Intranucleus accumbens amphetamine infusions enhance responding maintained by a stimulus complex paired with oral ethanol self-administration

Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior

Volumn 58, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 1065-1073

  Slawecki, Craig J ^a   Samson, Herman H ^a   Chappell, Ann ^a  

^a WAKE FOREST SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Amphetamine; Conditioned reinforcement; Ethanol self administration; New response; Nucleus accumbens

Indexed keywords

AMPHETAMINE;

ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CONDITIONING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOPAMINE BRAIN LEVEL; DOPAMINERGIC ACTIVITY; DRUG SELF ADMINISTRATION; INTRACEREBROVENTRICULAR DRUG ADMINISTRATION; MALE; NONHUMAN; NUCLEUS ACCUMBENS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; REINFORCEMENT;

ANIMALS; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM DEPRESSANTS; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM STIMULANTS; CONDITIONING, OPERANT; DEXTROAMPHETAMINE; ETHANOL; MALE; MICROINJECTIONS; NUCLEUS ACCUMBENS; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; REINFORCEMENT SCHEDULE; SELF ADMINISTRATION;

EID: 0031415289     PISSN: 00913057     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0091-3057(97)00310-9     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Beardsley P. M., Lemaire G. A., Meisch R. A. Persistence of ethanol self-administration as a function of inter-reinforcer interval and concentration. Drug Alcohol Depend. 34:1993;71-81.
2. Beninger R. J., Phillips A. G. The effect of pimozide on the establishment of conditioned reinforcement. Psychopharmacology (Berlin). 68:1980;147-153.
3. Benninger R. J., Rolfe N. G. Dopamine D1-like receptor agonists impair responding for conditioned reward in rats. Behav. Pharmacol. 6:1995;785-793.
4. Brink N. G., Bonnichsen R. A modified method for the enzymatic microdetermination of ethanol. Acta Pharmacol. Toxicol. 10:1954;223-226.
5. Brown V. J., Latimer M. P., Winn P. Memory for changing cost of a reward is mediated by the sublenticular extended amygdala. Brain Res. Bull. 39:1996;163-170.
6. Brudzynski S. M., Mogenson G. J. Association of the mesencephalic locomotor region with locomotor activity induced by injections of amphetamine into the nucleus accumbens. Brain Res. 334:1985;77-84.
7. Burns L. H., Robbins T.W., Everitt B. J. Differential effects of excitotoxic lesions of the basolateral amygdala, ventral subiculum, and medial prefrontal cortex on responding with conditioned reinforcement and locomotor activity potentiated by intra-accumbens infusions of d-amphetamine. Behav. Brain Res. 55:1993;167-183.
8. Burns L. H., Annett L., Kelley A. E., Everitt B. J., Robbins T. W. Effects of lesions to amygdala, ventral subiculum, medial prefrontal cortex, and nucleus accumbens on reaction to novelty. Implication for limbic-striatal interactions Behav. Neurosci. 119:1996;60-73.
9. Cador M., Taylor J. R., Robbins T. W. Potentiation of reward-related stimuli by dopaminergic-dependent mechanisms in the nucleus accumbens. Psychopharmacology (Berlin). 104:1991;377-385.
10. Carr G. D., White N. M. Effects of systemic and intracranial amphetamine injections on behavior in the open field. A detailed analysis Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 27:1987;113-122.
11. Carroll M. E., Meisch R. A. Determinants of increased drug self-administration due to food deprivation. Psychopharmacology (Berlin). 74:1981;197-200.
12. Cunningham C. L. Flavor and location aversions produced by ethanol. Behav. Neurol Biol. 27:1979;362-367.
13. Cunningham C. L. Modulation of ethanol reinforcement by conditioned hyperthermia. Psychopharmacology (Berlin). 115:1994;79-85.
14. De La Garza R., Johanson C. E. The effects of food deprivation on the self-administration of psychoactive drugs. Drug Alcohol Depend. 19:1987;17-27.
15. Essman W. D., McGonigle P., Lucki I. Anatomical differentiation within the nucleus accumbens of the locomotor stimulatory actions of selective dopamine agonists and d-amphetamine. Psychopharmacology (Berlin). 112:1993;233-241.
16. Files F. J., Branch M. N., Clody D. Effects of methylphenidate on responding under extinction in the presence and absence of conditioned reinforcement. Behav. Pharmacol. 1:1989;113-121.
17. Garcia J., Kimeldorf D. J., Koelling R. A. Conditioned aversion to saccharin resulting from exposure to gamma radiation. 1955;157-158, Science XX.
18. Garcia J., McGowan B. K., Ervin F. R., Koelling R. A. Cues. Their relative effectiveness as a function of the reinforcer Science. 160:1968;794-795.
