When predators also feed on plants: Effects of competition and plant quality on omnivore-prey population dynamics

Annals of the Entomological Society of America

Volumn 90, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 155-161

  Coll, Moshe ^a   Izraylevich, Sergey ^a  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

Asymmetric interference; Intraguild predation; Omnivory; Orius insidiosus; Predator plant interactions; Predator prey interactions

Indexed keywords

ORIUS INSIDIOSUS; ANTHOCORIDAE; HEMIPTERA; THRIPIDAE; THYSANOPTERA;

ASYMMETRIC INTERFERENCE; COMPETITION; INTRAGUILD PREDATION; OMNIVORY; PLANT QUALITY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PREDATOR-PLANT INTERACTION; PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTION;

EID: 0031416748     PISSN: 00138746     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aesa/90.2.155     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Coll, M. 1996a. Living and feeding on plants in predatory Heteroptera. In M. Coll and J. R. Ruberson [eds.], Predatory Heteroptera in agroecosystems: their ecology and use in biological control. Proceedings, Thomas Say Symposium, Entomological Society of America, Lanham, MD (in press).
2. 1996b. Feeding and ovipositing on plants by an omnivorous insect predator. Oecologia (Berl.)105: 214-220.
3. Coll, M., and R. L. Ridgway. 1995. Functional and numerical responses of Orius insidiosus (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae) to its prey in different vegetable crops. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 88: 732-738.
4. Coll, M., L. A. Smith, and R. L. Ridgway. 1997. Effect of plants on the searching efficiency of a generalist predator: the importance of predator-prey spatial association. Entomol. Exp. Appl. (in press).
5. Diehl, S. 1993. Relative consumer sizes and the strengths of direct and indirect interactions in omnivorous feeding relationships. Oikos 68: 151-157.
6. Hastings, A., C. L. Horn, S. Ellner, P. Turchin, and H.C.J. Godfrey. 1993. Chaos in ecology: is mother nature a strange attractor? Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 24: 1-33.
7. Milliken, G. A., and D. E. Johnson. 1984. Analysis of messy data, vol. 1. Designed experiments. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
8. Naranjo, S. E., and R. L. Gibson. 1996. Phytophagy in predaceous Heteroptera: effects on life history and population dynamics. In R. N. Wiedenmann and O. Alomar [eds.], Zoophytophagous Heteroptera: implications for life history and IPM. Proceedings, Thomas Say Symposium, Entomological Society of America, Lanham, MD (in press).
9. Pimm, S. L., and J. H. Lawton. 1978. On feeding on more than one trophic level. Nature (Lond.) 275: 542-544.
10. Polis, G. A., and R. D. Holt. 1992. Intraguild predation: the dynamics of complex trophic interactions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 7: 151-154.
11. Polis, G. A., C. A. Myers, and R. D. Holt. 1989. The ecology and evolution of intraguild predation: potential competitors that eat each other. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 20: 297-330.
12. SAS Institute. 1988. SAS/STAT user's guide, release 6.03 ed. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
13. Slansky, F. Jr., and J. M. Scriber. 1985. Food consumption and utilization, pp. 87-163. In G. A. Kerkut and L. I. Gilbert [eds.], Comprehensive insect physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology, vol. 4. Regulation: digestion, nutrition, secretion. Pergamon, Oxford.
14. Stamp, N. E., and M. D. Bowers. 1991. Indirect effect on survivorship of caterpillars due to presence of invertebrate predators. Oecologia (Berl.) 88: 325-330.
15. 1993. Presence of predatory wasps and srinkbugs alters foraging behavior of cryptic and non-cryptic caterpillars on plantain (Plantago lanceolata). Oecologia (Berl.) 95: 376-384.