Is Pinus sylvestris resistance to pine twist rust associated with fitness costs or benefits?

Evolution

Volumn 51, Issue 6, 1997, Pages 1808-1814

  Andersson, Bengt ^a   Danell, Öje ^b  

^a THE FORESTRY RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF SWEDEN   (Sweden)

^b SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Genetic correlation; Genetic variation; Host pathogen interaction; Melampsora pinitorqua; REML estimates; Scots pine

Indexed keywords

FITNESS; FUNGAL PATHOGEN; GENETIC VARIATION; HEIGHT GROWTH; PINE TWIST RUST; RUST RESISTANCE; SCOTS PINE;

FINLAND; SWEDEN;

ANIMALIA; FUNGI; MELAMPSORA; MELAMPSORA PINITORQUA; PINACEAE; PINUS SYLVESTRIS;

EID: 0031418003     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1997.tb05104.x     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. ANDERSSON, B., AND I. BÄCKSTRÖM. 1993. Plusträdsavkommor i tallfröplantage 10 Östteg. SkogForsk, Avelsvärden no. 14. Uppsala, Sweden. (In Swedish.)
2. ANDERSON, R. M., AND R. M. MAY. 1983. Parasite-host coevolution. Pp. 186-206 in D. J. Futuyma and M. Slatkin, eds. Coevolution. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
3. ENNOS, R. A., AND K. W. SWALES. 1988. Genetic variation in tolerance of host monoterpenes in a population of the ascomycete canker pathogen Crumenulopsis sororia. Plant Pathol. 37:407-416.
4. _. 1991. Genetic variation in a fungal pathogen; response to host defensive chemicals. Evolution 45:190-204.
5. GIANOLA, D., AND H. W. NORTON. 1981. Scaling threshold characters. Genetics 99:357-364.
6. HAGNER, M. 1970a. A genecological investigation of the annual rhythm of Pinus silvestris L. Studia Forestalia Suecica 80, Royal College of Forestry, Stockholm, Sweden.
7. _. 1970b. The intra-provenance correlation between annual rhythm and growth of single trees of Pinus silvestris L. Studia Forestalia Suecica 82, Royal College of Forestry, Stockholm, Sweden.
8. HAMELIN, R. C., R. L. DOUDRICK, AND W. L. NANCE. 1994. Genetic diversity in Cronartium quercuum f. sp. fusiforme on loblolly pines in southern U.S. Curr. Genet. 26:359-363.
9. HARVEY, W. R. 1990. User's guide for LSMLMW and MIXMDL. PC-2 vers. Ohio State Univ., Columbus.
10. HENTER, H. J. 1995. The potential for coevolution in a host-parasitoid system. II. Genetic variation within a population of wasps in the ability to parasitize an aphid host. Evolution 49:439-445.
11. KLINGSTRÖM, A. 1969. Melampsora pinitoorqua (Braun) Rostr. on progenies of Pinus silvestris L. and in relation to growth regulating substances. Studia Forestalia Suecica 69, The Finnish Forest Research Institute, Helsinki.
12. KOSKI, V. 1970. A study of pollen dispersal as a mechanism of gene flow. Communicationes Instituti Forestalias Fenniae 70(4), The Finnish Forest Research Institute, Helsinki.
13. KURKELA, T. 1973. Epiphytology of Melampsora rusts of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and aspen (Populus tremula L.). Communicationes Instituti Forestalias Fenniae 79(4), The Finnish Forest Research Institute, Helsinki.
14. LINDGREN, D., AND R.-P. WEI. 1994. Effects of maternal environment on mortality and growth in young Pinus sylvestris in field trials. Tree Physiol. 14:323-327.
15. LINDGREN, D., L. PAULE, S. XIHUAN, R. YAZDANT, U. SEGERSTRÖM, J.-E. WALLIN, AND M. L. LEJDEBRO. 1995. Can viable pollen carry Scots pine genes over long distances? Grana 34:64-69.
16. MARTINSSON, O. 1980. Testing Scots pine for resistance to pine twist rust. Folia For. (Helsinki) 422:25-31.
17. _. 1985. The influence of pine twist rust (Melampsora pinitorqua) on growth and development of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris). Eur. J. For. Pathol. 15:103-110.
18. _. 1987. Scots pine resistance to pine twist rust-conformity between the resistance found in an artificial environment and field trials. Silvae Genet. 36:15-21.
19. MUONA, O., AND A. HARJU. 1989. Effective population sizes, genetic variability and mating system in natural stands and seed orchards of Pinus sylvestris. Silvae Genet. 38:221-228.
20. NILSSON, J.-E. 1995. Phenological variation among plus-tree clones of Pinus sylvestris (L.) in northern Sweden. Silvae Genet. 44: 20-28.
21. OSKARSSON, O. 1972, Finnish plus trees of Scots pine and Norway spruce. Folia Forestalia 150, The Finnish Forest Research Institute, Helsinki.
22. PARKER, M.A. 1992. Constraints on the evolution of resistance to pests and pathogens. Pp. 181-197 in P. G. Ayres, ed. Pests and pathogens. Plant responses to foliar attack. BIOS Scientific, Oxford.
23. PEASE, C. M. 1984. On the evolutionary reversal of competitive dominance. Evolution 38:1099-1115.
24. SALONIEMI, I. 1993. A coevolutionary predator-prey model with quantitative characters. Am. Nat. 141:880-896.
25. SAS INSTITUTE. 1987. SAS/STAT Guide for personal computers. Vers. 6 ed. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC.
26. SIMMS, E. L. 1992. Costs of plant resistance to herbivory. Pp. 392-425 in R. S. Fritz and E. L. Simms, eds. Plant resistance to herbivores and pathogens: ecology, evolution, and genetics. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.
27. SIMMS, E. L., AND J. TRIPLETT. 1994. Costs and benefits of plant responses to disease: resistance and tolerance. Evolution 48: 1973-1985.