W. (1988). Market distortions and benefits from research. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 70: 281-288.
3. Ash, T. and Howe, K. (1994). A case for agricultural support in Central and Eastern Europe. Food Policy 18(1): 3-7.
4. Barzel, Y. (1989). Economic Analysis of Property Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. de Gorter, H., Nielson, D. J. and Rausser, G. C. (1992). Productive and predatory public policies: Research expenditures and producer subsidies in agriculture. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 74:27-37.