Avoidance of cyanide guns by black-backed jackal

Applied Animal Behaviour Science

Volumn 55, Issue 1-2, 1997, Pages 177-182

  Brand, D J ^a   Nel, J A J ^b  

^a N Cape Prov Nat Conserv Service   (South Africa)

^b STELLENBOSCH UNIVERSITY   (South Africa)

Author keywords

Avoidance behavior; Black backed jackal; Cyanide guns

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031408888     PISSN: 01681591     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0168-1591(97)00042-7     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Beasom, S.L., Gober, D.R., 1977. The efficacy of the M-44 as a tool to curtail sheep losses to predation. Unpublished report, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
2. Bigalke, R.C., Rowe-Rowe, D.T., 1969. An analysis of the results of hunting black-backed jackals over a five-year period in Natal. Lammergeyer 10, 70-80.
3. Burns, R.J., Connolly, G.E., 1980. Lithium chloride bait aversion did not influence prey killing in coyotes. Proc. Vertebr. Pest Conf. 9, 200-204.
4. Conover, W.J., 1980. Practical Nonparametric Statistics, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York.
5. Ellins, S.R., Thompson, L., Swanson, W.E., 1983. Effects of novelty and familiarity on illness-induced aversions to food and place cues in coyotes (Canis latrans). J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 97, 302-309.
6. Fox, M.W., Bekoff, M., 1975. The behavior of dogs. In: Hafez, E.S.E. (Ed.), The Behavior of Domestic Animals, 3rd edn. Bailliére Tindall, London.
7. Garcia, J., Rusiniak, K.W., Brett, L.P., 1977. Operant-pavlovian interactions. In: Davis, H., Hurwitz, H.M.B. (Eds.), Conditioning Food - Illness Aversions in Wild Animals: Caveant Canonici. Wiley, London.
8. Gustavson, C.R., 1974. Taste aversion conditioning as a predator control method in the coyote and ferret. Ph.D. thesis, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
9. Gustavson, C.R., Garcia, J., Hankins, W.G., Rusiniak, K.W., 1974. Coyote predation control by aversive conditioning. Science 184, 581-583.
10. Hinde, R.A., 1970. Animal Behavior: a Synthesis of Ethology and Comparative Psychology, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York.
11. Johnson, W.E., Balph, D.F., 1990. Resource acquisition in the presence of novelty by coyotes of different rank. J. Wildl. Manage. 54, 582-586.
12. Lehner, P.N., Krumm, R., Cringan, A.T., 1976. Tests for olfactory repellants for coyotes and dogs. J. Wildl. Manage. 40, 145-150.
13. Mahut, H., 1958. Breed differences in the dog's emotional behavior. Can. J. Psychol. 12, 35-44.
14. Manning, A., 1979. An introduction to animal behavior. Edward Arnold, London.
15. Olsen, A., Lehner, P.N., 1978. Conditioned avoidance of prey in coyotes. J. Wildl. Manage. 42, 676-679.
16. Siegel, S., 1956. Non-parametric Statistics for Behavioral Sciences. McGraw-Hill, New York.
17. van der Merwe, N.J., 1953. The jackal. Fauna and Flora 4, 1-83.
18. Wells, M.C., Lehner, P.N., 1978. The relative importance of the distance senses in coyote predatory behavior. Anim. Behavior 26, 251-258.
19. Whiten, A., Ham, R., 1992. On the nature and evolution of imitation in the animal kingdom: reappraissal of a century of research. Adv. Study Behavior 21, 239-283.