Evaluating the contribution of Small National Park areas to regional biodiversity

Natural Areas Journal

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 324-330

  Falkner, Maurya B ^a   Stohlgren, Thomas J ^a  

^a Immunology and Pathology   (United States)

Author keywords

Jaccard's Coefficient; National Park System units; Species density; Species richness; Species area curves

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; BIODIVERSITY COSNERVATION; CONSERVATION; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; NATIONAL PARK; PROTECTED AREA; RSSRVE DESIGN; SPECIES-AREA CURVE;

USA, ROCKY MOUNTAINS;

EID: 0031405847     PISSN: 08858608     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Barbour, M.G., J.H. Burk, and W.D. Pitts. 1987. Terrestrial Plant Ecology. The Benjamin/ Cummings Publishing Company, Menlo Park, Calif.
2. Gleason, H.A. 1922. On the relation of species and area. Ecology 3:158-162.
3. Gleason, H.A. 1925. Species and area. Ecology 6:66-74.
4. Hales, D. 1989. Changing concepts of national parks. Pp. 139-144 in D. Western and M. Pearl, eds., Conservation for the TwentyFirst Century. Oxford University Press, New York.
5. The Keystone Center. 1991. Final consensus report of the Keystone policy dialogue on biodiversity on federal lands. The Keystone Center, Keystone, Colo.
6. Krebs, C.J. 1989. Ecological Methodology. Harper and Row, New York.
7. Magurran, A.E. 1988. Ecological Diversity and its Measurement. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.
8. Newmark, W.D. 1995. Extinction of mammal populations in Western North American National Parks. Conservation Biology 9:512-526.
9. Noss, R.F. and A.Y. Cooperrider. 1994. Saving Nature's Legacy: Protecting and Restoring Biodiversity. Island Press, Washington, D.C.
10. Preston, F.W. 1960. Time and space and the variation of species. Ecology 41:611-627.
11. Preston, F.W. 1962. The canonical distribution of commonness and rarity. Ecology 43:185-215, 410-432.
12. Preston, F.W, 1969. Diversity and stability in the biological world. Brookhaven Symposium in Biology 22:1-12.
13. Quinn, J.F, and S.P. Harrison. 1988. Effects of fragmentation and isolation on species richness: Evidence from biogeographic patterns. Oecologia 75:132-140.
14. Quinn, J.F. and C. van Riper III. 1990. Design considerations for national park inventories. Pp. 5-13 in C. van Riper III, T.J. Stohlgren, S.D. Veirs, Jr., and S.C. Hillyer, eds., Examples of Resources Inventory and Monitoring in National Parks of California. Proceedings of the Third Biennial Conference, NPS Transactions and Proceedings Series No. 8, Washington, D.C.
15. Shafer, C.L. 1995. Values and shortcomings of small reserves. BioScience 45:80-88.
16. Soulé, M.E. and D. Simberloff. 1986. What do genetics and ecology tell us about the design of nature reserves? Biological Conservation 35:19-40.
17. Stohlgren, T.J. and J.F. Quinn. 1991. Status of natural resources databases in national parks, Technical Report No. 44, Western Region, Cooperative Parks Study Unit, University of California, Davis.
18. Stohlgren, T.J. and J.F. Quinn. 1992. An assessment of biotic inventories in Western U.S. National Parks, Natural Areas Journal 12:145-154.
19. Stohlgren, T.J., J.F. Quinn, M. Ruggiero, and G. Waggoner. 1995a. Status of biotic inventories in U.S. National Parks. Biological Conservation 71:97-106.
20. Stohlgren, T.J., J. Baron, T.G.F. Kittel, and D. Binkley. 1995b. Ecosystem trends in the Colorado Rockies. Pp. 207-209 in Our Living Resources, 1995: A Report to the Nation on the Distribution, Abundance, and Health of U.S. Plants, Animals, and Ecosystems. National Biological Service, Washington, D.C.
21. U.S. National Park Service. 1984. Statement for management: Grant-Kohrs Ranch National Historic Site. U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Office of Public Affairs and the Division of Publications.
22. _. 1987a. Endangered species in the national parks. U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Washington, D.C.
23. _. 1987b. Statement for management: Fort Laramie National Historic Site. U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Washington, D.C.
24. _. 1991. The National Parks: Index 1991. U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Office of Public Affairs and the Division of Publications, Washington, D.C.
25. U.S. Office of Technology Assessment. 1993. Preserves: Federally protected natural areas. Pp. 219-297 in Preparing for an Uncertain Climate, Vol. 2. OTA-O-568, U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, Washington, D.C.
26. Williams, C.B. 1964. The logarithmic series and the comparison of island floras. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of London 158:104-108.
27. Wilson, E.O. 1988. The current state of biodiversity. Pp. 3-18 in E.O. Wilson and F.M. Peter, eds., Biodiversity. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
28. Wright, R.G., J.G. MacCracken, and J. Hall. 1994. An ecological evaluation of proposed new conservation areas in Idaho: Evaluating proposed Idaho national parks. Conservation Biology 8:207-216.
29. Zar, J.H. 1974. Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.