19. Glautier S., Drummond C., Remington B. Alcohol as an unconditioned stimulus in human classical conditioning. Psychopharmacology (Berlin). 116:1994;360-368.
20. Grant K. A., Samson H. H. Induction and maintenance of ethanol self-administration without food deprivation in the rat. Psychopharmacology (Berlin). 86:1985;475-479.
21. Grant K. A. Animal models of the alcohol addiction process. Kranzler H. R. Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology. vol. 114. 1995;185-229 Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
22. Greeley J. D., Swift W., Heather N. To drink or not to drink? Assessing conflicting desires in dependent drinkers in treatment. Drug Alcohol Depend. 32:1993;168-179.
23. Groenewegen H. J., Berendse H. W., Haber S. N. Organization of the output of the ventral striatopallidal system in the rat. Ventral pallidal efferents Neuroscience. 57:1993;113-142.
24. Hill R.T. Facilitation of conditioned reinforcement as a mechanism for psychomotor stimulation. Costa E., Garattini S. Amphetamines and related compounds. 1970;781-795 Raven Press, New York.
25. Hodge C. W., Samson H. H., Haraguchi M. Microinjections of dopamine agonists in the nucleus accumbens increase ethanol-reinforced responding. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 42:1992;249-254.
26. Hoebel B. G. Brain neurotransmitters in food and drug reward. Am. J. Clin. Nutri. 42:1985;1133-1150.
27. Hoffman D. C., Beninger R. J. The effects of pimozide on the establishment of conditioned reinforcement as a function of the amount of conditioning. Psychopharmacology (Berlin). 87:1985;454-460.
28. Holder M. D., Bermudez-Rattoni F., Garcia J. Taste-potentiated noise-illness associations. Behav. Neurosci. 102:1988;363-370.
29. Ikemoto S., Panksepp J. Dissociations between appetitive and consummatory responses by pharmacological manipulations of reward-relevant brain regions. Behav. Neurosci. 110:1996;331-345.
30. Kelley A. E., Delfs J. M. Dopamine and conditioned reinforcement. Psychopharmacology (Berlin). 103:1991;187-196.
31. Kelley A. E., Delfs M. M. Dopamine and conditioned reinforcement. II. Contrasting effects of amphetamine microinjection into the nucleus accumbens with peptide microinjection into the ventral tegmental area. Psychopharmacology (Berlin). 103:1991;197-203.
32. Krank M. D. Environmental signals for ethanol enhance free-choice ethanol consumption. Behav. Neurosci. 103:1989;365-372.
33. Laberg J. C., Ellertsen B. Psychophysiological indicators of craving in alcoholics. Effects of cue exposure Br. J. Addict. 82:1987;1341-1348.
34. Laberg J. C. What is presented, and what is prevented, in cue exposure and response prevention with alcohol dependent subjects. Addict. Behav. 15:1990;367-396.
35. Li T. K., Lumeng L., McBride W. J., Waller M. D. Indiana selection studies on alcohol-related behavior. McClearn G. E., Deitrich R. A., Erwin V. G. NIAAA Research Monograph 6. Development of animal models as pharmacogenetic tools, vol. 6:1981;171-191 US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
36. Mark G. P., Smith S. E., Rada P. V., Hoebel B. G. An appetitively conditioned taste elicits a preferential increase in mesolimbic dopamine release. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 48:1994;651-660.
37. Marurski E. J., Benninger R. J. The effects of (+)-amphetamine and apomorphine on responding for a conditioned reinforcer, Psychopharmacology (Berlin). 90:1986;239-243.
38. Mogenson G. J., Yim C. C. Neuromodulatory function of the mesolimbic dopamine system. Electrophysiological and behavioral studies Willner P., Scheel-Kruger J. The mesolimbic dopamine system. From motivation to action:1991;105-130 John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK.
39. Molina J. C., Chotro M. G. Acute alcohol intoxication paired with aversive reinforcement. Ethanol odor as a conditioned reinforcer in rat pups Behav. Neural Biol. 52:1989;1-19.
40. Monti P. M., Binkoff J. A., Abrams D. B., Zwick W. R., Nirenberg T. C., Liepman M. R. Reactivity of alcoholics and nonalcoholics to drinking cues. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 96:1987;122-126.
41. Paxinos W., Watson C. The rat brain in stereotaxic coordinates. 2:1986;Academic Press, Orlando.
42. Pennartz C. M. A., Groenewegen H. J., Lopes da Silva F. H. The nucleus accumbens as a complex of functionally distinct neuronal ensembles. An integration of behavioural electrophysiological and anatomical data Prog. Neurobiol. 42:1994;719-761.
43. Phillips G. D., Robbins T. W., Everitt B. J. Mesoaccumbens dopamine-opiate interactions in the control over behaviour by a conditioned reinforcer. Psychopharmacology (Berlin). 114:1994;345-359.
44. Pulvirenti L., Koob G. F. The neural substrates of drug addiction and dependence. Funct. Neurol. 5:1990;109-119.
