Application of an Optimum Design Technique for Determining the Coefficient of Consolidation by Using Piezocone Test Data

Computers and Geotechnics

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 277-293

  Kim, Y S ^a   Lee, S R ^a   Kim, Y T ^a  

^a Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; CLAY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MECHANICAL PERMEABILITY; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS; PORE PRESSURE; POROSITY; PRESSURE EFFECTS;

OPTIMUM DESIGN; PIEZOCONE TESTING;

CONSOLIDATION;

CONSOLDIATION COEFFICIENT; CONSOLIDATED CLAY; CONSOLIDATION COEFFICIENT; OPTIMIZATION; PIEZOCONE TEST;

EID: 0031418415     PISSN: 0266352X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0266-352X(97)00026-8     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Arai, K., Ohta, H. and Kojima, K., Estimation of soil parameters based on monitored movement of subsoil under consolidation. Soils and Foundations, 1984, 24(4), 95-108.
2. Arai, K., Ohta, H. and Yasui, T., Simple optimization techniques for evaluating deformation moduli from field observations. Soils and Foundations, 1983, 23(1), 107-113.
3. Arora, J. S., Introduction of Optimum Design McGraw Hill, New York, 1989.
4. Baligh, M. M. and Levadoux, J. N., Pore pressure dissipation after cone penetration. MIT, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Report R.80-1, Cambridge, MA, 1980.
5. Baligh, M. M., Theory of deep site static cone penetration resistance. MIT, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Report R.75-56 No. 517, Cambridge, MA, 1975.
6. Battaglio, M., Jamiolkowski, M., Lancellotta, R. and Maniscalco, R., Piezometer probe test in cohesive deposits. Proc. Symp. Cone Penetration Testing and Experience, St. Louis, 26-30, Oct. 1981, 264-302.
7. Bruce, G. H., Peacemen, D. W., Rachford, H. H. and Rice, J. D., Calculation of unsteady-state gas flow through porous media. Trans. of American Institute Mining and Met, Engineers, 1953, 198, 79.
8. Carter, J. P., Randolph, M. F., and Wroth, C. P., Stress and pore pressure changes in clay during and after the expansion of a cylindrical cavity. Report No. TR5I (1978), Dept. of Civil Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
9. Cividini, A., Maier, G. and Nappi, A., Parameter estimation of a static geotechnical model using a Bayes' approach. Int. J. Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 1983, 18, 487-503.
10. Douglas, J., Alternating direction methods for three space variables. Numerische mathematik, 1962, 4, 41-63.
11. Gioda, G. and Jurina, L., Numerical identification of soil structure interaction pressures. Int. J. for Numerical Anal. Methods in Geomechanics, 1981, 5, 33-56.
12. Gioda, G., Some remarks on back analysis and characterization problems in geomechanics. Proc. 5th Int. Conf. Numererical Methods in Geomechanics, Nagoya, Vol. 1, 1985, pp. 47-61.
13. Gupta, R. C. and Davidson, J. L., Piezoprobe determination coefficient of consolidation. Soils and Foundations, 1986, 26(3), 12-22.
14. Gupta, R. C., Determination of the in situ coefficient of consolidation and permeability of submerged soil using electrical piezoprobe sounding. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Florida, 1983.
15. Houlsby, G. T. and Teh, C. I., Analysis of the piezocone in clay. Proc. 1st Int. Symposium on Penetration Testing, Vol. 2, Orlando, Florida, 1988, pp. 777-783.
16. Janbu, I. and Senneset, K., Effective stress interpretation of in-situ static penetration tests. Proc. 1st European Symposium on Penetration Testing, Vol. 2.2, Stockholm, Sweden, 1974, pp. 181-195.
17. Kabir, M. G. and Lutenegger, A. J., In situ estimation of the coefficient of consolidation in clays. Can. Geotech. J., 1990, 27, 58-67.
18. Kurup, P. U., Voyiadjis, G. Z. and Tumay, M. T., Calibration chamber studies of piezocone test in cohesive soils. J. Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 1994, 120(1).
19. Levadoux, J. N. and Baligh, M. M., Consolidation after undrained piezocone penetration II: interpretation. J. Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 1986, 112(7).
20. Randolph, M. F., Carter, J. P. and Wroth, C. P., Driven piles in clay (I), installation, modeled as the expansion of a cylindrical cavity. Dept. Civil Engineering, University of Cambridge, Soils/TR 53, 1978.
21. Randolph, M. F., Carter, J. P. and Wroth, C. P., Driven piles in clay - the effect of installation and subsequent consolidation. Geotechnique, 1979, 29(4), 361-393.
22. Robertson, P. K. and Campanella, R. G., Interpretation of cone penetration tests: clay. Can. Geotech. J., 1983, 20, 734-745.
23. Sakurai, S. and Takeuchi, K., Back analysis of measured displacement of tunnels. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 1983, 16, 173-180.
24. c, Proc. 1st European Symposium on Penetration Testing, Vol. 2.2, Stockholm, 1974, 345-351.
25. Sills, G. C., Some conditions under which Biot's equations of consolidation reduce to Terzaghi's equation. Geotechnique, 1975, 25(1), 129-132.
26. Teh, C. I. and Houlsby, G. T., An analytical study of cone penetrometer test in clay. Geotechnique, 1991, 41(1), 17-34.
27. Torstensson, B. A., The pore pressure sounding equipment. ASCE Specialty Conference on In-situ Measurement of Soil Properties, Raleigh, NC, 1975, pp. 48-55.
28. Torstensson B. A., The pore pressure probe. Proceedings Geoteknikkdagen, Tapir Forlag, Olso, 1977.
29. Vesic, A. S., Expansion of cavities in infinite soil mass. J. Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 1972, 98(SM3), 265-290.
30. Kim, Y. T. and Lee, S. R., An equivalent model and back-analysis technique for modeling in situ consolidation behavior of drainage-installed soft deposits. Computers and Geotechnics, 1997, 20(2), 125-142.