Public consumption and unemployment

Scottish Journal of Political Economy

Volumn 44, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 269-279

  Zoega, Gylfi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LABOUR MARKET; PUBLIC CONSUMPTION; THEORY; UNEMPLOYMENT;

EID: 0031420275     PISSN: 00369292     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9485.00057     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. ASCHAUER, D. A. (1985). Fiscal policy and aggregate demand. American Economic Review, 75, pp. 117-127.
2. BAILY, M. J. (1971). National Income and the Price Level. 2nd edition, New York.McGraw-Hill.
3. BARRO, R. J. (1981). Output effects of government purchases. Journal of Political Economy, 89, pp. 1086-121.
4. BARRO, R. J. (1989). The neoclassical approach to fiscal policy. In R. J. Barro (ed.), Modern Business Cycle Theory. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA., pp. 178-235.
5. BAXTER, M. and KING, R. G. (1993). Fiscal policy in general equilibrium, American Economic Review, 83, pp. 315-334.
6. BOWLES, S. (1979). A Marxian theory of unemployment. Lecture at Columbia University, April.
7. CALVO, G. (1979). Quasi-Walrasian models of unemployment. American Economic Review, 69, pp. 102-7.
8. KANAGINIS, G. T. and PHELPS, E. S. (1994). Fiscal policy and economic activity in the neoclassical theory with and without bequests. Finanz Archiv, 51, pp. 137-71.
9. KNOESTER, A. (1984), Negative consequences of public sector expansion in the US and Europe, American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, Washington DC.
10. KNOESTER, A. (1991). The inverted Haavelmo effect and the economic consequences of fiscal policies in the 1970s and 1980s. Research Memorandum 9103, University of Nijmegen.
11. LINDBECK, A. (1985), What is wrong with the West European economies? World Economy, 8, pp. 153-70.
12. LINDBECK, A. (1995). Hazardous welfare-state dynamics. American Economic Review, 85, pp. 9-15.
13. MELTZER, A. H. (1994), Welfare state unemployment Paper prepared for a symposium on 'ReducingUnemployment: Current Issues and Policy Options', sponsored by the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, Jackson Hole, Wyoming, August.
14. PHELPS, E. S. (1990), Pro-Keynesian and Counter-Keynesian implications of the 'Structuralist' theory of unemployment and interest under the classic two-sector view of capital and production. Columbia University Discussion Paper 494.
15. PHELPS, E. S. (1994). Structural Slumps - The Modern Equilibrium Theory of Unemployment, Interest and Assets. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.
16. SCTTOVSKY, T. (1951). Welfare and Competition: The Economics of a Fully Employed Economy, Chicago.
17. SHAPIRO, C. and STIGLITZ, J. (1984). Equilibrium unemployment as a worker discipline device. American Economic Review, 74, pp. 433-44.
18. SNOWER, D. J. (1993). The future of the welfare state. The Economic Journal, 103, pp. 700-17.
19. SNOWER, D. J. (1994). What is the domain of the welfare state?. CEPR Discussion Paper 1018.
20. SOLOW, R. M. (1979). Another source of wage stickiness. Journal of Macroeconomics, 1, pp. 79-82.
21. WINSTON, G. (1965). Taxes, leisure and public goods.Economica, 32, pp. 65-9.