Single versus stereo ERS-1 SAR imagery for planimetric features extraction

International Journal of Remote Sensing

Volumn 18, Issue 18, 1997, Pages 3909-3914

  Toutin, T ^a  

^a CANADA CENTRE FOR REMOTE SENSING   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEATURE EXTRACTION; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; SYNTHETIC APERTURE RADAR;

DIGITAL ELEVATION MODELS; MONOSCOPIC METHOD; STEREOSCOPIC METHOD;

RADAR IMAGING;

ERS-1; FEATURE EXTRACTION; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MONOSCOPIC METHOD; PLANIMETRIC FEATURE; RADAR; SAR; STEREOSCOPIC METHOD;

EID: 0031419235     PISSN: 01431161     EISSN: 13665901     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/014311697216748     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Benis, S. W., Leeds, J. L., and Winer, E. A., 1988, Operator performance as a function of type of display: Conventional versus perspective. Human Factors, 30, 162-169.
2. Koopmans, B. N., 1974, Should stereoscopic SLAR be preferred to single strip imagery for thematic mapping? IT C Journal, 3, 423-444.
3. Toutin, Th., 1995, Multi-source data fusion with an integrated and unified geometric modeling. EARSeL Journal Advances in Remote Sensing, 4, 118-129.
4. Toutin, Th., 1996, Opposite side ERS-1 SAR stereo mapping over rolling topography. I.E.E.E. Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 34, 543-549.
5. Trinder, J. C., 1986, Potential of monocular and stereoscopic observations on aerial photographs. Photogrammetria, 41, 21-27.