Influence of leaf type and plant age on leaf structure and sclerophylly in Hakea (Proteaceae)

Australian Journal of Botany

Volumn 45, Issue 5, 1997, Pages 827-838

  Groom, Philip K ^a,b   Lamont, Byron B ^a   Markey, Adrienne S ^a,c  

^a CURTIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b EDITH COWAN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c Wildlife Research Centre   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HAKEA;

EID: 0031405422     PISSN: 00671924     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1071/BT96115     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Boughton, V. H. (1986). Phyllode structure, taxonomy and distribution in some Australian acacias. Australian Journal of Botany 34, 663-674.
2. Brodribb, T., and Hill, R. S. (1993). A physiological comparison of leaves and phyllodes in Acacia melanoxylon. Australian Journal of Botany 41, 293-305.
3. Carlquist, S. (1974). 'Island Biology.' (Columbia University Press: New York.)
4. Catling, D. M., and Gates, P. J. (1995). Leaf anatomy in Hakea Schrader (Proteaceae). Botanishe Jahrbücher für Systematik 117, 153-172.
5. Chabot, B. F., and Hicks, D. J. (1982). The ecology of leaf life spans. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 13, 229-259.
6. Feder, N., and O'Brien, T. P. (1968). Plant microtechnique: some principles and new methods. American Journal of Botany 55, 123-142.
7. Goebel, K. (1900). 'Organography of Plants. I. General Organography.' English translation by I. B. Balfour. (Hafner Publishing: New York.)
8. Gould, K. S. (1993). Leaf heteroblasty in Pseudopanax crassifolius: functional significance of leaf morphology and anatomy. Annals of Botany 71, 61-70.
9. Groom, P. K., and Lamont, B. B. (1996). Ecogeographical analysis of Hakea (Proteaceae) in southwestern Australia with special reference to leaf morphology and life form. Australian Journal of Botany 44, 527-542.
10. Groom, P. K., Lamont, B. B., and Kupsky, L. (1994). Contrasting morphology and ecophysiology of co-occurring broad and terete leaves in Hakea trifurcata (Proteaceae). Australian Journal of Botany 42, 307-320.
11. Hamilton, A. G. (1927). The xerophytic structure of the leaf in the Australian Proteaceae. Part i. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales 52, 258-274.
12. Hansen, D. H. (1986). Water relations of compound leaves and phyllodes in Acacia koa var. latifolia. Plant, Cell and Environment 9, 439-445.
13. Hansen, D., and Steig, E. (1993). Comparison of water-use efficiency and internal leaf carbon concentration in juvenile leaves and phyllodes of Acacia koa (Leguminosae) from Hawaii, estimated by two methods. American Journal of Botany 80, 1121-1125.
14. Heide-Jørgensen, H. S. (1990). Xeromorphic leaves of Hakea suaveolens R.Br. IV. Ontogeny, structure and function of the sclereids. Australian Journal of Botany 38, 25-43.
15. Kummerow, J. (1973). Comparative anatomy of sclerophylls of mediterranean climate areas. In 'Mediterranean-type Ecosystems. Origin and Structure'. (Eds F. di Castri and H. A. Mooney.) pp. 157-167. (Springer-Verlag: Berlin.)
16. Lee, H. M. (1987). The biology of Hakea epiglottis Labill. (Proteaceae). Australian Journal of Botany 35, 689-699.
17. Mooney, H. A., Kummerow, J., Moll, E. J., Orshan, G., Rutherford, M. C., and Sommerville, J. E. M. (1983). Plant form and function in relation to nutrient gradients. In 'Mineral Nutrients in Mediterranean Ecosystems'. (Ed. J. A. Day.) pp. 55-76. South African National Scientific Programmes Report No. 71 (CSIR: Pretoria.)
18. Nobel, P. S. (1980). Leaf anatomy and water use efficiency. In 'Adaptation of Plants to Water and High Temperature Stress'. (Eds N. C. Turner and R. J. Kramer.) pp. 43-55. (John Wiley: New York.)
19. Parkhurst, D. F. (1978). The adaptive significance of stomata occurrence on one or both surfaces of leaves. Journal of Ecology 66, 367-383.
20. Podani, J. (1994). 'Multivariate Data Analysis in Ecology and Systematics - a Methodological Guide to the SYN-TAX 5.0 Package.' (SPB Academic: The Hague.)
21. Shields, I. M. (1950). Leaf xeromorphy as related to physiological and structural influences. The Botanical Review 16, 399-447.
22. Turner, I. M. (1994). Sclerophylly: primarily protective? Functional Ecology 8, 669-675.
23. Venkata Rao, C. (1971). 'Proteaceae.' (Council of Scientific Industral Research: New Dehli.)
24. Witkowski, E. T. F., and Lamont, B. B. (1991). Leaf specific mass confounds leaf density and thickness. Oecologia 88, 486-493.
25. Wrigley, J. W., and Fagg, M. (1989). 'Banksias, Waratahs and Grevilleas: and All Other Plants in the Australian Proteaceae Family.' (Collins: Sydney.)