45. Ranaldi R., Beninger R. J. Dopamine D1 and D2 antagonists attenuate amphetamine-produced enhancement of responding for conditioned reward in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berlin). 113:1993;110-118.
46. Ranaldi R., Pantalony D., Beninger R. J. The D1 agonist SKF 38393 attenuates amphetamine-produced enhancement of responding for conditioned reinforcement. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 52:1995;131-137.
47. Robbins T. W., Koob G. F. Pipradrol enhances reinforcing properties of stimuli paired with brain stimulation. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 8:1978;219-222.
48. Robbins T. W., Cador M., Taylor J. R., Everitt B. J. Limbic-striatal interactions in reward-related processes. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 13:1989;155-162.
49. Salamone J. D. The involvement of nucleus accumbens dopamine in appetitive and aversive motivation. Behav. Brain Res. 61:1994;117-133.
50. Salamone J. D., Cousins M. S., McCullough L. D., Carriero D. L., Berkowitz R. J. Nucleus accumbens dopamine release increases during instrumental lever pressing for food but not free food consumption. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 49:1994;25-31.
51. Samson H. H. Initiation of ethanol reinforcement using a sucrose-substitution procedure in food- and water-sated rats. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 10:1986;436-442.
52. Samson H. H., Hodge C. W., Tolliver G. A., Haraguchi M. Effect of dopamine agonists and antagonists on ethanol-reinforced behavior. The involvement of the nucleus accumbens Brain Res. Bull. 30:1993;133-141.
53. Samson H. H., Hodge C. W. Neurobehavioral regulation of ethanol intake. Deitrich R. A., Erwin V. G. Pharmacological effects of ethanol on the nervous system. 1996;203-226 CRC Press, New York.
54. Schaal D. W., Branch M. N. Changes due to food deprivation in the effects of cocaine on the responding of pigeons. Behav. Pharmacol. 3:1992;5-9.
55. Schwarting R., Carey R. J. Deficits in inhibitory avoidance after neurotoxic lesions of the ventral striatum are neurochemically and behaviorally selective. Behav. Brain Res. 18:1985;279-283.
56. Smith S. G., Werner T. E., Davis W. M. Alcohol-associated conditioned reinforcement. Psychopharmacology (Berlin). 53:1977;223-226.
57. Staiger P. K., White J. M. Cue reactivity in alcohol abusers. Stimulus specificity and extinction of the responses Addict. Behav. 16:1991;211-221.
58. Taghzouti K., Simon H., Louilot A., Herman J. P., Le Moal M. Behavioral study after local injection of 6-hydroxydopamine into the nucleus accumbens in the rat. Brain Res. 344:1985;9-20.
59. Taylor J. R., Robbins T. W. Enhanced behavioral control by conditioned reinforcers following microinjections of d-amphetamine into the nucleus accumbens. Psychopharmacology (Berlin). 84:1984;405-412.
60. Taylor J. R., Robbins T. W. 6-Hydroxydopamine lesions of the nucleus accumbens, but not the caudate nucleus, attenuate enhanced responding with reward-related stimuli produced by intra-accumbens d-amphetamine. Psychopharmacology (Berlin). 90:1986;390-397.
61. Turkkan J. S., McCaul M. E., Stitzer M. L. Psychophysiological effects of alcohol-related stimuli. II Enhancement with alcohol availability. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 13:1989;392-398.
62. van den Bos R., Cools A. R. The involvement of the nucleus accumbens in the ability of rats to switch to cue directed behavior. Life Sci. 44:1989;1697-1704.
63. Wan F. J., Geyer M. A., Swerdlow N. R. Presynaptic dopamine-glutamate interactions in the nucleus accumbens regulate sensorimotor gating. Psychopharmacology (Berlin). 120:1995;433-441.
64. Whishaw I. Q., Kornelsen R. A. Two types of motivation revealed by ibotenic acid nucleus accumbens lesions. Dissociation of food carrying and hoarding and the role of primary and incentive motivation Behav. Brain Res. 55:1993;283-295.
65. Wikler A. Some implications of conditioning theory for problems of drug abuse. Behav. Sci. 16:1971;92-97.
66. Wolterink G., Phillips G., Cador M., Donselaar-Wolterink I., Robbins T. W., Everitt B. J. Relative roles of ventral striatal D1 and D2 dopamine receptors in responding with conditioned reinforcement. Psychopharmacology (Berlin). 110:1993;355-364.
67. Zacny J. P., Lichtor L., Flemming D., Coalson D. W., Thompson W. K. A dose-response analysis of the subjective, psychomotor and physiological effects of intravenous morphine in healthy volunteers. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 268:1994;1-9.
68. Zahm D. S., Brog J. S. On the significance of subterritories in the "Accumbens" part of the rat ventral striatum. Neuroscience. 50:1992;751-767.