Certification and regulation of forestry practices in the United States: Implications for intensively managed plantations

Biomass and Bioenergy

Volumn 13, Issue 4-5, 1997, Pages 193-199

  Lucier, Alan A ^a   Shepard, James P ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Ecolabel; Environmental; Silviculture; Stewardship; Technology

Indexed keywords

COST EFFECTIVENESS; ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; LAWS AND LEGISLATION; MARKETING; STANDARDS;

ECOLABELING; FOREST MANAGEMENT; SILVICULTURE;

FORESTRY;

CERTIFICATION; ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE; FOREST MANAGEMENT; REGULATORY APPROACH;

USA;

EID: 0031417316     PISSN: 09619534     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0961-9534(97)10008-3     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. American Forest and Paper Association, Sustainable Forestry Principles and Implementation Guidelines. Washington, D.C., 1995.
2. Society of American Foresters Study Group, Forest certification, Journal of Forestry. 1995, 93(4), 6-10.
3. American Forest and Paper Association, Federal Laws and Regulations Affecting Private Forestry. Washington, D.C., 1994.
4. Brown, T. C., Brown, D. and Binkley, D., Laws and programs for controlling nonpoint source pollution in forest areas. Water Resour. Bull., 1993, 29(1), 1-13.
5. Cheng, A. S. and Ellefson, P. V., State Forest Practice Laws and Regulations: A Review of Constitutional and Legal Environments. Staff Paper No. 88, Dept. of Forest Resources. University of Minnesota. St. Paul, MN, 1993.
6. Cubbage, F. W. and Siegle, W. C., The law regulating private forest practices, Journal of Forestry, 1985, 83(9), 538-545.
7. Ellefson, P. V., Forest Resources Policy: Processes, Participants and Programs. McGraw-Hill, Inc. New York, NY. 1992.
8. US Supreme Court, Bruce Babbit, Secretary of the Interior, et al., Petitioners, v. Sweet Home Chapter of Communities for a Greater Oregon, et al., Respondents. No. 94-859. 29 June 1995.
9. US EPA and US Department of the Army, Memorandum to the Field dated 28 November 1995 - 'Application of Best Management Practices to Mechanical Site Preparations Activities for the Establishment of Pine Plantations in the Southeast'. US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds. Washington, D.C., 1995.
10. US EPA, Guidance Specifying Management Measures for Sources of Nonpoint Pollution in Coastal Waters. EPA-840-B-92-002. US Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C., 1993.
11. Powell, D. S., Faulkner, J. L., Darr, D. R., Zhu, Z. and MacCleery, D. W., Forest Resources of the United States, 1992. General Technical Report RM234. USDA Forest Service. Fort Collins, CO, 1993.
12. MacCleery, D. W., American Forests - A History of Resiliency and Recovery. Forest History Society. Durham, NC, 1996.
13. Lucier, A. A., Criteria for success in managing forested landscapes. Journal of Forestry, 1994, 92(7), 20-25.
14. Aust, W. M., Shaffer, R. M. and Burger, J. A., Benefits and costs of forestry best management practices in Virginia, in Benefits and Costs of Programs for Forestry Nonpoint Pollution Control in Washington and Virginia. Technical Bulletin No. 660. National Council for Air and Stream Improvement. Research Triangle Park, NC. pp. 21-45, 1994.
15. American Forest Foundation, Informational brochure on American Tree Farm System. Available from American Forest Foundation, 1111 19th Street. Suite 780, Washington D.C. 20036, U.S.A., 1995.
16. Berg, S. and Olszewski, R., Certification and labeling: a forest industry perspective. Journal of Forestry, 1995, 93(4), 30-32.