On the neutrality of inside and outside money

Economica

Volumn 64, Issue 256, 1997, Pages 567-586

  Jefferson, Philip N ^a  

^a FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC ACTIVITY; NATIONAL ECONOMY; THEORY;

USA;

EID: 0031411121     PISSN: 00130427     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1468-0335.00100     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. BLANCHARD, O. J. and QUAH, D. (1989). The dynamic effects of aggregate demand and supply disturbances. American Economic Review, 79, 655-73.
2. BLOUGU, S. R. (1992). The relationship between power and level for generic unit root tests in finite samples. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 7, 295-308.
3. BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM (1976). Banking and Monetary Statistics, 1941-70, Washington, DC.
4. BOSCHEN, J. F. and OTROK, C. M. (1994). Long-run neutrality and superneutrality in an ARIMA framework: comment. American Economic Review, 84, 1470-73.
5. CAGAN, P. (1965). Determinants and Effects of Changes in the Stock of Money, 1875-1960. New York: Columbia University Press.
6. _ (1993). Does endogeneity of the money supply disprove monetary effects on economic activity? Journal of Macroeconomics, 15, 409-22.
7. CAMPBELL, J. Y. and PERRON, P. (1991). Pitfalls and opportunities: what macroeconomists should know about unit roots. In O. J. Blanchard and S. Fischer (eds.), NBER Macroeconomics Annual. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, pp. 141-200.
8. CHARI, V. V., CHRISTIANO, L. J. and EICHENBAUM, M. (1994). Inside money, outside money, and short term interest rates. Working Paper, Northwestern University.
9. COCHRANE, J. H. (1991). A critique of the application of unit root tests. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 15, 279-85.
10. FISHER, M. E. and SEATER, J. J. (1993). Long-run neutrality and superneutrality in an ARIMA framework. American Economic Review, 83, 402-15.
11. FRIEDMAN, M. and SCHWARTZ, A. (1963). A Monetary History of the United States, 1867-1960. Princeton University Press.
12. _ and _ (1970). Monetary Statistics of the United Slates: Estimates, Sources, Methods. New York: Columbia University Press.
13. _ and _ (1982). Monetary Trends in the United States and the United Kingdom: Their Relation to Income, Prices, and Interest Rates, 1867-1975. University of Chicago Press.
14. GALI, J. (1992). How well does the IS-LM model fit postwar US data? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107, 709-38.
15. GURLEY, J. G. and SHAW, E. S. (1960). Money in a Theory of Finance. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
16. HARTLEY, P. R. and WALSH, C. E. (1991). Inside money and monetary neutrality. Journal of Macroeconomics, 13, 395-416.
17. IRELAND, P. N. (1994). Money and growth: an alternative approach. American Economic Review, 84, 47-67.
18. KING, R. G. and PLOSSER, C. (1984). Money, credit, and prices in a real business cycle. American Economic Review, 74, 373-80.
19. _ and WATSON, M. W. (1992). Testing long run neutrality. NBER Working Paper no. 4156.
20. LACKER, J. M. (1990). Inside money and real output: a reinterpretation. Journal of Macroeconomics, 12, 65-79.
21. MACKINNON, J. (1991). Critical values for cointegration tests. In R. F. Engle and C. W. J. Granger (eds.), Long-Run Economic Relationships: Readings in Cointegration. Oxford University Press, pp. 267-76.
22. MARQUIS, M. H. and REFFETT, K. L. (1992). Capital in the payments system. Economica, 59, 351-64.
23. PATINKIN, D. (1965). Money, Interest, and Prices, 2nd edn. New York: Harper & Row.
24. RÖMER, C. D. (1989). The prewar business cycle reconsidered: new estimates of gross national product, 1869-1908. Journal of Political Economy, 97, 1-37.
25. SHAPIRO, M. and WATSON, M. W. (1988). Sources of business cycle fluctuations. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, Vol. 3. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, pp. 111-56.
26. US DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE (1975). Historical Statistics of the United Stales: Colonial Times to 1970. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.