Disamenity externalities from utility networks

Utilities Policy

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 35-41

  Willis, K G ^a   Garrod, G D ^a  

^a NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Externalities; Network; Utility

Indexed keywords

CANAL SITE; CONTINGENT RANKING; DISAMENITY EXTERNALITY; PUBLIC UTILITY; STRUCTURE NETWORK; WELFARE LOSS;

UK, ENGLAND;

EID: 0031422203     PISSN: 09571787     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0957-1787(96)00013-6     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Adamowicz, W. L., Bhardwaj, V. and Mcnab, B. (1993) Experiments on the difference between willingness to pay and willingness to accept. Land Economics 69(4), 416-427.
2. Arrow, K., Solow, R. Leamer, E. Portney, P. Radner, R. and Schuman, H. (1993) Report of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Panel on Contingent Valuation. Federal Register 58, 4601-4614.
3. Beggs, S., Cardell, S. and Hausman, J. (1981) Assessing the potential demand for electric cars. Journal of Econometrics 16, 1-19.
4. British Waterways (1991) The British Waterways System: Perception and Use of the Inland Waterways. British Waterways Board, Watford.
5. British Waterways (1995) Results of the 1995 Informal Visitor Survey. British Waterways Board, Watford.
6. Gujarati, D. N. (1995) Basic Econometrics. McGraw-Hill, New York.
7. Hanemann, W. M. (1991) Willingness to pay and willingness to accept: How much can they differ? American Economic Review 81, 635-647.
8. Louviere, J. (1996) Relating stated preference measures and models to choices in real markets: calibration of CV responses. In Bjornstad, D. J. and Kahn, J. R. (eds) The Contingent Valuation of Environmental Resources: Methodological Issues and Research Needs. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
9. McFadden, D. (1974) On Conditional Logit Model of Qualitative Choice Behavior, in P. Zarembka (ed.) Frontiers in Econometrics, Academic Press, New York.
10. Mitchell, R. C. and Carson, R. T. (1989) Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: the Contingent Valuation Method. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.
11. Pearce, D. W. and Markandya, A. (1989) The Benefits of Environmental Policies. OECD, Paris.
12. Thomas, T. C., Champ, P. A. Bishop, R. C. and McCollum, D. W. (1996) Which response format reveals the truth about donations to a public good? Land Economics 72(2), 152-166.
13. Willig, R. D. (1976) Consumer's surplus without apology. American Economic Review 66, 587-597.
14. Willis, K. G. and Garrod, G. D. (1991) Valuing open access recreation on inland waterways: on-site recreation surveys and selection effects. Regional Studies 25, 511-524.