Analysis of short time-space range seismicity patterns in Italy

Annali di Geofisica

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 783-797

  Di Luccio, Francesca ^a   Console, Rodolfo ^a   Imoto, Masajiro ^b   Murru, Maura ^a  

^a ISTITUTO NAZIONALE DI GEOFISICA E VULCANOLOGIA   (Italy)

^b NATIONAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR EARTH SCIENCE AND DISASTER PREVENTION   (Japan)

Author keywords

Aftershocks; Conditional probability; Foreshocks; Probability gain

Indexed keywords

EARTHQUAKE PROBABILITY; SEISMICITY;

ITALY;

EID: 0031410775     PISSN: 03652556     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. AGNEW, D.C. and L.M. JONES (1991): Prediction probabilities for foreshocks, J. Geophys. Res., 96, 11959-11971.
2. AKAIKE, H. (1974): A new look at the statistical model identification, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, AC-19, 716-722.
3. AKI, K. (1981): A probabilistic synthesis of precursory phenomena, in Earthquake Prediction, an International Review, Maurice Ewing Series 4, edited by D.W. SIMPSON and P.G. RICHARDS, Am. Geophys. Union, Washington, D.C., 566-574.
4. CONSOLE, R. and M. MURRU (1996): Probability gain due to foreshocks following quiescences tested by synthetic catalogs, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 86 (3), 911-913.
5. CONSOLE, R., M. MURRU and B. ALESSANDRINI (1992): Foreshock statistic in the Italian seismicity, in Proceedings of the XXIII General Assembly of the European Seismological Commission, Prague, Czechoslovakia, 7-12 September 1992, 1, 126-130.
6. CONSOLE, R., M. MURRU and B. ALESSANDRINI (1993): Foreshock statistics and their possible relationship to earthquake prediction in the Italian region, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 83, 1248-1263.
7. IMOTO, M. (1993): Foreshock occurrence in Kanto, Central Japan, and its performance as a precursor, in Proceedings of Conference LXII, Eigth Joint Meeting of the U.S. - Japan Conference on Natural Resources (UJNR), USGS open-file No. 93-542. Menlo Park, California, 16-21 November 1992, 199-213.
8. JONES, L.M. (1984): Foreshocks (1966-1980) in the San Andreas system, California, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 74, 1361-1380.
9. JONES, L.M. (1985): Foreshocks and time-dependent earthquake assessment in Southern California, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 75, 1669-1680.
10. JONES, L.M., R. CONSOLE, F. DI LUCCIO and M. MURRU (1997): Are foreshocks mainshocks whose aftershocks happen to be big? Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. (submitted).
11. MAEDA, K. (1996): The use of foreshock in probabilistic prediction along the Japan and Kuril trenches, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 86 (in press).
12. OGATA, Y., T. UTSU and K. KATSURA (1995): Statistical features of foreshocks in comparison with other earthquake clusters, Geophys. J. Int., 121, 233-254.
13. OGATA, Y., T. UTSU and K. KATSURA (1996): Statistical discrimination of foreshocks from other earthquake clusters, Geophys. J. Int., 127, 17-30.
14. REASENBERG, P.M. and L.M. JONES (1989): Earthquake hazard after a mainshock in California, Science, 243, 1173-1176.
15. REASENBERG, P.M. and M. V. MATTHEWS (1988): Precursory seismic quiescence: a Preliminary Assessment of the Hypothesis, Pageoph, 126, 373-406.
16. SAKAMOTO, Y., M. ISHIGURO and G. KITAGAWA (1983): Akaike information criterion statistics (D. Reidel, Dordrecht), pp. 290.